Sooo how was everyone elses interview experience??? Both my faculty and student interviewers were extremely rude. It felt like they were forced to be there and had zero interest in getting to know me as an applicant. They basically just read standard questions from a piece of paper with zero emotion, wrote down a few things, never smiled, did not intently listen, and couldn't wait for it to be over. Totally unprofessional if you ask me. I don't even care if I get in or not, I can't imagine what else is wrong with this school if that is the first impression they give to potential students. Anyone else had a similar experience (or totally different experience)???
I had a similar experience. Everyone else in my group seemed to have a very positive experience, but my interviewer was extremely rude to me. When this person first came out of the office, I was ignored and told to wait for another 10 minutes. I was then asked back-t0-back questions about my record without an introduction, but was told that all my answers didn't make sense because I kept getting interrupted and was not allowed to elaborate on anything. After adapting to "topic sentences" to fit this mode of questioning, I could tell my answers weren't satisfactory because I could not share my personality. In the end I was asked if I had any questions. Since I was never introduced, I asked about the interviewer's role at the school. (From my experience at other interviews, if he/she is a PhD faculty I could ask about research opportunities or learning tracks, etc.) Instead, I was yelled at (raised volume) by this person and asked how that related to anything at all. When I asked another question about the 2 curriculum tracks, again I was berrated for getting my facts wrong, even though we had just had an orientation about it. Later, the other interviewers confirmed this discrepancy. Apparently one faculty knew more about the changes than the other, but how were we candidates supposed to know (and what was the big deal if we got it wrong? We are here to learn about it). I remained calm for the rest of it.
After coming out of that, I was too stressed during my lunch with the student. I tried to tell him about the reasons why Drexel is my top choice and my long non-traditional history to finding medicine. I realized that he probably thought I was a gunner as soon as I said it, but in context I was just completely traumatized. In the end I asked for his email if I had any more questions/to thank him. He seemed hesitant but told me, and confirmed what I wrote on paper. That night, the email bounced because it was fake.
By the way, I have had 3 other acceptances and I am not trying to sound ungrateful, but I really liked visiting Philadelphia and am currently waiting for my decision in the mail. I have never felt so strongly about wanting to go to a school, but unfortunately of all my interviews, it was the worst. I recovered as much as I could throughout the whole process, but no matter what I did it seemed like the interviewer started from a place of not liking me and it was hard to recover from that. I asked my adviser if I had done anything wrong by asking about what the interviewer did, and she tried to make me redo my interview. She has advised for 40 years, so I was shocked that she was moved by this account since nothing is a big deal with her. I had the sense that this would have made it worse, but it goes to show how much I was somehow convinced that I had done wrong. I'm sure none of my interviews were perfect, but having worked in business with all sorts of personalities, I consider myself fairly polished when it comes to these things. If anyone else has an upcoming interview, chances are that you will have a good one. If not, just remember to not take these things personally as I did. I am sure there are great things about your candidacy that has made you successful thus far.