- Joined
- Feb 2, 2015
- Messages
- 199
- Reaction score
- 122
So I'm flying out right after the interview does anyone know if they let you keep a bag anywhere?
I think (interviewers) are only provided with your essays and demographics so they are not biased. If someone else could chime in who knows moreIs there not a section in TMDSAS that you get when you are a re-applicant? Would they not see that?
Is there not a section in TMDSAS that you get when you are a re-applicant? Would they not see that?
So I'm flying out right after the interview does anyone know if they let you keep a bag anywhere?
Don't think you can apply through AMCAS. You have to go through TMDSAS. Anyone can correct me if I am wrong.Is it too late to send in a primary here? And am I at a disadvantage if I send through AMCAS?
Probably just for MD/PhD on AMCAS?Oh AMCAS has it as a listed school so i got confused
It's been asked, but not answered... Did anyone with IIs here take the new MCAT? Or did most have scores from the old test?
I don't know about the new MCAT, but I do know the II is purely based on scores. I got an interview almost immediately after I submitted my secondary. They might still be trying to figure out how the new MCAT scores compare. When it comes down to it I think the time you submit is way more important than the day you interview, so if your scores are comparable (check percentile), I wouldn't be concerned.
What secondary? San Antonio has a secondary??I don't know about the new MCAT, but I do know the II is purely based on scores. I got an interview almost immediately after I submitted my secondary. They might still be trying to figure out how the new MCAT scores compare. When it comes down to it I think the time you submit is way more important than the day you interview, so if your scores are comparable (check percentile), I wouldn't be concerned.
Just out of curiosity, how do you know the II is based only on scores?I don't know about the new MCAT, but I do know the II is purely based on scores. I got an interview almost immediately after I submitted my secondary. They might still be trying to figure out how the new MCAT scores compare. When it comes down to it I think the time you submit is way more important than the day you interview, so if your scores are comparable (check percentile), I wouldn't be concerned.
What secondary? San Antonio has a secondary??
Also my scores are above a bunch of people that got IIs already so I don't think it's just scores though I do have a non traditional thing that might take them longer to process.
Edit: and I also submitted earlier than some of the people that got IIs
Just out of curiosity, how do you know the II is based only on scores?
Sorry, I was trying to ask how you know interview invites are only based on scores.I used the percentiles AAMC released from the new MCAT and the statistics from 2012-2014 MCATs.
Here's the link: https://www.aamc.org/students/apply...res/430680/percentileranksforthemcatexam.html
Sorry, I was trying to ask how you know interview invites are only based on scores.
No problem. I was just curious because I submitted 7/1 but I haven't heard anything and my scores are above what you had listed. I'm oos though, so I'm sure that has an impact.It was an assumption based on speed on how quickly I got an II, but what SweetCaroline7 said makes sense. Sorry to be misleading!
No problem. I was just curious because I submitted 7/1 but I haven't heard anything and my scores are above what you had listed. I'm oos though, so I'm sure that has an impact.It was an assumption based on speed on how quickly I got an II, but what SweetCaroline7 said makes sense. Sorry to be misleading!
No problem. I was just curious because I submitted 7/1 but I haven't heard anything and my scores are above what you had listed. I'm oos though, so I'm sure that has an impact.
Has anyone heard anything from the MD/PhD program? I designated them on AMCAS on 7/27 but never got any sort of a receipt. OOS, LizzyM around 71 if that helps. Have heard literally nothing from either SA or Houston.
Oh cool, thanks. That's good to know.At our interview day the dean said you guys interview later.
Do you think an application is reviewed after the first numeric cut-off more than once?It is not based solely on scores. On interview day, we were told by Dr. Jones that there are two cuts before II. First, there's some cutoff value of GPA x MCAT (he didn't state what value). This reduces the total number of applicants by 50%. Then there is a second look at the applications. Two different reviewers will look and have to give a thumbs up. This review is based on extracurriculars--it seemed numbers are no longer a factor at this point. This reduces the applicant pool to 20% of the (initial, pre-first cut) total number.
FWIW, I think this is for IS applicants. Dr. Jones didn't talk about the process for OOS. I'm not sure if that means the process is the same or just more nebulous and not discussed.
Do you think an application is reviewed after the first numeric cut-off more than once?
My only concern is if I have made it past the numeric cut-off. My most recent MCAT was a 31, which is a retake from a 25 earlier. I'm just hoping to God that my 25 has not filtered my app out.
Transmitted 7/16, got Review email from UTSA on 7/22. I have what you would call decent ECs, 3.9 GPA, but still no IIs from any TX school yet
I'm sorry, I'm honestly not sure. It seemed like the first cut was based purely on numbers, but I don't know if they go through the apps that don't meet the cutoff to look for circumstances like yours. Maybe you could call them to see how they treat multiple MCAT scores? It might just give you peace of mind while you wait (because I think this is just that, waiting! I don't think you're out of luck here.) The interview cycle is still so young, and your stats look great when you consider that retake. I looked back at my timeline and I waited about 6 weeks from the under review/complete email to II. I hope that helps!
This is weird because when Dr. Jones came to my school to talk about UTHSCSA, he said that every application would be looked at in its entirety in accordance with their holistic approach to admitting students. Did he tell you this specifically, or are you just speculating?
@SweetCaroline7
At my interview day I thought he said they "did not simply just make cuts based on GPA x MCAT?"
I could be wrong of course, but I thought he said they first screened off of some academic standards he would not disclose. He made it sound like a more in-depth academic screen than the above, based on their wide range of accepted numbers.
He then said the second screen, which cuts down to ~1000 is the holistic review, based on activities and essays.
So I think that @texan2414 would not be screened based on an old MCAT.
I really don't want to cause uneasy feelings.
Good point!Yeah, to me doing the MCAT x GPA wouldn't work out because some people have the new MCAT and some have the old. Unless they have some complex algorithm that coverts the two into one or the other. We will see though. I've heard of people with low GPAs and MCAT scores together get interviews, so I guess it depends on other factors as well. So difficult to understand how they choose applicants!!
Good point!
I think at the end of the day, I'm being overly neurotic.... I am still quite hopeful
I'm on the exact same boat as you. No clue what's going on.So I got the under review email around July 1 and have not received an II. I know that it's still early on in interview season, but I am getting a feeling that I'm not getting an invite. Any thoughts on this?
So I got the under review email around July 1 and have not received an II. I know that it's still early on in interview season, but I am getting a feeling that I'm not getting an invite. Any thoughts on this?