reinforced
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2022
- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- 251
+1OOS, secondary received (tbh very surprised???)
+1OOS, secondary received (tbh very surprised???)
I've heard they screen for fit? I could be wrong. I'm IS, non-trad average stats and got a secondary. Butttt I could be wrong?Is there a numerical screen?
I was verified 6/24. Received acknowledgement of primary on 6/28. And received secondary invite today 7/7. This is just me though.Does anyone know how long the screen typically takes? Would you say 1-2 weeks?
This is helpful, thank you!I was verified 6/24. Received acknowledgement of primary on 6/28. And received secondary invite today 7/7. This is just me though.
I was verified 6/16 and received confirmation of primary on 6/29 then secondary on 6/29. I think there is a screen but not a big one. Seems more like it’s just first come first serve, so they send them in waves?Does anyone know how long the screen typically takes? Would you say 1-2 weeks?
I was verified on 6/8 but never received an email from UCLA regarding receipt of my primary. I did get a "received" from CDU/UCLA.Does anyone know how long the screen typically takes? Would you say 1-2 weeks?
+1Anyone IS still without a secondary? I got verified on 6/27 so I should be fairly on the top of their list for secondary screening.
2) Respond to the following and indicate how these areas of experience have impacted your progress toward your future career goals in relation to becoming an "Outstanding Physician, AND...".
A-Describe your most unique leadership, entrepreneurial, or creative activity. (800 characters)
B-Describe your most important volunteer work and why it was meaningful. (800 characters)
Are you able to separate out the leadership aspect and the meaningful aspect? I could see it working if you're about to talk about how you demonstrated leadership/what you did to lead in the first essay and then in the second essay talk more about why the work you did was meaningful to you and the people you impacted.My leadership activity just so happens to be part of my most important/meaningful volunteer work. Im conflicted. Would it be okay to talk about the same activity in both of these prompts? Or would it be frowned upon? I know the best case scenario would be that they would be different activities.
The alternative would be to keep my leadership essay, but talk about a different volunteering experience. I started this different volunteering in April 2022 and I didn't list it on my primary because I felt that I hadn't accumulated enough hours for it to be significant enough. any advice is appreciated
appreciate the swift reply and advice! And I can definitely separate out the two aspects from each other.Are you able to separate out the leadership aspect and the meaningful aspect? I could see it working if you're about to talk about how you demonstrated leadership/what you did to lead in the first essay and then in the second essay talk more about why the work you did was meaningful to you and the people you impacted.
that sounds more authentic than subbing in something that you started in April, unless the new volunteer work was truly more meaningful than your other workappreciate the swift reply and advice! And I can definitely separate out the two aspects from each other.
that sounds more authentic than subbing in something that you started in April, unless the new volunteer work was truly more meaningful than your other work
you're giving hope to the rest of usIS secondary received. Primary verified 6/4, notice of primary submission 6/29. Looks like it doesn't have much to do with time of verification.
I put Yes for it because I assumed it meant the current cycle. But maybe someone else knows for sure!One of the questions reads, "I have applied for admission to the Traditional MD track or the Prime-LA track at DGSOM." Does this mean the current cycle or previous cycles?
Ok I did too! Thank you.I put Yes for it because I assumed it meant the current cycle. But maybe someone else knows for sure!
Same here. I got past UCSDs screen and figured I’d get past UCLAs as well but I guess not lol😂I wonder what their screening process is like. I got the “primary received” email end of June, but no secondary yet.
do they still have the high mcat screening? or was that a rumor?Same here. I got past UCSDs screen and figured I’d get past UCLAs as well but I guess not lol😂
do they still have the high mcat screening? or was that a rumor?
do they still have the high mcat screening? or was that a rumor?
Yeah, I don’t think it’s a stats screen. I got a secondary from CDU/UCLA and UCSD too so I’m a little surprised. I think I’m a pretty good mission fit for hereI don’t think so? My MCAT is below their average and I got a secondary earlier this week. Based on last years thread it seems like they are really doing holistic review
I was verified on 6/7People who've gotten their secondary, would you mind sharing when you were verified? I submitted on 6/3 so didn't get verified till 6/27. I'm hoping they just haven't gotten to my app yet.
I submitted 6/3 as well. Didn’t get verified until 6/27. Got my secondary 7/9 at 3AMPeople who've gotten their secondary, would you mind sharing when you were verified? I submitted on 6/3 so didn't get verified till 6/27. I'm hoping they just haven't gotten to my app yet.
Myself and others had this question and we assumed it meant applying now and put yes lol"I have applied for admission to the Traditional MD track or the Prime-LA track at DGSOM." Yes or No question
is this question asking if I have previously applied? or is it asking if I am applying now lol
Someone answered a question like this in the 21-22 UCLA thread and said yes. The advice they gave on that thread was to keep the answer to the first prompt broad, so that your answers in 2A,2B,2C, etc follow the theme described in the first prompt. I dont think it needs to be a perfect fit (Mine wasn't a perfect fit either), but it seems to me that these questions are asked in such a way that they seem to want us to frame our activities toward a narrative. But ultimately, I think its important you write whats important and most meaningful to you.For questions A, B, and C where we're describing leadership/volunteer/research impacts our future career goals, are we relating this specifically to the previous question's "outstanding physician, AND..." answer?
As in, if I answer "I want to become an outstanding physician, AND a leading hot air balloon enthusiast" (just for illustration), then my answers for A, B, and C should be along the lines of "my leadership has made me interested in integrating hot air balloon science with health," "volunteering has made me certain that I want to become a balloon physician," and "my research has grown a passion for pushing the bounds of balloon health research"?
I ask this because this will completely change my answer to "outstanding physician, AND..." If I'm going to have to relate all these three very independent areas of my application to one theme, then I'm going to be pretty restricted on how I answer.
i was verified on 7/6 (submitted 6/7) so i was surprised i got a secondary this quickly, especially with a below average MCAT. they just tryna give me false hopePeople who've gotten their secondary, would you mind sharing when you were verified? I submitted on 6/3 so didn't get verified till 6/27. I'm hoping they just haven't gotten to my app yet.
Someone answered a question like this in the 21-22 UCLA thread and said yes. The advice they gave on that thread was to keep the answer to the first prompt broad, so that your answers in 2A,2B,2C, etc follow the theme described in the first prompt. I dont think it needs to be a perfect fit (Mine wasn't a perfect fit either), but it seems to me that these questions are asked in such a way that they seem to want us to frame our activities toward a narrative. But ultimately, I think its important you write whats important and most meaningful to you.
okay cool i did the same hahah thank you!Myself and others had this question and we assumed it meant applying now and put yes lol