- Joined
- Sep 26, 2002
- Messages
- 10,910
- Reaction score
- 1,155
As I am sick and home from work... more questions for the medschool mafia to take your mind off the politics.
Who teaches what for MS1 (at least the first semester)? I know from reading this thread that there are multiple lecturers for the same class, but could you break it down for us?
Who is a good lecturer? Is there anyone that could teach you the phone book and make it interesting? Who is isn't so good?
Who has more material on tests and whose material is harder?
Since you guys are talking about competitive specialties, does anyone know OU's average score on Step 1 & 2 (specifically Step 1)? I asked during my interview and all I could get was: "Our pass rate is on par with the rest of the US, and that won't be a problem for you." I wasn't really satisfied. You can pass by one point but if, say, 3/4 of the class barely passes that says something about the school's curriculum.
I know that one can work hard and overcome, but like the Wiz, I don't want to be limited in what specialty I ultimately go into because of my first two years.
At the start of the year, you'll be able to buy an unofficial guide that is put out by the class above it. It generally contains information about professors and tests and what's worth attending and what you should skip. Overall, I think it leans a bit more in favor of attending class than is necessary, though.
Here's my quick rundown of the first semester --
Biochem -- this is taught by 50 million different professors, about half of which are good and half just plain suck. The guide will give you a breakdown, but the ones that are especially bad are Broyles, Hanas and Steinberg. The ones that are especially good are Bidichandani, Fuller (I heard -- didn't attend his lectures), and I'd say Weigel. Leon is good if you listen to him at 2x speed, but going to his classes can be a bit frustrating because he's slow and sort of random. Whether you should go or not go to any of them -- I didn't go and made an A. Leon will give you the breakdown before each test and how many questions will come from each instructor -- it's usually divided pretty evenily.
Anatomy -- imo, this is not a subject that lecture is helpful for. I attended lecture to get the ARS points, but I generally daydreamed or skimmed Chung's book on my own during the lecture. The lectures are mostly given by Chung, O'Donoghue and Dandajana. Chung is funny because he just starts to talk faster if he's running out of time, but he'll repeat what he thinks is important like 50 times so just focus on what he repeats. O'Donoghue tells a lot of jokes and some self-aggrandizing stories (might bug you, might not), and his lectures are referred to as "point and name" because he points his laser pointer at structures and names them. Dandajana tells weird jokes and is sort of hard to understand. He's a dentist, so he thinks teeth are important.
Up until the last exam, the anatomy written test was really predictable because the questions were very similar to the questions in Chung's BRS book. However, if Chung is still gone next fall, the class is probably going to be pretty different. The one thing I noticed from our last exam (our one non-Chung exam) is that things like muscular attachment seemed more important.
Embryo -- Tomasek teaches the first part of the class, and he's a really good lecturer. A lot of the material is very visual, and it builds on itself, so I'd recommend going to class for the first test block. You can also watch the lectures in your mod, but with me being attention-challenged, I got more out of sitting in the lecture hall. Rada takes over after the first test block, and her stuff is really straight forward. I largely attended lecture, but I think you could get away with skipping and just studying her power points.
Human Behavior -- this is a trickier one. Like biochem, we have lots of different lectures with varying skill. I personally would recommend going just because attending lecture and studying the night before is generally enough to make an A. Lecture does sort of help you clue into what each professor considers to be important. Also, it's sort of an ego boost because you can always follow the lectures without anything going over your head.
Personally, my favorite professors were Smith, Scott and Allen. Scott and Allen's material makes up a big chunk of the first test, so I'd especially recommend going to their stuff. Morgan, bleh, she just reads off her powerpoints, but she gives you bonus points for going. Tucker is an odd one (she's the one who shows the porn), but her material makes up a huge chunk of the second test block, so I'd go to her stuff, too. I've got to say I wasn't a huge fan of her test questions because she seemed to focus on really little things. For example, she gave us a list of risky sexual behaviors and asked us which one was riskier -- to answer correctly, you had to have memorized one small chart buried in her power points.
Anyway, this is just my quick rundown. Hope it's somewhat helpful.