when did you interview?I just got a letter that I am an alternate. I don't remember ... does SOMA have multiple waitlists? What exactly is an alternate? Is that what they call everyone on their waitlist(s)? Just trying to gauge my chances. =)
when did you interview?I just got a letter that I am an alternate. I don't remember ... does SOMA have multiple waitlists? What exactly is an alternate? Is that what they call everyone on their waitlist(s)? Just trying to gauge my chances. =)
when did you interview?
I interviewed on the 19th and have not heard anything yet.Feb. 26th.
I interviewed on the 19th and have not heard anything yet.
I wasn't aware they gave refunds, where did you decide to go?
In case anyone is interested, I have some information regarding the wait lists. I got a letter telling me I'm an alternate this week and called Joyce with a few questions and she told me I'm on the medium wait list. So far this year they have taken almost everyone from the high wait list. They will not be taking any more students from the wait lists until May. I am assuming May is when the deposit is due? Anyone know about that? Anyway, in previous years, they have taken about half of the students on the medium wait list, but anticipate to take fewer than that this year. There are 40 people on the medium wait list and as spots open up, students on the lists are re-evaluated.
That's pretty funny, because I'm from the west coast and I feel the same way about ending up out east...
A current student could likely answer this better, but until then I'll tell you the response I got on my interview day.
Everyone ranks their top choice. If there are enough spots to give everyone their favorite spot, they get it. If there are too many applicants for a particular spot you then have an opportunity to provide any additional information on why you want that spot, like having family in the area, or plans to practice medicine there. If you still don't get your favorite spot, you can then apply for your second favorite. According to the student, it's not a random drawing at all, and most people get their first choice (but obviously not all).
I received a couple PM's which asked me questions on the CHC's, what specialties they wanted to do, and also regarding the shelf exams. I'll instead reply here so people can get some more information.
Personally, unless you have had significant exposure to a specialty before medical school, I think a decision on which specialty you want to match to should probably be left until you do your 3rd year rotations, and keep your mind open about them. Its good that you may have an interest in something for now, just keep in mind that this may change. Say you thought you liked Family practice, but instead found yourself really liking a Heme/onc rotation or something. Just FYI.
In regards to CHC's, some are more 'competitive' than others simply because they are in more 'desireable' locations like big cities. Its not hard to figure out why, I mean big cities have more social life stuff going on. The school picked the CHC's because they were big enough to give you a good clinical intro during 2nd year, and are affiliated with big hospitals for the most part and have some academic connections for 3rd and 4th year rotations. 4th year you do rotations where you want, and just like every other school you should probably have an idea of where to rotate and what to do by then.
Someone PM'd me about clinical shelf scores being low.
Yes, thats true, the most recent class perfomed slightly below the national average for their clinical shelf scores. Is this an indicator of anything? probably, then again maybe not, since your grade is based on how well you scored on the NBOME shelf exam + your rotation grade.
Also, keep in mind that the curriculum was kinda being figured out at the time when the class of 2011 first came here, the program was brand new and needed kinks worked out. Is this a problem for you if you are going class of 2014? doubtful. The school is pretty on the ball about listening to students and their concerns.
What does it all mean? Nothing really. The board scores that were released range from like a 405 to a 650 or higher. What does that say? That some people rocked it, and others didnt. Is this reflective of the curriculum? Highly doubt it since most board studying is done by yourself, regardless of which med school you go to , DO or MD. What does it mean? nothing really, this school is the same as any other DO school in terms of stuff like that.
My personal opinion? If you like clinical and hands on stuff, and you like technology, this school has a lot of perks. If you like reading dusty textbooks and sitting in an auditorium with 400 people, you probably wont like this school. If you are a lazy person who basically wants to do the bare minimum and expect med school to funnel you into Derm or something, you might be in for a rude awakening, here or anywhere for that matter.
Bottom line is this. You gotta work hard for what you want. Dont expect any school to just give you the keys to ROAD specialties or something. Are the tools here at this school to help you succeed? yup. Do I use most of em? Yup. Is my class rank good? you bet. Is my performance good on my board practice stuff? yup. and I self motivated? yup.
Are students who are loafers getting great grades? nope. Are students who don't utilize all the resources getting good grades? doubtful.
It's all relative.
Arth. c/o '13
My personal opinion? If you like clinical and hands on stuff, and you like technology, this school has a lot of perks. If you like reading dusty textbooks and sitting in an auditorium with 400 people, you probably wont like this school. If you are a lazy person who basically wants to do the bare minimum and expect med school to funnel you into Derm or something, you might be in for a rude awakening, here or anywhere for that matter.
Bottom line is this. You gotta work hard for what you want. Dont expect any school to just give you the keys to ROAD specialties or something. Are the tools here at this school to help you succeed? yup. Do I use most of em? Yup. Is my class rank good? you bet. Is my performance good on my board practice stuff? yup. and I self motivated? yup.
Are students who are loafers getting great grades? nope. Are students who don't utilize all the resources getting good grades? doubtful.
It's all relative.
Arth. c/o '13
Actually, starting this year, you don't have to purchase the computer. You can use your own if it meets the minimum requirements.
I love the wording of this. Who doesn't love great technology? "If you like technology, this school has a lot of perks... " Lets go over the technology of the school.
1) 42 inch Flat screens in small group room and in the lecture hall.
2) $2,000 tablet pc which you are forced to buy and the curriculum does not call for tablet pc functioning.
3) ahh the podcasts 2nd year. This is the same thing as audiovisual recordings that other schools use. The podcast is a recording of a professor explaining the powerpoints. It's taped and used each year. Its a convenient and cheap way of teaching which definately has some perks. The school doesn't have to pay repeatedly for the same lecture to be given year after year, as it is just recorded once and dispersed when the lecture is called for. You can also pause it as you wish to jot down notes, look things up in "dusty" books, etc. Again, no different than other schools that offer audiovisual recordings of lectures from years 1-2. A number of schools do this, but soma likes to make it sound fancy by calling it a "podcast".
"If you like reading dusty textbooks and sitting in an auditorium of 400 people..."
I'm not really sure anyone likes to read dusty textbooks... I often use my textbooks so much, they don't really get dusty. But had I went to a traditional medical school... yeahhh they'd be dusty and thats just gross!
If anyone wants to see the quality of the lectures since textbooks aren't really necessary for the schools instruction, contact me and I'll send you a lecture (whoops I mean presentation) from each professor so you can gauge if the presentation of the material is to your liking instead of taking anyone elses word for it.
I think it's pretty much been established that joes ...
A. Doesn't know what he or she (joe simmons is a fake name and a fake email) is talking about. (As to technology, besides the flat screens, what about the Sim Men in every Small Group Room, the Harvey Heart Sound machine, the MLO system for distributing electronic materials, the echo 360 lecture recording system, etc. etc. etc.)
B. Has a bone to pick with the school, I'm guessing as an excuse for his or her own shortcomings.
C. Has an arrogant/hostile/negative/condescending attitude. (We don't have a curriculum designed for tablet PC's? The idea behind the tablets is that they are just one more tool for us to do what medical school is all about, study hard. No one piece of technology or educational delivery system is going to magically grant you knowledge of medicine, but we are given an array of tools to help us to learn the material ourselves.)
I tried to email joes, listen to his or her side of the story, and understand where he or she is coming from, but was unable to have a coherent conversation after several emails. The emails were all rants about how ignorant everyone at the school is to the ploy that the school is trying to sabotage everyone's education so that they are tricked into doing primary care.
I would take everyone's opinion on sdn worth a grain of salt, including mine, but joes really is just way out there.
is it a good time to now post where you said in an email "I think your right... i spoke to a 3rd year who is disillusioned with her rotations from the phx chc. It seems as though she doesn't know where she will be. I guess i was only voicing my opinions after only knowing the students from the bk chc."
I'm not really sure why the point I made isn't being responded to about dusty textbooks and the great technology. I also love how admin post on here.
is it a good time to now post where you said in an email "I think your right... i spoke to a 3rd year who is disillusioned with her rotations from the phx chc. It seems as though she doesn't know where she will be. I guess i was only voicing my opinions after only knowing the students from the bk chc."
I'm not really sure why the point I made isn't being responded to about dusty textbooks and the great technology. I also love how admin post on here.
Who are the admins and how do you know this?
Here's the real quote from my email."I'm beginning to understand better where you're coming from. Today at the Buddhist free clinic thing with SOMA2 I talked to a 3rd year who is in Phoenix and who is somewhat disillusioned with her rotations, some of which were with private outpatient IM docs who didn't give her much exposure or time with patients. I guess I was somewhat biased since I am going to Brooklyn and all of my interactions with upperclassmen have been at Brooklyn.Mostly what I was doing was grasping at some sort of substance as to where you were coming from. It's a social gesture, called "listening," where you try to understand and analyze what the other person is saying.
I was very, very skeptical of the school before coming. I had acceptances at other schools, and wouldn't have come, because it was so new, but I decided at the last minute to visit the Brooklyn CHC, which completely sold me on SOMA. So a lot of my older posts (I posted a ton last year) were more skeptical, but I think you're right, lately my posts have been way more positive than skeptical. To be fair, I really have had a great experience here so far - the faculty are always available, I'm pretty satisfied with the curriculum, the way things are set up, etc. Looking at board prep questions, I feel like I'm preparing myself well.
A second year in Phoenix that was also at the Buddhist clinic today did point out that the school just signed a contract with County Hospital here in Phoenix for better rotations, which everybody was pretty excited about. So it appears that they are at least working on it."
I'm not saying that there are no cons to SOMA - it is a new school, for sure. But I'm also trying to tell the whole story here. (Like the above contract with County here in Phoenix).
I would imagine that other things would fall under technology such as .
1.) Echo360-(a computer, camera, software system that records all lectures with audio/visuals and the slide the presenter is on and then allows access from internet). A lot of schools just use a scribe service to type out notes.
2.) Harvey (the heart auscultation dummy/robot, that allows many students at a time to hear a multitude of murmurs and arrhythmias through infrared receiving stethoscopes)
3.) The sim-men/women (the group of other robot/dummies that allow auscultation, pulses, injections, etc)
4.) Simulations that include sim-men and vital sign computers
5.) Recorded OSCEs that can be viewed via internet. The camera/audio system for the small group rooms can be used to monitor medical skills groups as well.
6.) Software for learning heart and lung sounds
7.) Online library with access to medical reference sites, Ackland anatomy videos, 3D anatomy visualizations, etc.
8.) Recorded anatomy presentation and cadaver discussions
9.) And if you want more technology, there is always the real patient actors and breast/pelvis/rectal exams on live patients.
to name a some off the top of my head...
A few other comments
The LCDs are larger than 42inch The model number says 50inch.
The clinical shelf exam scores were grades of 42-48 people. Im not sure the school should be condemned because ½ of the first year class did decent with some doing excellent and others lower. Maybe they should be making changes in the curriculum and acceptance criteria to hopefully help those scores in future classes? Oh thats a rhetorical question, you and I both know they are. These statistics arent secret either; they were given to all 3 classes. Also, just a fun fact SOMA had the 2nd most interviews per seat (I realize we only accept 110ish students), SOMA also had the 2nd highest annual increase in total applications.
As Arthroscope has said and many residents/medical students have said, a lot of board studying is on your own. Didactics during rotations help, but the World question bank and books are generally what people rely on to study. As for first year, I have been using the provided lectures and supplement them with my regular books and board books. Ive been happy with my performance thus far.
As for the school forcing you to do primary care, I have not had that experience whatsoever. First month of school, my advisor asked what I was interested in and gave me names of docs, numbers, info on the specialty I was interested in. I think it was previously mentioned, but we have a nephrologist, 1 general surgeon, 1 bariatric surgeon, 1 plastic surgeon, who also did a fellowship in ortho, 1 ER doc, 1 Cardiologist, 1 Neurologist, and probably a few others I forgot that teach us and are there for us to use as resources.
SOMA is new; with a new curriculum .of course there are bumps along the way. The faculty is listening to students, looking at results, and trying to improve the school. No the school isnt perfect, none of them are.
/sigh...you complain about the "$2,000 laptops we are forced to buy" and when melissa posts about not having to buy them next year, you complain about that. I don't like the laptops either, but it's really not that big of deal is it?
Part of this is just re-iteration of what others have said before...most of the pre-meds and med students posting on SDN are smart enough to realize that a lot of what you get in med school is what you put in.
-plain51
There is NO audiovisual recordings of the lectures and there never were any. As a matter of fact in POM, Dr. Pong said we need the time we spend on recording the audio to make the powerpoints better, so unfortunately we can't record the audio anymore. He also mentioned how a number of students failed renal last year and said it was mostly those who didn't go to class, so they don't want to encourage that by recording the audio. Students record the audio now on their own and you know this!
Simulations that include sim-man? that is standard, so is the video recordings of it to view later. As a matter of fact, a lot of what you posted as great technology is standard. Recorded anatomy presentations and cadaver discussions are the same thing! The professor discusses the cadavers during anatomy.
A lot of board studying is on your own, but in every other school its a review. For example, the board collection series "Board Review Series". No school other than this do you have to learn more information that wasn't taught in class to do well on the boards. Other medical schools teach you more than what you need to know for the boards, this teaches less and you gotta find time to review what is taught in class thats on the boards as well as whats not taught in the school that is on the boards. This is unique to SOMA. www.doctorsintraining.com is a reputable board review course that explains how in medical school you get a lot more than what you need to know for the boards. This school (as faculty have warned me to help me prepare early), does not teach you even half of what you need to know for the boards. SOMA's schedule doesn't give students 30 hrs/day. You emphasize clinicals at the expense of something else. It is up to the student to fill in that gap, know what is to be learned and learn it on ones own without previous instruction on it during the coursework.
As for your advisor helping you out that like that?! Thats pretty sweet, I'm guessing Dr. Bennett?
This is what I meant by saying improvements have been made. It is called ECHO360 and was installed this year. We have recordings of audio/visual along with the slides the professor is on and this is accessible through the SOMA website. Interviewees probably saw the camera coming from the ceiling to record it. Changes can occur year to year!There is NO audiovisual recordings of the lectures and there never were any. As a matter of fact in POM, Dr. Pong said we need the time we spend on recording the audio to make the powerpoints better, so unfortunately we can't record the audio anymore. He also mentioned how a number of students failed renal last year and said it was mostly those who didn't go to class, so they don't want to encourage that by recording the audio. Students record the audio now on their own and you know this!
No, this is not standard. 1.) A good portion of MD and DO students alike do not have simulations, because clinical skills are not as heavily emphasized their first year 2.) Discussion of individual cadavers by a professor vs a Clinically Oriented Anatomy presentation before looking at the cadavers is not the same thing. They started to implement this after seeing NBME anatomy scores of upperclassmen (this is just my guess, but it started to happen at the same time)Simulations that include sim-man? that is standard, so is the video recordings of it to view later. As a matter of fact, a lot of what you posted as great technology is standard. Recorded anatomy presentations and cadaver discussions are the same thing! The professor discusses the cadavers during anatomy.
Again they are making changes, professors and faculty realize they needed more basic sciences and have included more into the curriculum. They have also hired new professors, including an excellent physiologist. Yes, I use BRS and First Aid books along with more in-depth books like Harrison's and Costanzo. The lectures cover much more info than what is in either one of those Board prep books. If you read the lectures, supplement them with those books you should have the material covered. I did not emphasize clinicals at the expense of something else. We go to school longer during the year to help fill the gap.A lot of board studying is on your own, but in every other school its a review. For example, the board collection series "Board Review Series". No school other than this do you have to learn more information that wasn't taught in class to do well on the boards. Other medical schools teach you more than what you need to know for the boards, this teaches less and you gotta find time to review what is taught in class thats on the boards as well as whats not taught in the school that is on the boards. This is unique to SOMA. www.doctorsintraining.com is a reputable board review course that explains how in medical school you get a lot more than what you need to know for the boards. This school (as faculty have warned me to help me prepare early), does not teach you even half of what you need to know for the boards. SOMA's schedule doesn't give students 30 hrs/day. You emphasize clinicals at the expense of something else. It is up to the student to fill in that gap, know what is to be learned and learn it on ones own without previous instruction on it during the coursework.
No, my advisor is a family medicine doc...but yeah, I like Dr. Bennett, he will bend over backwards to help you.As for your advisor helping you out that like that?! Thats pretty sweet, I'm guessing Dr. Bennett?
/cut/
An 18 year old boy involved in an automobile accident presents with an arm that cannot abduct. His paralysis is caused by damage to which of the following nerves?
A. suprascapular and axillary
B. Thoracodorsal and upper subscapular
C. Axillary and musclocutaneous
D. Radial and lower subscapular
E. Suprascapular and dorsal scapular
/cut/.
. Ahhh, yes... Dr. Simon addressing the school in the first deans meeting, "We typically take students who wouldn't otherwise get into medical school."
.
Only my weakest points have been argued against. How about 1/4 remediate and that is extremely high for any school. Ahhh, yes... Dr. Simon addressing the school in the first deans meeting, "We typically take students who wouldn't otherwise get into medical school." You are right. This school does have a lot of benefits. For example, this school has its students do "4th year simulations" such as the stroke simulation.
"ImonAPlain", wasn't it you who said the school gives students a 70% greater chance of getting in if they volunteer at the schools CHC, not nec. at their hometown CHC which is what this school said it was about when I applied. I know who you are as well and you have much different opinions of the school when not posting on SDN.
....oh wait, there is no such thing as a 4th year simulation!
Congrads on becoming a student here "melissaliss" paddock.
I'm done with this. Good luck at SOMA.
Isn't Melissa Paddock an admission counselor? Melissaliss are you really an admissions counselor??
Joes - how do you figure she's Ms. Paddock. If you look at her other posts, she applied to Touro Nv and AZCOM, but I did see where she put two different gpa's in two different threads. One was a gpa of 3.5 and somewhere else she put 3.38 - I think this was the nova thread.
Also, other students have PM'ed me that this school sucks. I've read that nurse managers will be your boss at the CHC. This really made my decision to NOT to go to ATSU. I want to report to a doctor, NOT nurse managers. I"m not going to nursing school for crying out loud!!!!!
Ha ha. No, I'm definitely NOT an admissions counselor. I am in no way affiliated with admissions of administration of any school. If you want confirmation of this fact, please feel free to PM me. I have a 3.39 undergrad GPA. If I wrote something different, it was simply an error of typing. I'm all for a good-natured debate, but why can't these things be done without insulting of attacking others? I just see no use in disrespect.
Only my weakest points have been argued against. How about 1/4 remediate and that is extremely high for any school. Ahhh, yes... Dr. Simon addressing the school in the first deans meeting, "We typically take students who wouldn't otherwise get into medical school." You are right. This school does have a lot of benefits. For example, this school has its students do "4th year simulations" such as the stroke simulation.
"ImonAPlain", wasn't it you who said the school gives students a 70% greater chance of getting in if they volunteer at the schools CHC, not nec. at their hometown CHC which is what this school said it was about when I applied. I know who you are as well and you have much different opinions of the school when not posting on SDN.
....oh wait, there is no such thing as a 4th year simulation!
Congrads on becoming a student here "melissaliss" paddock.
I'm done with this. Good luck at SOMA.
i dont think you are melissa paddock because you posted on other threads. i dont think she has time to do that, but who knows.
now lets get down to business: doesnt it bother you guys that you will be reporting to nurse managers during years 2-4?? we are going to be doctors so shouldnt we report to them.
doesnt this influence your decision at all? i find it creepy to report to nurses.
I remember reading a post of a student reporting to a nurse manager for 1 rotation. Does this concern me? Well, I researched and talked to students at the CHC's I was hoping to get into and they were thoroughly overjoyed with their CHC. Unfortunately, all the CHC's can't be the same.
i dont think you are melissa paddock because you posted on other threads. i dont think she has time to do that, but who knows.
now lets get down to business: doesnt it bother you guys that you will be reporting to nurse managers during years 2-4?? we are going to be doctors so shouldnt we report to them.
doesnt this influence your decision at all? i find it creepy to report to nurses.
so please let the prospective students know which chc's make you report to nurse managers. this is very sad and i hope the administration at atsu know about this and fix this!!!
the tuition here is almost $40K and no one wants to pay that much to have a nurse to report to. this is just a disgrace.
please let people know which are the best chc's and which chc's have the most problems. this way people can decide where they want to go.
Can I ask you what is your aversion to nurses? They can be your best friend and your worst enemies depending on your professional relationship with them. Most nurses will know more than you for quite sometime anyways especially while you are in medical school.
EDIT: well put EastWestN2grt