Hey everyone,
I am a member of the inaugural class for the new curriculum (rising 3rd year here) and wanted to share my experience. As someone who does not think the new curriculum is the best or worst thing ever, I feel I can offer an objective view.
The new curriculum definitely hit a few bumps - mostly during my class's 2nd semester (the acute course). The big problem was that the prep guides were just way too long and many of the resources we were assigned were too extensive/esoteric for our level. The first half of the acute semester was therefore fairly demoralizing for a lot of students, but the second half was much better as the prep guides became much more manageable (and have continued to be manageable in the chronic and return to wellness semesters). The school also has gotten a subscription to Osmosis for all students and some professors have integrated those videos into their objectives on prep guides.
They've implemented changes to improve things for the class below us. I know the group quizzes (gRATs) were always stressful for us when they took place the day after an exam since it was hard to do well on them - as everyone is going to prioritize studying for the exam of course. They changed it to let us take these post-exam gRATs open note, and I believe for the class below us they do a "rolling gRAT" where they break up the gRAT throughout the week - so I think they answer a few questions relevant to each class in their groups before the start of the class. This makes it a lot less stressful.
Also, I thought one of the previous posters was a little misleading on the 3 failures. I checked our syllabus and yes you get 3 failures for exams before you're in danger of being kicked out (although learning specialists will work with you after your first failure so it's not like the school isn't invested in you). For the quizzes, the cutoff for an individual quiz (iRAT) fail is lowered from a 70 to a 60% since there are fewer questions obviously, and if you fail 3 quizzes you do not get kicked out. You just are advised to meet with a learning specialist. Your average for the group quizzes (gRAT) is always going to be 90%+ so combine that with the individual quizzes and it is pretty much impossible not to meet the 70% overall quiz score requirement to pass the semester. Also, I am sorry but if you can't score above a 60% on the individual quizzes you just didn't study enough IMO considering they usually drop/bonus multiple questions each quiz. Yes there often are some bad questions but most of the quiz questions come straight from the resources and many are social medicine/common sense lol.
Most of the faculty are very good and are committed to our success. In particular, I think our anatomy faculty are amazing and I love our immunology professor. Sure there are a few not so great faculty members, but I'm sure that's going to be the case at all med schools.
The self-directed learning focus of the curriculum is the big negative for most students. I think I understand the basis for this curriculum change since in the traditional lecture style many students just skip class (at all med schools really), so I think the administration wanted to create something that would be more engaging/helpful. Perhaps the problem though is that you're really only going to get anything out of class if you prepared well in advance, in which case you probably will only pick up a couple new things TBH. If you don't prepare well, you're not really going to be able to follow along and will likely pick up nothing. I think this is the part of the curriculum that needs reconsidered, and to be honest yes the administration does seem a bit too defensive about it.
In terms of negatives, I would say I really wish the faculty would create more pre-records/powerpoints for their objectives. I think the curriculum focuses too much on board-irrelevant material - mainly a lot of social medicine stuff. It's good to know about this stuff, especially since many med students come from more privileged backgrounds, but I do feel that it takes up a lot of time that would be better spent on more high-yield material like microbiology. That said, I have no point of comparison since I have only attended this school, and it sounds like this might be the case at all med schools, check out this op-ed from a former curriculum dean at the University of Pennsylvania:
Opinion | Med School Needs an Overhaul
I also cringe whenever we role-play in class lol but that does not happen too often (I've noticed it's mainly just these 3 professors who are into it for some reason).
I know there was a lot of frustration that classes are mandatory - especially this past semester since we wanted more time to study for boards. I don't disagree, but I do think it was overblown a bit as our classes were generally 8-12 with the whole afternoon off to study, and only one class on Fridays. I guess just view it as an opportunity to hone your time management skills.
The new curriculum is group-based. I personally like that aspect since it gives you the chance to get to know people you might not have gotten to know otherwise - especially on the Athens campus which might feel a bit cliquish/high schoolish since it's just a lot of people. We only have one class on Fridays which is to spend 2 hours with your small group - I think this is fine for the wellness semester as we adjust to med school but seems kind of pointless in the semesters after that. But depending on what faculty coach you have you are free to spend the time as you wish, so hopefully your group can make the time worthwhile. I would personally just rather have the day completely off to study or have a class dedicated to board prep/more high yield material.
Overall, I am happy with my decision to come here, but I do acknowledge there are the aforementioned problems.
I would be happy to answer any questions anyone has - either on here or message me. Good luck to everyone on the waitlist!