I interviewed at Tech, UTSA, and UT-Houston. UTMB wouldn't give me the time of day (thank goodness, a classmate transferred out there and didn't like it at all) and I didn't apply to A&M's school. (For no other reason than I was absolutely sick of College Station at that point. Plus, I didn't want to end up in Temple for two years.) UTSA had a bunch of issues going on the year I applied. I remember the first thing the director said was, "I know we don't have the best reputation, but we're working to fix that." I think whatever issues they had are a moot point now, but I guess I don't have to say that my interview experience went downhill after that.
I ranked Tech 2nd after Houston. I liked Houston mainly for the med center. Like you (I'm assuming), I grew up in West Texas, so going to Lubbock was a bit like going home. I like that the faculty has an honest and complete open-door policy, the facilities for students are very nice, and Lubbock is a comfortable and cheap place to live for a couple years.
I also chose Tech mainly for El Paso. Strange, but true. Your 3rd/4th years are going to be what
you make it, no matter where you go, but I had an amazing experience out there. If you jump in there, you'll get to do quite a bit. (i.e. I had a few weeks where it was just me and the attending. So who saw the consults? I did. At my away rotation, they wouldn't even let the students do H&P's...I did them every day and was made absolutely responsible for the accuracy and completion.) And then there's the central lines, chest tubes, suturing, etc.
I'm not saying that you can't get that elsewhere (you
should get it everywhere), but I'm happy I spent my four years with Tech. (Even if you are a bunch of tortilla-tossing goofballs.
)
I think you can see elsewhere the benefits/disadvantages of each campus. All in all, sure Texas Tech is "Texas Tech", but we do send our students to Yale, Wash U, MGH, etc for residency. And we can't forget the University of Maryland.