5) It wouldn't be my choice that you'd include research that was not original and hypothesis-based along with projects that were. (Other is a better tag.)
Wow, thank you for answering all of that! That was extremely helpful.
I am still a little confused about how to categorize and list all my research. I have done the following research projects:
1. The film/politics essay I described above, culminating in a paper presentation at my school's undergraduate research symposium
2. A literature review about a neuroscience topic, culminating in a poster presentation at the same symposium
3. A neuroscience experiment culminating in a poster presentation at the same symposium
4. A neuroscience experiment culminating in a publication at my school's undergraduate research journal and a poster presentation at a regional neuroscience conference in another state (received a travel grant)
5. A neuroscience experiment that I received a summer research grant for and counted as research credit in my final semester, culminating in a thesis paper and a poster which I was unfortunately not able to present (the conference was cancelled due to inclement weather)
I think I'll leave out number 1 since I don't see how it enhances my application. Number 3-5 I will include in research and mark "most meaningful." Number 2 I feel like I should include somewhere, but I'm not exactly sure where.
Should I make a "Presentations/Posters" section and just include 2-4, and leave out 5 because it was never presented? And then make a "Research" section and just include 3-5? The one drawback to this is that I did number 2 earlier than number 3. If I include 2 in "Research" then I can say I did research for 2 and 1/2 years, whereas if I leave it out it's more like 1 and 1/2 years. I don't know if that really matters.
Also,
is it okay to just mention that number 4 was published in the "Research" section? It hardly seems worth making a "Publication" tab for a single publication in my school's undergrad journal.
7) It's a good idea to have something under Leadership if you are a candidate for the most-selective research-oriented schools. If you aren't, then signal the leadership component in the name of the scribe activity slot and perhaps state the % of the hours listed that were dedicated to training others.
I am applying to some selective research-oriented schools.
Should I make a Leadership tab where I just include the hours that I worked as a trainer, then in the Clinical Employment section exclude the trainer hours and just have all the other scribe work? Would adcoms think it looks like "cheating" or just awkward structuring to slice up my time like that?
And finally one more simple question -
is it okay to do some activities in list form and others in paragraph form? I understand it's fine to choose either one, but is it imperative that we stay consistent in our formatting? I'd like to write about my scribe work, and maybe my research experience (my 2 most meaningful), in paragraph form, and probably everything else in list form. I figure this would also be a good way to avoid stating the exact same thing twice for the 2 research projects I plan to reference under both "Research" and "Presentations," as I can give their titles and author list in the Presentations tab but just describe the work we did in the Research tab.
Edit: And now I'm realizing I have another question. I have worked as a scribe for multiple companies -
is it okay to list all of my scribe work under a single "Clinical Employment" section, put in the location/organization/contact for the chronologically first employer I worked for, and then in the narrative description include this information for the second employer? I had assumed this was okay but I just read a post here where someone suggested making different sections for activities involving different organizations.
Edit 2: I have a section called "miscellaneous volunteering" and I am trying to figure out the best way to organize my hours. My plan is to set the start-end dates to be the entire time span of the past several years, put in the organization/contact/etc for the oldest place I volunteered, and then more specifically describe the date and hours on each activity in the description.
Is that an okay way to do it? It feels so tedious and messy using the "repeated" function.
Edi 3: This seems like a simple question but I searched and couldn't find an answer - for one of my classes I was required to volunteer tutoring low-income children for an afterschool program, and got about 10 hours of volunteer experience through this.
Would it be frowned upon to include volunteer hours that were required for a course?