But the date span in the header should be for leadership years only, with the year of general membership referred to in the narrative as the back story, and not including those hours in your Total Hours of Leadership.
If the hours associated with each component are strong enough, certainly you can split the activities and their separate hours into two spaces. It's fine for the Leadership portion to be designated MM and to pick another activity as MM, too. It's also fine to have only 1-2 MM spaces.
I would want to know the criteria for receiving the awards. If you can give a notion of how selective the process was, that would be helpful.
Yes. And you might note in your narrative that she's no longer in practice by adding "(retired)" to your description of her.
1) 90 hours is terrific and sufficiently strong.
Sounds to me like it's Volunteer, but I'd mention the minimal stipend that is not a living wage.Hello--I apologize in advance if this has been asked anywhere else.
I am currently completing a "year of service" working in a community health position. We are sort of the link between the medical field and social services. I don't want to get too into details for anonymity, but we do things link getting people access to health insurance, chronic disease management, appointments, transportation, and lowering prescription costs. I sometimes go to appointments with consumers. I am not paid directly (other than a minimal (<$150) per month stipend), but room and board is taken care of. What should this be filed under? Volunteer experience? Work experience? Clinical or non-clinical? If you need more details, I am happy to PM. This might be one of my most meaningful experiences.
Thanks
1) Just because you didn't present it personally, that doesn't take away from the credit you get for authorship (tho you should give credit to the actual presenter). If you have to eliminate some, I'd use different criteria. Omit any presented at your home institution, or move them to the affiliated Research space. If any are based on the same project, you might list only the one that had the most prestigious venue, and vaguely refer to the rest. You could take out any where you are far down on the author list. You can also shorten the citations by summarizing titles and author lists to gain more space.
1) Yes.Thank you! I was able to omit 2.
1. Is it alright to abbreviate the conference for additional posters if I use the full name first? Ex. "Super Amazing Research Conference (SARC)"
2. I have two conference experiences, one national and international. However, the international one was hosted at my local university, so I was involved with managing and organizing. Would it be better to use the international conference experience than the national conference I was not affiliated with, even though our university hosted it? Or does it not matter at all
Thanks for the help! Looks like I'll be splitting it into two slots.
You could talk to someone and ask # of nominations vs # selected for recognition, in addition to including the "biggest impact" on campus criteria that you mentioned.
Enter a 0 or a 1. Preparation hours should be added to the Research Total Hours.
1) No. Yes.
Lastly: this is my 15th activity, and I was hesitant to include it because "15 is a lot," but I consider it an important product of my research. I state clearly that I didn't present the posters, describe my contribution, then cite them. This wouldn't be considered "fluff," right? I've quoted my other activities below so you could reference them.
1) You can cut out the non physician shadowing completely, or instead sum it up with one sentence about those occupations and total hours. If the entry still won't fit, pick the top total hours docs, list their details, and summarize the other specialties with total hours in one sentence.
It wouldn't be fluff. Go for it.
Enter 0 or the number of hours you spent sitting at the related awards ceremonies.
Thanks mucho!
If you have nothing with decent hours under clinical volunteer or employment, then Employment-Medical/Clinical would be more important for your application. If you do, you're fine to call it Research.
You are not obliged to list every experience you've had. When a Contact is contacted, however, a reference isn't asked for, just a confirmation of timespan and hours worked. You'll have to decide if listing an activity that required responsibility and performance under pressure supercedes the small chance that a Contact would be attempted and negative information offered.
No. It's an acceptable choice.
Title could be Fourth- Authored Paper on Biomechanics (or some other general category).
No. Better to say it's not, but to include the medic designation in the title you give the space. Let adcomms make their own decision.
I would use somewhat different vocabulary. The sentiment can remain the same.
The end date can be June 2018, but I suggest a conservative estimate of hours, and breaking the hours down by current and future so they are separate. Consider using the Repeated feature, using May as the start date for the second timespan. If you enter June before it's actually June, the program won't save it.
Cut out the Awards or mention the new scribe job in the PS or at the end of another clinical activity.
1) What was your role?
