I can't say you "should," but may you? Yes.
-Grouping is fine.
You might bring it up in a Secondary, or briefly in the PS without much detail as part of the process of deciding on medicine, but in general, it's felt that personal medical experiences shouldn't be listed in the Activities section.
1) If you were to list it as a Community Service - Not Medical/Clinical, you'd want to just list the 50 hours that you spent with the kids plus whatever prep time, organizational meetings towards this end, etc might have been involved. If you list it as Leadership, you could add in the time you spent getting the club up and running as a co-founder and as Secretary, along with those expanded dates. If you list it as Extracurricular, you could include the hours at general meetings plus all the above.
1) The entire activity you describe, both the personal clinical interaction and the training of others to do the same job, could be included in the same entry under Volunteer - Clinical/Medical. While you might separate out the training component and list it under either Teaching or Leadership, the activity will look more substantial if you don't split up the ~100 hours. If you keep them together, you'd want the title of the space to reflect both roles.
If it isn't common or self-explanatory, you should include the criteria for the recognition, as space allows. Even for Phi Beta Kappa, they are different from campus to campus.
are they clients or patients?
someone posted something a little similar about diabetes education in this thread a few posts ago. are they in a hospital or clinic when you facetime with them? were they referred to you by a doctor or some type of healthcare staff/program? if so I might be able to see it as clinical as they are patients.
Perfect answer. Super helpful. Thank you!
This would be a good use of the "Repeated" feature.
You have posted your question in the wrong thread (this one being for questions about the Activities section), but my opinion is that recharacterizing Into to Archeology in such a way won't fly. It's unlikely you can prove that the hard science content exceeded 50% of the course content.
Oops, my bad!
1) Yes.
As the name of the conference implies that it was local, you'd have to describe that it was not.
Describing a Study Abroad experience that made a big impact is often done. "Other" would be the most appropriate designation for such a listing.
I presented the poster (I was 1st author), and I don't believe it was required for me to present. So my concern is that I already have 3 other posters (none of which I presented) under one poster section, so would it be foolish to add this to conference or just create a new poster section or add it to the already existing poster section?
If your first-authored poster endured a selective review process, it might deserve its own space (suitably named First-Authored Poster on XXXX, perhaps). You might seek out the information about criteria for inclusion, including what % of submitted abstracts were accepted for presentation, and then include that in your description. If it was a selective process, and you decide it's "Own-Space Worthy," then you'd have plenty of room to describe how it qualifies as a regional conference in a second Posters/Presentations space (not a Conferences Attended space).
As the job began in HS, but continued into the college years, use the HS start date.
Put the accepted abstract with others already presented at conferences. If you feel compelled to mention a submitted manuscript, add it to your related Research description. Personally, I'd be in favor of not mentioning it and saving it for an update letter later in the cycle.
1) It's appropriate to list this as Leadership - Not Listed Elsewhere, so long as the dates include only the time where you were managing others and not the time you spent setting up the project before they came on board.
I'd designate it as Research, and name it so the clinical aspect is clear in the title you use. You might include "paid internship" somewhere in the narrative.
So would the total hours also be indicative of only the time I spent leading? Also is running participant considered leadership (where I told the participants what to do, from the start to end?
1) No, whether it would be original, hypothesis-based research (for which the "Research" tag is intended) or a project requiring a literature review (for which the tag "Other" is usually used).
1) Correct, though you could mention additional hours on the project in the narrative stating they are not included in the Total Hours listed.
Comments are made on items in red:
1) I'd suggest using either "Extracurricular" with the title naming your leadership position, or "Leadership."
