Also this exchange and exchanges like it where Cray just explains her wolf or village meta and we all nod along and agree just confuses me, because several of my earlier posts have been like that where I explain my thoughts and how I come to conclusions and that’s thrown out as not game solving or adding no value. But when others do it, it does add and is helpful. Which is why I tend to get annoyed playing this game and why others have said I’m always found sketch for something.
Like okay so we go off of what Cray herself is telling us about her own past play as 100% verified? and Zenge saying oh she would definitely be on top of the number and things as a wolf even though she’s already said hey I’m not able to be as present and following the thread bc of things, but somehow that’s not also factored in allowing for the possibility of her being a wolf. Because if you’re not able to be present in the thread as much and follow things then that’s going to affect your wolf play just as much as your village play. So I don’t think it’s a fair assessment for Zenge to be throwing out these comments saying oh well here’s another reason why Cray can’t be a wolf. When the reasoning isn’t that strong.
Overall it feels like we aren’t reassessing after the sunny flip, we’re just plowing ahead with one persons ideas. Which isn’t usually the greatest idea when any further misyeets will make it increasingly more difficult going forward
This is all well and good, except literally D1 in every wolf chat I go through and figure out based on wolf numbers and villager numbers, how many cycles to lylo assuming all kills go through and all pack mates survive. Because as Visc said, just about every game suffers from "too many villagers to kill not enough time." And I always repeat the advice from Mafia Wiki, wolves need to be planning their ideal lylo sitch from D1 and then craft it with NK choices and misyeet targets. So you absolutely have to do this and I do it every game. It isn't that hard and doesn't take that long. I should probably do this as a villager- except a huge main difference is I don't know pack size for sure in most games. I guess this one I do.
Obviously everything I say could be a lie and I could be a wolf. Just as I was able to see wolfiness in Barks, Sunny, hell even my village reads Shorty and Zenge (and one of them is confirmed). You can make a case for anyone.
But it doesn't change the fact, that when wolf, the above is what I do. And it doesn't change the fact my villager play is sloppy and lackadaisical at times. Could I try to play better or do numbers analysis as a villager as I do as a wolf? Sure. But. I. Don't.
So then, people have to ask, does this behavior feel genuine or does it feel faked. That's basically always the question, isn't it?
Now for how to figure that out, I can't help you.
My only tip is, look for intent to deceive. That was the thing about the issue with Sunny. I was NOT trying to act like there were For sure PRs. I wasn't Obviously trying to deceive.
See, Pippy claimed a PR in a mountainous game when scum. That was intent to deceive, clearly.
Now, you could say this is all an intent to deceive but it's Harder to see because I'm not being obvious about it.
I get the WIFOM nature to it all. I can never offer an explanation without being an IC, that will make my being a wolf impossible. And in fact that is not what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to explain, base on meta, how my play is consistent with my being a villager. And people will have to decide if what I'm saying is true, at least on that front.
I never lie about my meta. The real issue, is trying to figure out which meta of mine am I fitting into.
And my real hope with this, which sadly I am not focusing on analysis of others, is that at minimum I am providing opportunities for others to chime in an interact with me, in the hopes this will reveal they have a villager motivation or a wolfy way of going about it.