- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 133
So it's fair to say our chances are dashed at this point, or do you think acceptance calls will still continue tomorrow morning?
So it's fair to say our chances are dashed at this point, or do you think acceptance calls will still continue tomorrow morning?
couldn't help but check back in, seems like there weren't many calls at all today. Wish they'd just swing the axe now...haha
Why the hell is this? I just don't get it.....I feel like things should be a little more objective in the selection process. Anymore, it seems like race/gender etc. play a larger role than anything. I mean, look at the URM kids on SDN. Have more interviews than anyone haha
Why the hell is this? I just don't get it.....I feel like things should be a little more objective in the selection process. Anymore, it seems like race/gender etc. play a larger role than anything. I mean, look at the URM kids on SDN. Have more interviews than anyone haha
Let's face it- there's lots of factors that go into admissions decisions. And different schools value different attributes. It's not always going to be fair to everyone, unfortunately.If you're implying that good numbers and research is an objective standard for assessing how good a doctor one will be, then I don't think you understand how medicine works.
No offense to the person you're quoting at all, I'm not at all passing judgment on their app, but your statement itself is problematic.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Why the hell is this? I just don't get it.....I feel like things should be a little more objective in the selection process. Anymore, it seems like race/gender etc. play a larger role than anything. I mean, look at the URM kids on SDN. Have more interviews than anyone haha
RT so true, it's pretty unfair imo. And the "problem" with having higher stats is that mid to lower tier schools don't even invite you to interviews since they don't think you'll attend. So I really don't understand the whole "apply broadly" concept
Doesn't help being an ORM either
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Let's face it- there's lots of factors that go into admissions decisions. And different schools value different attributes. It's not always going to be fair to everyone, unfortunately.
I never said anything about URMs and ORMs. Those two did. My woes stem from the fact that I had the numbers, volunteering, clinical exposure and research to at least warrant further consideration. Nothing to do with demographics here. Plus, the fact is that I only even got ONE interview, so you can't blame my in-person traits for this.Really don't like either of these comments. There is a reason URM applicants are viewed with a slightly different lens. I echo your frustration about not getting the results we want, but do not look for others to blame. Hopefully this doesn't warrant further explanation and you both will understand the err of your comments...
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
One thing I think most applicants underestimate is how important the personal statement, secondary essays, and your description of your activities in the primary app are. That is what ultimately gets you an interview having well written, interesting, and unique essays that at the same time show humility and personality. Maybe URM candidates don't rely on stats and "objective" check marked activities(research, clinical,etc) as others do.Why the hell is this? I just don't get it.....I feel like things should be a little more objective in the selection process. Anymore, it seems like race/gender etc. play a larger role than anything. I mean, look at the URM kids on SDN. Have more interviews than anyone haha
I never said anything about URMs and ORMs. Those two did. My woes stem from the fact that I had the numbers, volunteering, clinical exposure and research to at least warrant further consideration. Nothing to do with demographics here.
I never said anything about URMs and ORMs. Those two did. My woes stem from the fact that I had the numbers, volunteering, clinical exposure and research to at least warrant further consideration. Nothing to do with demographics here.
I never said anything about URMs and ORMs. Those two did. My woes stem from the fact that I had the numbers, volunteering, clinical exposure and research to at least warrant further consideration. Nothing to do with demographics here.
Okay, my bad. Sorry, just a bit demoralized atm.
Why the hell is this? I just don't get it.....I feel like things should be a little more objective in the selection process. Anymore, it seems like race/gender etc. play a larger role than anything. I mean, look at the URM kids on SDN. Have more interviews than anyone haha
Really don't like either of these comments. There is a reason URM applicants are viewed with a slightly different lens. I echo your frustration about not getting the results we want, but do not look for others to blame. Hopefully this doesn't warrant further explanation and you both will understand the err of your comments...
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Really don't like either of these comments. There is a reason URM applicants are viewed with a slightly different lens. I echo your frustration about not getting the results we want, but do not look for others to blame. Hopefully this doesn't warrant further explanation and you both will understand the err of your comments...
[/QUOTE]I have to respectfully disagree with you here. There is no reason URM applicants should be viewed with any type of different lens (in my personal opinion). I very much understand that the medical community is trying to equalize the playing field in terms of race etc, and that SOME URM applicants may come from a disadvantaged background. However, this whole URM applicant bias is ludicrous. Doctors are doctors. I don't care if I go to a white, black, hispanic, Indian, blue, yellow, or purple doctor. As long as they're trained well and have fought hard to be where they are, I'm cool with it; it's a privilege to be a doctor. The fact that medical schools allow in any type of under qualified applicant due to race blows my mind. This is my personal opinion, and I'm sure you disagree. However, they were not wrong in posting their comments, and I don't see any "err" in their comments whatsoever.
That is 100% a thing that happens. I know people that its happened to. They're my friends, they're under qualified, they've gotten in because they use the race card (some of them are halfies and chose to use the one race for that reason).
I have to respectfully disagree with you here. There is no reason URM applicants should be viewed with any type of different lens (in my personal opinion). I very much understand that the medical community is trying to equalize the playing field in terms of race etc, and that SOME URM applicants may come from a disadvantaged background. However, this whole URM applicant bias is ludicrous. Doctors are doctors. I don't care if I go to a white, black, hispanic, Indian, blue, yellow, or purple doctor. As long as they're trained well and have fought hard to be where they are, I'm cool with it; it's a privilege to be a doctor. The fact that medical schools allow in any type of under qualified applicant due to race blows my mind. This is my personal opinion, and I'm sure you disagree. However, they were not wrong in posting their comments, and I don't see any "err" in their comments whatsoever.
Lol kid, I've already gotten into plenty of schools. Please, save the insults for someone who cares. By under qualified, I mean GPA, MCAT, clinical experience, research, and life experience.
You can imagine my chagrin for actually being a URM (black African) with a 3.9 cGPA and sGPA, a 516 MCAT (95th percentile), substantial clinical exposure, decent research, and essays good enough to get a top-15 interview. Problem is that I only got the 1 interview out of 18 schools. Don't know what more to do. It's a real confidence zap for me.
[/QUOTE]I have to respectfully disagree with you here. There is no reason URM applicants should be viewed with any type of different lens (in my personal opinion). I very much understand that the medical community is trying to equalize the playing field in terms of race etc, and that SOME URM applicants may come from a disadvantaged background. However, this whole URM applicant bias is ludicrous. Doctors are doctors. I don't care if I go to a white, black, hispanic, Indian, blue, yellow, or purple doctor. As long as they're trained well and have fought hard to be where they are, I'm cool with it; it's a privilege to be a doctor. The fact that medical schools allow in any type of under qualified applicant due to race blows my mind. This is my personal opinion, and I'm sure you disagree. However, they were not wrong in posting their comments, and I don't see any "err" in their comments whatsoever.
Seriously guys, what more can I do? I'm on track to graduate summa cum laude, have a good MCAT score, all the qualifications....my essay feigned interest from ONE elite med school, but yet I STILL can't even get an interview from anywhere else...
Or on WAMCI'd recommend starting a new thread on the pre-med allo forum. You'll probably get more attention/help on a dedicated thread.
I can't complain bc I have been accepted this cycle, but I have interviewed at multiple "top" schools and not heard anything and I really thought NYU would be it. I'm so so heartbroken and sad
misery loves company glad to know I'm not alone ahaha