- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 0
We need the cops to keep coffee and donut shops in business.
For one, corn products have more omega 6s than other types of processed foods, like canola oil. Omega 6s promote the formation of Group 2 prostanoids, which tend to be more pro inflammatory, and thus, worse. Omega 3's on the other hand, are the precursors to group 3 prostanoids which have a weaker inflammatory and clotting potential (one reason why people living exclusively on marine creatures tend to have pretty high risks of aneurisms)..
Also, beef fed on corn has less Omega 3 FAs in their meat, which means it is a little more pro inflammatory than it could otherwise be.
I understand where you are coming from, but isn't this a like saying eliminating crime would be a bad thing because then the cops would be out of business?
to play a little devil's advocate...
well i have a different support angle for the meat-eating bit...forget the large animal vets and their jobs... what about the cows? evolutionarily, they are a failure...we have manufactured an animal that cannot exist without our direct management. if we stop eating them...they'll pretty much stop existing. cows are nice, but they make pretty terrible housepets!
For you veggie people, are your significant others also veggie? If you don't have an SO yet, would you dateget serious with a omnivore? Just curious.
My hubby is also a veggie and I don't think I could be with someone who eats meat. Is is SOOO nice not to have any meat in our house ever! (minus the dry cat food.. but it's salmon )
... he thinks if you go that way you should be vegan.
I very strongly agree with this, IF you are a "moral vegetarian". If you are a vegetarian because of health issues, or don't like the taste of meat then I don't care. If you are doing it on moral ground, dairy cows and chickens used for eggs have the same treatment (some worse) then the meat livestock.
I'd be sick if I went vegan completely though and he doesn't understand that... I can't take pills (phychological... takes me an hour to take asprin) so I wouldn't be able to have supplements and I can't have that much fruit because of a condition I have... I could try it again but I won't until college at least but I guess health is a very minor part... considering I would have to buy my own groceries... and well that would even be limited.
Vegan, for almost 8 years now.
I don't take any supplements and while I love fruit, I don't eat it every day because it's so expensive. I'm about as healthy as it's possible to be, and proud of that fact!
Sorry, but one of my biggest pet peeves is people talking about how they became vegetarians for animal welfare. That is one of the most hypocritical things you can say/do.
Sorry, but one of my biggest pet peeves is people talking about how they became vegetarians for animal welfare. That is one of the most hypocritical things you can say/do.
One of the things that bugs me is people who claim that eating meat isn't natural, yet still eat eggs and dairy. Doesn't it seem more likely that our ancestors killed an animal and ate its meat rather than catching it and milking it?
Sorry, but one of my biggest pet peeves is people talking about how they became vegetarians for animal welfare. That is one of the most hypocritical things you can say/do.
I'm a tad confused. This statement (especially the use of "hypocritical") suggests that those who cut meat products out of their diet are somehow doing a dis-service to animal welfare. It's FAR from perfect, being since dairy animals are no better off -- but hypocritical? Confused. It's half way "there" but since when is something not better than nothing?
Unless you're suggesting that those who cut meat out of their diet are more likely to eat more eggs, consume more milk, etc -- that might be hypocritical... since those animals may be treated "worse," if you will. However, I don't think that applies to the vast majority of vegetarians.
You have to understand that I am speaking about moral vegetarians. There are people who talk bad about eating meat, how bad the animals are treated and yet they still choose to eat eggs and drink milk/eat dairy products. In no way am I saying this about all vegetarians, read all of my posts. I am saying it is stupid to talk crap about eating meat when you are not vegan. Don't criticize me because I am okay with eating the meat produced by the cow that you are drinking milk from or the chicken I eat which poduced your eggs. That is where the hypocritical portion comes in.
Sorry, but one of my biggest pet peeves is people talking about how they became vegetarians for animal welfare. That is one of the most hypocritical things you can say/do.
You have to understand that I am speaking about moral vegetarians. There are people who talk bad about eating meat, how bad the animals are treated and yet they still choose to eat eggs and drink milk/eat dairy products. In no way am I saying this about all vegetarians, read all of my posts. I am saying it is stupid to talk crap about eating meat when you are not vegan. Don't criticize me because I am okay with eating the meat produced by the cow that you are drinking milk from or the chicken I eat which poduced your eggs. That is where the hypocritical portion comes in.
I agree completely with you that being a "moral" vegetarian (as opposed to a moral vegan) is hypocritical. ( As animals used for eggs and dairy production usually live pretty crappy lives.)
But I'm a bit confused as to why this hypocrisy bothers you? If Sally was going to eat a bacon cheeseburger, but opts to eat a veggie burger with a slice of cheese, she is still supporting the farm industry, but there will be LESS suffering because of her choice. Perhaps not ZERO suffering, but less. And less is good, no? It seems pretty ridiculous to say, "Well, if I can't commit to being a vegan, I should just eat meat and cause a lot of suffering, because it would be hypocritical to cut down on my animal product consumption without eliminating it entirely."
My argument only holds up if vegetarians are not replacing the meat they would be eating with an equivalent amount of dairy. I think for the most part vegetarians do not do this -- I know few vegetarians that will grill and eat a 16oz slab of cheese. So, hypocritical it may be, but the consequences of a vegetarian diet are less animal suffering. In this case, we should be more concerned with outcome than with consistency.
Last time I checked, dairy sales did not positively affect beef cattle producers. Thus, your argument really isn't valid. Besides, if you are a "moral vegetarian" - its even more of a crock of **** what you're saying - I would much rather be a beefer in a feed lot than a chicken in a battery cage - as a general rule, beefers are better treated and the slaughtering process is humane.
1. no you did not say that dairy sales go to beef farms...you said that dairy is supporting the farm industry anyways, so what's the difference?
2. I don't think that they should get a pat on the back for "overall reduction of animal suffering". 3. Being a beefer isn't a great life, but its not that bad. And its a hell of a lot better than being a chicken. 4. I don't see where the suffering is - 5. all i see is that if someone did not eventually eat that cow, it would not exist. It never would have existed - cows are only around because people raise them - in the wild left to their own devices, they'd go extinct.
6. Now a chicken - that chicken suffers in that cage. And that veal cow - it suffers too. As does the force-fed goose. THOSE are the animal welfare issues that our vegetarian should be taking issue with. 7. No, instead our poorly informed Sally thinks she's doing some good by putting a farm out of business because she's taking the high road and not eating meat that came from a "suffering" animal.
You want to be a morally superior person, cut out veal and goose liver and eat only home-grown eggs. 8. You buy them in a store, you're no better than any other meat-eating person.
No, instead our poorly informed Sally thinks she's doing some good by putting a farm out of business because she's taking the high road and not eating meat that came from a "suffering" animal.
I'm sorry if you feel like I'm judging meat eaters. I'm not. In fact, I'm very pro-meat in places like Botswana (too much trouble to irrigate for crops, goats can eat scrub, people can eat goats). But I think meat eaters should be able to honestly introspect without getting defensive. $hit, I'm no animal welfare saint -- I still occasionally eat some dairy and eggs -- free-range expensive stuff from WF that is probably the "fake" free range kind anyways, eggs from local farm when I can. No one is a saint -- we're all trying to make this a world we'd like to live in -- some people by being veggie, some by giving to charity, some by working on human rights issues. People aren't BETTER than each other for the choices they make. That doesn't mean there aren't bad choices, good choices, and better choices.
The people I know that engage in energy and gas saving actions don't constantly tell me that they are better than I am.
It's the reverse for me - the vegans and vegetarians I know quietly just do their thing,
I think the big picture here may be that everybody has their own preference of food, whether it includes lots of animals, some animals, or no animals. We aren't going to get anywhere by belittling eachother. Let's just celebrate our diversity, eh?