Lol they did indeed reply with a harm to patients. You just didn’t understand it even after having it pointed out to you. Missing work, losing time, and spending money are all harms to that individual patient with the inappropriate referral you claimed not to harm. As well as clogging up the health care system as a whole with its finite resources, also harming the population in general.
What people
think we argue with physician-led care, by citing "the data show mid levels cause more harm to the patient," is
"PA's and NP's are actively trying to hurt the patient by stabbing them with a scalpel when they aren't looking. In fact, all nurses and PA's can f**k off because doctors can do all of the work they can do by themselves!" When, in reality, the argument is that NP's and PA's, when given unsupervised roles, will harm patients and the healthcare system by giving unnecessary tests, performing non-needed diagnostic procedures, and induce polypharmacy in patients. Quality of referrals is down and more people have to do the same/similar work than if a patient went to see a physician instead. I can go on with the amount of anecdotes I have of midlevels mismanaging the care of a plethora of family members throughout the years. And the mistakes they made vs. mistakes physicians make are not the same. The mistakes the midlevels made were
very rudimentary in terms of the knowledge base one needs to accurately dx and treat.
Yes, there are anecdotes of how multiple physicians couldn't diagnose the patient correctly and subjected a patient to unnecessary testing. This is why I will rely on my healthcare team to help bring care to the patient. As a future resident (and future attending,) I will lean on my colleagues (nurses, PA's, RT's, attendings, senior residents, etc.) to help me become a leader in healthcare. The experience they bring to the table will (hopefully) train me into a very competent leader in healthcare. But the leadership role comes with a price in schooling, testing, and training. And the 500-1000 hours received from NP school does not cut it. As I've said before, I will not tell a nurse how to do his/her/their job. I'm not trained/training in the nursing model of healthcare. But when you have people playing doctor (for whatever reason that may be,) then everyone suffers. I'm sorry, but getting experience as a bedside nurse for years and years and years
does not constitute a replacement for medical school.
I can't recommend the book "Patients at Risk" enough. I'm preaching to the choir with this comment, but this book succinctly argued every single topic this thread wants to talk about. Hell, it doesn't even bash nurses, PA's, CRNA's, and so on. It actually talks very highly of them.
Last note: I actually
hate the sentiment pushed by SDN that NP's are people who "couldn't make it into medical school." There is a podcast by the authors of "Patients at Risk" as well; they brought on an NP from North Carolina who talks out against midlevel encroachment. She practiced for years in an ICU setting before going to Georgetown's NP program. It's a "brick and mortar" school with a huge reputation for training great nurses at all levels. One thing in that podcast that opened my eyes to this is when she said "I could have gone to medical school. I took the pre-med prerequisites and made competitive grades. But at age 40, I just couldn't dedicate my life like that. That's why I went to NP school instead. I wanted to have more-solid knowledge base to help treat my patients."
Edit: the NP went on to discuss how, even with her reputable program, she and other students were not prepared to practice independently. The lack of standards really has her scared for future patients under the care of these future NP's. Even as the MODEL future NP that the AANP boasts is "what all NP's are (as a former bedside nurse with almost a decade of critical care bedside nursing before getting her DNP,)" she still didn't feel like she could practice by herself. She still needs to rely on physicians to treat the critical patients she works with every day.
This should show to us, med students and physicians, that nurses and NP's want to help patients.
Edit: what I mean is that they have good intentions, however they are misled from the start about their role and how they are just as good as physicians. Medical school is way more than just "get good grades, volunteer for a couple hundred hours, and spend thousands of $$$ to apply." For many people, it's just not feasible. So the NP route is a "better option" due to the fact that they can work FT while doing the program. But, to avoid having a circular case, it just isn't the same. The lack of standards has gotten to the point where, and I quote the NP from the podcast, "physicians looking to hire NP's
will not hire them if they went to certain programs. Because they know those programs are degree mills."