Official Step 1 High Yield Concepts Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Transposony

Do or do not, There is no try
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
999
Let's discuss our doubts/offer clarifications about mechanisms/concepts for Step 1

ASK ANY QUESTIONS here.

To kick start the thread here is something I didn't know:

1. Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are actually enzymes (transpeptidases & carboxypeptidases) which cross-link peptidoglycan. Penicillins binds to these enzymes and inactivating them thereby preventing cross-linkiing of peptidoglycan.

2. Periplasmic space (Gram -ve) contain proteins which functions in cellular processes (transport, degradation, and motility). One of the enzyme is β-lactamase which degrades penicillins before they get into the cell cytoplasm.
It is also the place where toxins harmful to bacteria e.g. antibiotics are processed, before being pumped out of cells by efflux transporters (mechanism of resistance).

There are three excellent threads which you may find useful:

List of Stereotypes

Complicated Concepts Thread

USMLE images

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
This is a good idea for a thread. I have a question:
If someone was diagnosed with Gonorrhea, would you treat only for Gonorrhea, treat for Gonorrhea and screen for Chlamydia, or treat both Gonorrhea and Chlamydia?

This question applies to someone who was diagnosed with Chlamydia as well - would you also co-treat Gonorrhea?

Kaplan Microbiology says to co-treat if you're diagnosed with one of them. SketchyMicro says treat for only the one your were diagnosed with, and if possible choose an answer that also screens for the other. Which is correct?
 
Treat both Gonorrhea and Chlamydia since they frequently co-infect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
What will happen in a patient with Acetaminophen ingestion with a P450 inducer?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
This is a good idea for a thread. I have a question:
If someone was diagnosed with Gonorrhea, would you treat only for Gonorrhea, treat for Gonorrhea and screen for Chlamydia, or treat both Gonorrhea and Chlamydia?

This question applies to someone who was diagnosed with Chlamydia as well - would you also co-treat Gonorrhea?

Kaplan Microbiology says to co-treat if you're diagnosed with one of them. SketchyMicro says treat for only the one your were diagnosed with, and if possible choose an answer that also screens for the other. Which is correct?

You always treat for both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Treat both Gonorrhea and Chlamydia since they frequently co-infect.
You always treat for both.

Treat for both only if gram(-) diplococci are seen on gram stain. If you see nothing, you only Tx for chlamydia cuz you know gonorrhea isn't there. I think one of my slides years ago had an error in it where I said you Tx for both regardless, but it's only if you see the diplococci.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Conditions in which you see schistocytes (5) vs spherocytes (2)?
Intravascular (schistocytes) v/s extravascular hemolysis (spherocytes).
Intravascular (schistocytes) : Microangiopathic hemolytic anemias ( DIC, HUS, TTP ), PNH, mechanical valve
Extravascular hemolysis (spherocytes): Hereditary spherocytosis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia.
Haptoglobin levels decreased in intravascular and normal in extravascular hemolysis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Treat for both only if gram(-) diplococci are seen on gram stain. If you see nothing, you only Tx for chlamydia cuz you know gonorrhea isn't there. I think one of my slides years ago had an error in it where I said you Tx for both regardless, but it's only if you see the diplococci.

Didn't know this. We've been taught that you treat every chlamydia infection for both :(.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Just wanting to make sure on this one.. Goljan RR lists "Factor V deficiency" as a cause for hypercoagulability. It should say "Factor V Leiden" instead, right?

V deficiency = bleeding
V Leiden = clotting
 
Just wanting to make sure on this one.. Goljan RR lists "Factor V deficiency" as a cause for hypercoagulability. It should say "Factor V Leiden" instead, right?

V deficiency = bleeding
V Leiden = clotting
Yes
 
Hmm tacrolimus, niacin, gatifloxacin, thiazides...
Thiazides, Diazoxide, atypical antipsychotics, etc
Any drug (e.g. as above) or condition (i.e. hypokalemia) which keep the beta cells hyperpolarized i.e. keep the K+ channels open will lead to hyperglycemia over a period of time.
Unless the K+ channels are closed (or IOW the beta cell depolarizes) there will be no calcium entry to stimulate insulin release.
Tacrolimus has a slightly different MOA as well as other mechanisms for insulin resistance. It binds to an intracellular protein, FKBP-12, and forms a complex with calcium, calmodulin, and calcineurin since calcineurin is expressed in the beta cell. So, less calcium to stimulate insulin release from beta cells.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Treat for both only if gram(-) diplococci are seen on gram stain. If you see nothing, you only Tx for chlamydia cuz you know gonorrhea isn't there. I think one of my slides years ago had an error in it where I said you Tx for both regardless, but it's only if you see the diplococci.
Makes sense.
Although some books still mention treating for both IIRC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
In a patient on Proton Pump Inhibitors the Gastrin levels will go up which will induced release of histamine from ECL-like cells.
So is is correct to say that a patient on Proton Pump Inhibitors will have raised histamine levels?
My question is, do these patients have other (systemic) symptoms related to raised histamine since the PP is already blocked or histamine metabolized quickly?
 
Last edited:
Intravascular (schistocytes) v/s extravascular hemolysis (spherocytes).
Intravascular (schistocytes) : Microangiopathic hemolytic anemias ( DIC, HUS, TTP ), PNH, mechanical valve
Extravascular hemolysis (spherocytes): Hereditary spherocytosis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia.
Haptoglobin levels decreased in intravascular and normal in extravascular hemolysis.

Nice.

Was thinking DIC, HUS, TTP, mechanical hemolysis and HELLP syndrome for schistocytes (obviously the list wouldn't be limited to that).

For spherocytes was thinking hereditary spherocytosis and drug-/infection-induced hemolytic anemia (which is basically autoimmune as you've said).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Only ones I can think of are vanc (rapid infusion) and caspa/micafungin. I think there's one more though? Niacin is via PG release, so not niacin.
Polyenes (Amphoterrible) and Meperidine.
Good point regarding Niacin.
 
Maybe we can make this a HY concepts in pharm thread? Then make new threads for path, micro, etc?
 
Maybe we can make this a HY concepts in pharm thread? Then make new threads for path, micro, etc?

I like this idea. @Transposony do you have privileges to change the thread name to Official Step 1 HY Pharm Concepts Thread?

What do people think about me making individual "HY ___ Concept" threads? Yea or nay?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
What non-peptidoglycan inhibiting drugs have anti-pseudomonal activity? I have 6-7 drugs in mind.

And what (one) carbapenem does not have anti-pseudomonal activity?
 
Maybe we can make this a HY concepts in pharm thread? Then make new threads for path, micro, etc?
Seems like a good idea but I am not sure since then you will have to look for a specific thread to post a question.
Here, you can post whatever you like and also on the real deal it's all random concepts!
 
What non-peptidoglycan inhibiting drugs have anti-pseudomonal activity? I have 6-7 drugs in mind.

And what (one) carbapenem does not have anti-pseudomonal activity?
Fluoroquinolones.
Ertapenem

Which Fluoroquinolone has anaerobic activity?
 
What is the most differentiating feature between Atropine poisoning, TCA overdose and Amphetamine toxicity since they all have s/s of sympathetic over-activity?
 
Reason for the difference in blood lactate levels between Von Gierke and Cori disease?
 
it's like all these drugs are second nature to you guys. did you all continually review them after learning them the first time in class?
 
Flushing, dryness, urinary retention, agitation, constipation, mydriasis.
Great.
To summarize the differentiating feature are:
Atropine poisoning --> dry skin (Muscarinic block as sweating is sympathetic muscarinic mediated)
TCA overdose --> dry skin with arrhythmia and hypotension (Muscarinic and alpha 1 block)
Amphetamine toxicity --> warm and sweaty skin (as sweating is sympathetic muscarinic mediated)
They all have s/s of sympathetic over-activity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
did you all continually review them after learning them the first time in class?
It's a continuous process and fun since it one of those rare Step 1 subjects which you are actually going to use in clinical practice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top