lol, most of the things you listed as reasons to hire a lawyer directly relate to another lawyer causing trouble.
So anytime a lawsuit is filed, it's just a "lawyer causing trouble"? Oh, I see. Something tells me you won't quite stick to your guns if, god forbid, you were ever harmed by someone and your only recourse was the legal system. Don't you think it's possible (let me answer for you, it is, and this is shown in hundreds of years of academic literature) that the vast majority of lawsuits that are filed have at least some validity to them, and therefore it was the defendant who is actually the one "causing trouble"?
It would be like having 80% of all physician visits being related to second opinions or correcting problems that other physicians cause. The ideal medical malpractice solution would be to have lawyers involved as little as possible - because lawyers tend to make the case about everything other than the actual pertinent facts (by doing things like having witnesses cry on the stand, having children testify about how much they miss their mother, etc). These are all sad things and important social phenomena, but they have nothing to do with whether Dr X killed the patient by not taking her gallbladder out in time.
That testimony would be for damages, not for liability. I think most people are smart enough to know that a kid missing their mommy isn't proof of malpractice. However, a kid whose mother was taken from them is certainly 'injured' by that, wouldn't you say? And if the defendant is liable, shouldn't the kid be compensated for that injury?[/QUOTE]
The main reason to hire a lawyer these days is to make sure another lawyer doesn't screw you. That's a sad statement about the legal profession.
How about when you want to start a business? All those legal documents have to be prepared by someone. When you get a new employment contract? Only a fool wouldn't have it read by an attorney before they signed it. What about planning your estate to ensure that your money and assets go where you want them to, with as small a fraction as possible going to taxes? What about when your medical practice and another want to merge?
It's not about screwing each other, it's about professional responsibility. A lawyer has the responsibility to represent their client to the fullest extent possible by law. A society can't function without laws, laws can't function without an adversarial legal system, and an adversarial legal system can't function unless both sides have someone trained in the legal system to advocate on their behalf.
And way to go, take a statement and imply that he/she meant that all lawyers suck and there is never any need for one.
Are we reading the same post? Clearly that is what they meant.
Just because 20% of what lawyers do isn't redundant or unnecessary or overly expensive doesn't mean the other 80% doesn't matter. By your logic, all physicians would suck because there are some who do procedures only for profit or who are untruthful to their patients. Good for you that you do some probono work (although "no money up front" doesn't really count). Unlike lawyers, doctors can get sued for refusing to do probono work.
Are you seriously implying that 80% of lawyers spend their time filing frivolous lawsuits? If so, you have no idea how the legal system functions, or the distribution of lawyers in it. A vast number of lawyers (more than 20%), myself included, have never and will never set foot in a court room.
I wasn't talking about probono work, I was talking about contingency work. Like it or not, contingency work allows cases that otherwise would NEVER be brought to happen and people that would have never been compensated for wrongs done to them be compensated. Lawyers can't get sued for refusing probono work, but they can certainly be sued for malpractice after they take it on. This is just like physicians, who (unless they work in a hospital ER, I believe) are allowed to turn away patients whenever they want for inability to pay. It's once you do the good deed that you open yourself to liability, and that's true for doctors and lawyers both.