...Podiatry is indelibly a procedure-heavy field since we treat the local manifestations of systemic diseases. No one board is more important but they need to be unified as every podiatrist should be skilled and examined in ALL aspects of the medicine and surgery we perform. Put the boards together: American Board of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, boom. ...
This sounds like an incredibly easy solution.^
Your thinking is not unsound, but at your stage in the game, you don't know what you don't know.
You probably feel much different by DPM graduation day, even moreso by residency graduation, even moreso once out in practice.
Having everyone skilled and examined in all (99%) of aspects of their speciality is what MD programs do. Yes. That's the dream.
On the flip side, read the pod residency reviews thread. Talk to upperclassmen. Go out on your 3rd year local rotations and your clerkships. There are
night and day differences in DPM residency programs. There are programs that do almost nothing but cut toenails and wound consults, many slop their way through diabetic cases (even for their "RRA" numbers), and others are doing much bona fide RRA trauma, others have many private elective recon cases... some have it all. Some have amazing attendings, but many have few or none. Likewise, the residencies will have tremendous variation in their in-training scores and board pass rates.
Even way before that, the pod schools are not selective on admissions... and they have different standards for graduation as well. Some try to be selective, but they all need to fill their seats. Most take measures of remediating students, accepting nearly anyone who did basic pre-med. You then have a mix of students who pass classes and national boards easily... and others who fail repeatedly. That will carry into residency match. That will carry into board exams. Some of those students who struggled even become "leaders" in podiatry. Podiatry is much more variable in terms of end products than MD, and that's mostly because of the loose admissions and evolving residency quality/variability. You will come to realize that unfortunate reality.
...So, what should it be:
-Make the tests (board exams) easier so all pass?
-Make the training better and more standardized in terms of volume/diversity? (this would mean closing and reduced spots at MANY programs)
-Make the admissions stricter to get better students who will become better residents? (this would mean closing pod schools, not adding)
...No easy answers, huh?
MD schools and programs choose all except the first option. They have very strict admissions criteria. They keep a residency surplus but regulate training to true teaching hospitals with verified case volume and monitor results. You just don't see them having VA hospitals or tiny community hospitals without real GME suppport be residency sponsors, quad scrubbing cases, programs with big deficiencies of certain surgery/pathology, whipping up bogus fellowships to try to compensate for a large % of residencies being inadequate. Ergo, MD board pass rates are good, they have much more uniform competencies, and they enjoy significantly better job markets.