- Joined
- Nov 3, 2006
- Messages
- 354
- Reaction score
- 12
Research publication is much more impressive than winning a position in a club (which is essentially the same as winning a popularity contest...very pointless and "high school like" IMO). Plus I just don't like speaking in front of crowds...if I really care about the people in my class and care about being popular in school then I could do that crap too....but again I think its very pointless.
I know I'm a couple of days late but this post just seems really naive. There are myriads of reasons why one can relate holding a or "winning" a position to being the right person for a job. There are reasons it is used as a tool, it's not just for play.
First of all, the first thing that reflects from such experience is the ability to persuade people. Yea it seems so high school, but if you were able to convince people about where you stand with your views and what you would do for an organization, and you get voted, it demonstrates persuasive skills and communication skills. Is speaking in front of crowds the only thing getting a leadership position is about? And how are you going to persuade a room full of physicians, nurses and other hospital staff during an in-service to adopt a certain protocol that you have "researched" to be 98% effective? So you don't care about people in your class. Are you gonna care about the colleagues you work with?
There is a lot to be learned from school leadership. Getting people to do stuff when they really do not want to, being entirely responsible for certain tasks to be accomplished, reporting to people, and generally working in a team. And for the most part, you would run into the same issues when working in a team-based model work enviroment. And that experience will come in. Do you know what it means to be hated as a leader? I have seen people's attitude towards other people change, people become more respectful, and people come to appreciate others just because of the stuff they went through holding some position. For some people, it really does change them and teaches them how to be better adults.
I'm sure like you said you already have all the good qualities of a leader and you don't need to prove it. But the person trying to hire you does not know that, and they can't just take your word for it without proof.
Your views pretty much depict the fact that clubs/organizations are pointless, not realizing that they have actually contributed to where some things are the way they are in the profession today. I'm sure you wouldn't make your views about this as obvious in an interview, because it wouldn't fly. A lot of people take this stuff seriously. Both research and leadership experience are equally important. If anything, research contributes more to the academic aspect of things. If one already had a high GPA, I would put research under the same bracket....it is a notch more scholarly work. I think experience in one or the other or both aspects can equally show how much dedication a person has, but one is definitely not very pointless.