- Joined
- Mar 31, 2009
- Messages
- 149
- Reaction score
- 3
Most, by a significant amount, will always be people doing it in two years. I think the major reason to the GMS program in one year is if you have more than enough research experience packed under your bag. Even then, you probably won't matriculate quicker than the 2 year track people.
Georgetown, for example, emphasizes applying during the first year and then getting into a relevant/affiliated medical school. Unless you hunt down a program specifically meant for that circumstance/situation, it will still still take 2 years before you matriculate into a medical school.
As far as "being done" with the program. The first year is pure academic and the second year is more or less research/thesis. If you do it in one year, the first year is pure academic, then the two summers you spend writing your library thesis.
Not too sure what other negative things there are. You'd have to mention it. I haven't seen/heard anyone have a problem due to doing a library thesis (unless you have very little to no research experience and decide to go this route).
Georgetown, for example, emphasizes applying during the first year and then getting into a relevant/affiliated medical school. Unless you hunt down a program specifically meant for that circumstance/situation, it will still still take 2 years before you matriculate into a medical school.
As far as "being done" with the program. The first year is pure academic and the second year is more or less research/thesis. If you do it in one year, the first year is pure academic, then the two summers you spend writing your library thesis.
Not too sure what other negative things there are. You'd have to mention it. I haven't seen/heard anyone have a problem due to doing a library thesis (unless you have very little to no research experience and decide to go this route).