I think we already know the answer to this if you strip away the utter nonsense that gets wrapped in a typical RO residency.
What are you actually doing day to day. See consult sim contour manage on treatment and send off. Memorize target volumes, dose constraints and nccn guidelines. Throw in some statistics to memorize and presto. The rad bio rad physics nowadays is a joke at most places especially the biology portion as nobody is actually actively looking at it.
So back to the question, how qualified do you need to be to competently perform this specialty. On the spectrum of physician tasks that are performed day in and day out…we really aren’t special.
This needs to be repeated, over and over.
RadOnc is not special. It is not any more or less difficult than any other specialty in medicine. However, we're not born knowing how to treat people with radiation. It's a skill that needs to be learned.
For 20 years now, RadOnc has been filled with people with excellent grades and tests scores. While those metrics don't predict who will or will not be a "good" physician (however that's defined), grades/scores generally predict who will be better able to teach themselves from books/papers with little guidance. Being able to "easily" memorize a textbook isn't inherently "good" or "bad". It's like how some people can sing or paint while others can't - it is what it is.
However, being able to memorize a textbook means you are more equipped to survive an environment where few are interested in actually teaching you. I did my intern year in a traditional Internal Medicine program. The difference in my experience there vs RadOnc was ASTOUNDING. I remember PulmCrit fellows had these 5 minute chalk talks they would give unprompted on rounds. Senior medicine residents would randomly have short teaching sessions in the team room. Attendings on service would come to the floors after their clinics to check in and do their own 5 minute chalk talks.
That almost never happened in my residency. Most of the time it was just me, my laptop, and eContour. Like the majority of people who Matched before the bubble burst, I have a natural ability to memorize books on my own. I made it work. It wasn't ideal, and it wasn't what I thought residency would be.
This is my concern for the incoming classes of FMG/IMG/people with lower board scores and grades. Do I think they can be great Radiation Oncologists? Yes, absolutely. But MOST PEOPLE require teaching and guidance to learn a profession, and the more complicated a profession is (like modern medicine), the more teaching and guidance is required.
I'm glad RadOnc crashed in competitiveness. It's the start of a wake up call after many years of resting on laurels. However, I think the pain is only beginning. I'm worried people who would otherwise be amazing Radiation Oncologists are going to struggle because residency programs haven't had much pressure to focus on the "education" side of the "service for education" equation that was supposed to be the agreement between institutions and trainees.
The next decade is going to be interesting.