Yeah, the pod schools have basically created one or two residencies each.... maybe 2-5 spots per school per year, and they aren't very strong programs.
Temple (3/yr) , Barry (3/yr and 1 fellow/yr), Kent (10/yr??), and AZPod (3+2/yr) are the only I even know for sure are officially sponsored by the pod school and put their brand on the residency.
There are programs in the cities where CSPM, Rosalind, NYCPM, and DMU are... but I don't know how linked they are.
Western Univ DPM program didn't make any spots/program that I'm aware of.
You can learn anywhere, but none of those are high quality spots that I would've applied to.
So, saying that the new TX school will make spots for 20ppl in less than 5yrs is wild. Saying they'll be quality spots is a total pipe dream. That is the main issue and hole in the new school. I agree.
...personally, podiatry has treated me well. It's a good gig, decent hours, chance to help ppl, etc. When I say "treated me well," it may have something to do with top 25% of pod class, top 25% residency training, etc. It is absolutely NOT a slam dunk, though. It is fairly akin to Caribb MD school or chiro in that not everyone gets good residency, some areas are saturated, etc. It probably would have been even harder in chiro. I don't know. Cream always rises to the top? Sure... but some mixes are tougher... and their top is lower.
Making a DPM school without residency spots can re-ignite the dumpster fire of a substantial number of grads getting bad residency or NO residency. That is rough. It is not needed. USA population growth has flatlined (most other 1st world countries have been neg for awhile). Why the new school(s)? Money money money money... munnn-ayyyy! So yeah, I would understand it more if there were many quality residencies unfilled... good hospital DPM jobs unfilled? As it stands, those conditions don't exist.