has anyone ever heard of a hospital that will allow a licensed non-BE doc to work there?
No, however there are probably some rural areas of the country desperate for any help they can get that would privilege you to work there.
has anyone ever heard of a hospital that will allow a licensed non-BE doc to work there?
yes.
as long as they have an active state license, active dea and are enrolled with medicare, medicaid, and all of the companies that are the 'advantage' carriers in the state they wish to practice.
Hospitals arent comparing MDs against NPs, they want everybody to have a piece of paper behind their name and title that says "certified" regardless if the certification is trash or not.
Hospitals get sued frequently if someone on their staff ****s up and it turns out they arent "board certified." It also invites media and public pressure on their facility and credentialing process.
If we made up a new job called "magic witch doctor" and started putting them in hospitals, it's only a matter of time before hospitals start demanding that all "magic witch doctors" are "board certified" by some sham "accreditation" organization, even if it's completely dubious and an obvious sham. They do the same bull**** with naturopaths, chiropractors, acupuncturists, and the rest of the charlatans. Its a stupid exercise at putting up a front to stave off inquiries by malpractice lawyers, media, and government organizations.
You can imagine (RIP) Mike Wallace on 60 minutes doing a sensational show and getting outraged that none of Podunk Hospitals' 30 doctors are board certified. Thats the kind of BS the hospitals are responding to. Even if the certification is an absolute joke, it's the necessary golden ticket to get admission.
The real blasphemy is that there are bridge programs for PA to MD, but yet there is no reciprocal bridge for non-BE/non-licensed/non-BC MD to PA.
the PAs on these forums make all kinds of ridiculous excuses as to why there's a double standard at work here, but it is obvious that its the same kind of of protectionist racket dribble that they accuse us of using to limit their scope of practice.
These are the places where you can work:
1. Most rural places -- they're so desperate to find people they cant be picky.
2. Indian Health Services
3. Some VA locations, depending on how "desirable" the location is (e.g. Los Angeles, forget about it)
4. Urgent care clinics
First, blasphemous doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.
Second, the real issue is lability. Under the law, you get held to a higher standard with a higher degree. Meaning as an MD, you are going to be held to the same standard of care of the typical physician working in whatever field you work in. So if you moonlight in an ED, as a licensed physician, you are going to expected to meet the level of the average ED physician, not someone who is a GP with one year of experience. An NP or PA gets held to the standard of care expected of someone with that lesser level of education, so it's a much lower standard, even if the task is the same. So the risk to that individual, the hospital and the medmal carrier is lower. That's why non BE physicians are a problem -- they simply don't have the training commensurate to the level of liability and legal expectations they incur. So it's simply better to have someone with average training and knowledge for an NP working at a hospital than it is to have a doctor with below average training, even if their training is better than an NP.
I can think of five physicians off the top of my head that I know of that don't have board certification with very different reasons. When you ask what can you do ully licensed without boards...
1. General practitioner in an inner city employed position - all outpatient. Completed med school 20-30 years ago, did a year of internship then went into practice because he did not come from money and had to pay back loans and make a living.
2. "Internal Medicine" inpatient/outpatient/nursing home/home care doctor/entrepreneur son of wealth doctor who just didn't pass his certifying exam after us MD and accredited residency and moved on with life to become a very wealthy man in his own right.
3. Foreign trained MD + internal med residency US citizen, not off shore, did fellowship at a top name US place, not eligible for us boards. Works for sallary in a very strict system doing hospital work. I was surprised the system her only 3 years ago, I thought she would have a hard time moving jobs.
4. Foreign trained MD critical care doc, never trained in US but was hired about 15-20 yrs ago as full faculty. When the hospital system was bought out about 10 yrs ago, rules changed and they asked him to do retrining in the us, he refused and sued them and lost, now does home care.
5. Offshore MD with US medicine residency, either never certified or not recertified, works for IPC doing nursing homes.
will medicare or medicaid reimburse non BE BC physicians?
So you are saying that as a licensed physician I could open a clinic that caters to medicaid/medicare patients and self payers only? why dont more people do this. Can anyone else clarify or elaborate on this please, becuase as a person who intends on only doing outpatient medicine, why not just bail on residency now, and just open a private practice?
maybe someone should be bold enough to make an MD to PA bridge program. it could seriously work. then there will be in existence the smartest PA's ever.
Yes they sure can. I dont know why more people don't do this. u could even open up ur own clinc. if ur business savvy u could make a killing. i am not so great at advertising so i have small patient base in my home care company, but i make enough money to survive. i could even work for a visiting physician company, but i'd rather make all the money rather than a percentage. i think it is the overhead costs that scare most doctors off so they work for companies that take a chunk of the money they make. most of my patients come from home care companies that need referrals. it is legit according to medicare standards. don't bail out just yet because its just better to have BE/BC status, just in case things dont' work out with ur own business and u can jump onto another career. but just remember, these companies that hire you are making a ton of money you could be making by yourself..just get a biller and go on with your bad self.
I do not know this as a fact (just hear-say), but I was told that most programs will want you to complete two years minimum at their institution. I realize it's only 1 more year, but that's still a significant opportunity cost.Docu, was that two years in the same residency program? I wonder why you couldn't transfer to complete your third year. It isn't that uncommon.....
Yes they sure can. I dont know why more people don't do this. u could even open up ur own clinc. if ur business savvy u could make a killing.
I do not know this as a fact (just hear-say), but I was told that most programs will want you to complete two years minimum at their institution. I realize it's only 1 more year, but that's still a significant opportunity cost.
I did nearly 2 years of training in total and got licensed. I am an img so there is a longer time requirement to licensure than an Amg (unfair to say the least). I'm not board eligible because I didn't complete residency and can't take the boards because of not finishing.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using SDN Mobile
I have to disagree with you here sir. The reason I would hope that IMGs take longer to meet the min. requirement of licensure is because we don't know the caliber of all of the medical schools in the world (for example look up Oceania University of Medicine) and with AMG's you know that each one of them has met the min. amount of training deemed appopriate by their society.
How do you advertise to get patients?
not to change the point but I went to a foreign medical school which has been assessed by the california state medical board and deemed an equivalent education, which is why graduating from the school i attended you can practice in all 50 states. Wouldnt the fact that it is deemed euivalent by the CA state medical board (which is the standard nearly every state uses), and the fact that I passed (with flying colors) the numerous United States Medical Licensing Exams suggest that I am "equivalent" in my training to a US grad. Im a US citizen and went abroad and I find the fact that I have to go through 2 more years of training before Im even eligible for licensure almost discriminatory. There is no difference between me and the other AMG residents in my program (except that I had to work twice as hard to get where i am right now).
i completely agree. after you complete all USMLEs and do the exact same residency as an AMG you should be considered as equivalent. i wonder how to file that as discrimination. not to mention the entire military requires an IMG or FMG to have 1 year of residency (12 consecutive months in one program) before they can be in a military resident but not an AMG. could it be a class action lawsuit? or file with the EEOC as unequal pay (http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/equalcompensation.cfm and http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/fs-epa.cfm ) just curious.
not to change the point but I went to a foreign medical school which has been assessed by the california state medical board and deemed an equivalent education, which is why graduating from the school i attended you can practice in all 50 states. Wouldnt the fact that it is deemed euivalent by the CA state medical board (which is the standard nearly every state uses), and the fact that I passed (with flying colors) the numerous United States Medical Licensing Exams suggest that I am "equivalent" in my training to a US grad. Im a US citizen and went abroad and I find the fact that I have to go through 2 more years of training before Im even eligible for licensure almost discriminatory. There is no difference between me and the other AMG residents in my program (except that I had to work twice as hard to get where i am right now).
...
L2D, I had a quick question for you. In an earlier response, you made it sound like non-boarded doctors would be held to the legal standard of their field. My understanding was that we're actually held to the "community standard," so that a practice in one community (e.g., family practice physician covering an ICU) might be acceptable in a rural setting, but harder to defend in an urban setting where specialists are readily available. I'm not sure if this distinction is relevant to the OP, but is this right?
today i knew what a hemorrhoid looked like and got this lady some surgical intervention. lol..the nurse practitioner misdiagnosed it , didn't refer the patient to a surgeon, and treated her for UTI just cuz there was blood in her urine. which subsequently caused her a sinus infection. this is why the gov needs to make 15,000 residency spots to fill the doctor shortage instead of replace them with NP's and PAs.
today i knew what a hemorrhoid looked like and got this lady some surgical intervention. lol..the nurse practitioner misdiagnosed it , didn't refer the patient to a surgeon, and treated her for UTI just cuz there was blood in her urine. which subsequently caused her a sinus infection. this is why the gov needs to make 15,000 residency spots to fill the doctor shortage instead of replace them with NP's and PAs.
today i knew what a hemorrhoid looked like and got this lady some surgical intervention. lol..the nurse practitioner misdiagnosed it , didn't refer the patient to a surgeon, and treated her for UTI just cuz there was blood in her urine. which subsequently caused her a sinus infection. this is why the gov needs to make 15,000 residency spots to fill the doctor shortage instead of replace them with NP's and PAs.
We need more doctors!!! say no to the NP/PA take over.
That seems weird, but I had a friend of mine who went to one of those clinics and was treated with antibiotics for strep when she actually had mono. :\ She got ampicillin, and the awful subsequent rash ensued. She freaked out, went to the ER, which cost her insurance a nice chunk of change, and her doctor laughed about it. Meh, the gov is its own worst enemy sometimes. Not sure I agree with 15,000 more spots but noctors is definitely not the way to go.
No offense, but to use that as an argument doesn't make sense. it is known that if you get a rash with ampicillin, its mono, but usually a doc doesn't check for mono when it seems so simple, that is understandable, it is even in usmle world questions as commonly seen in medical practice. all u really can do is laugh, you won't get in trouble for it. its nothing serious, not even an allergy.
noctors are the replacements for the doctor shortage if we don't fill it with doctors.
the lady was on cipro for 7 days for the UTI, which caused immunity to bacteria, which in turn possibly caused the sinus infection (OR it could have hapened on its own but it happened while she was on cipro). it is a valid argument, since when you give flagyl for BV you can in turn get a yeast infection. its an infection tradeoff when it comes to high doses of ABX for prolonged periods of time. additionally, the first line treatment for UTI is TMP-SMX or nitrofurantoin. the NP gave her second line as cipro. and giving it for bloody urine doesn't seem right. don't you have to work that up? i dont think it was.
the lady was on cipro for 7 days for the UTI, which caused immunity to bacteria, which in turn possibly caused the infection. it is a valid argument, since when you give flagyl for BV you can in turn get a yeast infection. its an infection tradeoff when it comes to high doses of ABX for prolonged periods of time.
No, it's not. It is not a valid argument at all. It barely even makes sense.
Do you even understand that pathogenesis of bacterial sinus infections?
how do you get a yeast infection from taking antibiotics, even abx for sinus infections like ampicillin? same difference.
it is known that if you get a rash with ampicillin, its mono
the lady was on cipro for 7 days for the UTI, which caused immunity to bacteria, which in turn possibly caused the sinus infection (OR it could have hapened on its own but it happened while she was on cipro). it is a valid argument, since when you give flagyl for BV you can in turn get a yeast infection.
its an infection tradeoff when it comes to high doses of ABX for prolonged periods of time. additionally, the first line treatment for UTI is TMP-SMX or nitrofurantoin. the NP gave her second line as cipro. and giving it for bloody urine doesn't seem right. don't you have to work that up? i dont think it was.
Do you know the difference between yeast and bacteria?
Always? Really? It couldn't possibly be an allergic reaction? Ever? I'm not saying that the mono/amp connection doesn't exist (although I've never personally seen it), but are you arguing that there is no such thing as an allergic reaction to PCNs that manifest as a rash? Because I've seen a metric f***ton of those (and experienced it myself).
You are so far off the reservation here I don't even know where to start. In fact, I probably shouldn't. And yet...like the proverbial trainwreck, here I go.
Did she have culture-proven, cipro-resistant bacterial sinusitis? If so, then yes, your evaluation is absolutely correct? If she didn't (which I'm going to go out on a limb and assume is the case), she probably had a viral sinusitis (as the vast majority of sinus infections are viral). Even if it was a bacterial sinusitis (again, less likely), it was likely "true, true and unrelated" rather than being due to the rise of a virulent, cipro-resistant bacterium in the sinuses. Also...immunity and resistance are two different things.
Please don't ever give Macrobid for anything. While Bactrim is considered 1st-line empiric therapy for UTI, Cipro is indicated anywhere that there is a reasonable level of resistance to Bactrim (like where I work...do you know your regional abx-resistance patterns? You should), Cipro should be first line. While Macrobid kind of works (and is safe in pregnant patients), it's kind of a joke.
And yes, hematuria deserves more of a workup, but what else was in the UA?
I'm all for keeping patients safe from incompetent noctors but I'd also like to keep them safe from incompetent doctors.