- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Messages
- 9,907
- Reaction score
- 10,037
You don't use that word? It must be a guy thing.
Or an inconsiderate thing. Use it in your head or with your buddies all you want. It has no place on SDN in that usage.
You don't use that word? It must be a guy thing.
It's considered an offensive slur.You don't use that word? It must be a guy thing.
I've had this multiple times so far for the touchy-feely classes, not the basic science ones though. My school loves abuse and addiction for some reason.I'm pretty surprised they had that as a standardized patient as a 1st or 2nd year. I feel like schools generally try to avoid issues like that for the earlier parts of your career. We had ones about relationships affecting illness, but not involving violence.
Of course, in public (mainly bc there are women around). Among men, not so much (unless one of them had a child who was special needs).It's considered an offensive slur.
Bc they can't test you on the science/physical diagnosis stuff yet, bc you haven't completed it. The touchy feely stuff - domestic violence, EtOH abuse (CAGE questions), taking a sexual history, can always be tested easily - more to check for bedside manner.I've had this multiple times so far for the touchy-feely classes, not the basic science ones though. My school loves abuse and addiction for some reason.
Well that's the problem right -- you don't know whom around you has a child, other family member or friend with an intellectual disability. It's best to avoid using those terms regardless of the social situation.Of course, in public (mainly bc there are women around). Among men, not so much (unless one of them had a child who was special needs).
I've had this multiple times so far for the touchy-feely classes, not the basic science ones though. My school loves abuse and addiction for some reason.
I'm pretty surprised they had that as a standardized patient as a 1st or 2nd year. I feel like schools generally try to avoid issues like that for the earlier parts of your career. We had ones about relationships affecting illness, but not involving violence.
True. It's usually more said in jest - i.e. "Quit acting like a ______" - when someone does something dumb. Not with intended malice.Well that's the problem right -- you don't know whom around you has a child, other family member or friend with an intellectual disability. It's best to avoid using those terms regardless of the social situation.
We had domestic violence SP's in 2nd year. They tend to avoid that in 1st year as you're still learning your bread and butter histories then. 2nd year is when we got the harder-hitting cases like violence, drug abuse, angry patients, angry parents of patients, complicated sexual histories, etc.
Yes, same here. The non-medical-science cases throughout M-2. It's to test you on communication skills and that you pick things up.We had domestic violence SP's in 2nd year. They tend to avoid that in 1st year as you're still learning your bread and butter histories then. 2nd year is when we got the harder-hitting cases like violence, drug abuse, angry patients, angry parents of patients, complicated sexual histories, etc.
Why?can't wait
Yes, same here. The non-medical-science cases throughout M-2. It's to test you on communication skills and that you pick things up.
Oh I know malice is almost never meant. We unfortunately have some users however who have no idea of "time and place";True. It's usually more said in jest - i.e. "Quit acting like a ______" - when someone does something dumb. Not with intended malice.
LOL. What do you mean didn't approach it correctly? You mean he'd get angry if you didn't catch on that he was using cocaine?Especially with the drug abuse. We had a couple SP's with drug abuse in MS1, but that was mainly to teach us how to take an adequate social history. The drug abuse cases in 2nd year were much more detailed and clearly required more attention and history-taking skills. The one was a cop with recent onset palpitations and chest pain, and you had to tease out that he was an undercover cop in narcotics who had started using cocaine. But the people who didn't approach it correctly had the guy blow up in their face.
I had a whole new level of appreciation for the SP's after 2nd year. The level of acting was excellent.
LOL. What do you mean didn't approach it correctly? You mean he'd get angry if you didn't catch on that he was using cocaine?
Oh, that's a great SPs. Ours weren't as good, to react that way. More rubric like - like Step 2 CS.No. I'm not sure how SP sessions are set up at other schools, but at mine, most of the time you are in a group with 4-5 other students and 1-2 facilitators, so the students are watching you interact with the SP and then everyone gives you feedback. Usually we would only cover 2 cases in an afternoon session, so 2-3 students talk to the same SP back to back. It sucks going anything but first, because you already know what's going on, but you have to pretend you don't and just practice taking the history as if it's brand new to you. So the people who went 2nd and 3rd already knew that he was an undercover cop using cocaine, but they jumped into it extremely quickly without establishing any rapport and took him off guard. Pretty sure you should ask clarifying questions about his chest pain before asking him if he's ever done drugs on the job.
Oh, that's a great SPs. Ours weren't as good, to react that way. More rubric like - like Step 2 CS.
Why?
Ok fine, I won't use the word "****" anymore here.
I'd venture that most of us were not familiar with that term.But also I'm surprised nobody here has called me a "sperglord" (slur for someone with Asperger's) yet. Perhaps I was wrong about what this forum thinks of me.
It's almost as if you have a book of offense of terms in front of you and are just going through them one by one until someone calls you on it.
I had no idea what that even was. It sounds like a Harry Potter character.But also I'm surprised nobody here has called me a "sperglord" (slur for someone with Asperger's) yet. Perhaps I was wrong about what this forum thinks of me.
I had no idea what that even was.
I've never heard of that slur before and certainly would never use it towards anyone with aspergers. I've heard aspie before but always thought that was an okay term. If you find it offensive I will stop using it.Ok fine, I won't use the word "****" anymore here.
But also I'm surprised nobody here has called me a "sperglord" (slur for someone with Asperger's) yet. Perhaps I was wrong about what this forum thinks of me.
I've never heard of that slur before and certainly would never use it towards anyone with aspergers. I've heard aspie before but always thought that was an okay term. If you find it offensive I will stop using it.
Btw I know the possibility for DV, Substance abuse is there for our first year standardized patients. Perhaps it's different for me because I'm actually a trained DV/SA advocate so I know how to handle those situations better than your average medical student. What's important to note is, victims of intimate partner violence don't wear signs on their forehead saying "I'm being abused" they come in all different genders, races, socioeconomic status, etc. They also may have never told anyone about their abuse before and will likely minimize what's going on, "he only hits me when he's really mad, he's never hit the kids, it looks worse than what it is" while you should make it clear you are concerned about them, just saying "he's a monster, leave him" will cause them to shut down and not trust you. You can't expect them to just leave right away, it's not that simple and it's one of the most dangerous times for them right after they do chose to leave (the other time is if they are a woman who becomes pregnant). Also you can't really "get them" to leave, they have to want to of their own accord.
Maybe u should stop labeling people as black or white, good or bad, nice person vs. hater. Dichotomous compartmentalization is what toddlers do.My point was that I thought people here were haters, I'm surprised that even though people criticize me a lot , they haven't started harping on that particular point.
In this case, perhaps the standardized patient lady was just a bad actress. I may be socially oblivious, but even I know that you need to approach this topic with some finesse and tact, which they still have not taught us how to do. In any case, I did my best, and then the lady was a hater.
Unless we're talking politics, then virtually everyone is a toddler.Maybe u should stop labeling people as black or white, good or bad, nice person vs. hater. Dichotomous compartmentalization is what toddlers do.
No. Adults realize that everything is not black and white and that there is gray.Unless we're talking politics, then virtually everyone is a toddler.
Can we get back to what really matters here? Partying hard?
You are expected to have finesse and tact before you come to medical school.As I understand it, "Aspie" is a normative term, while "Sperglord" is a pejorative term for a man with Asperger's (who tend to be much more vocal on the internet than "Spergladies," I suppose).
In this case, perhaps the standardized patient lady was just a bad actress. I may be socially oblivious, but even I know that you need to approach this topic with some finesse and tact, which they still have not taught us how to do. In any case, I did my best, and then the lady was a hater.
You should spend some time in the SPF lol. I intentionally present views contrary to what's going in in every given thread just for the sake of discourse (what's the point of preaching to the choir?) and get hated on as a 'murrica hatin' librul dat wants to steel der' guns, whether I'm disagreeing with a moderate, liberal, or libertarian view. It'd be hilarious if it didn't make me completely lose faith in the ability of people to use reason during the process of political discourse.No. Adults realize that everything is not black and white and that there is gray.
The only SPF I know is Sun-Protection Factor.You should spend some time in the SPF lol. I intentionally present views contrary to what's going in in every given thread just for the sake of discourse (what's the point of preaching to the choir?) and get hated on as a 'murrica hatin' librul dat wants to steel der' guns, whether I'm disagreeing with a moderate, liberal, or libertarian view. It'd be hilarious if it didn't make me completely lose faith in the ability of people to use reason during the process of political discourse.
I may be direct but I try not to be purposefully hurtful (I don't always succeed). Taunting you because of your reported Aspergers would be hurtful.My point was that I thought people here were haters, I'm surprised that even though people criticize me a lot , they haven't started harping on that particular point.
is it really hard if it is a SP, nahWe had domestic violence SP's in 2nd year. They tend to avoid that in 1st year as you're still learning your bread and butter histories then. 2nd year is when we got the harder-hitting cases like violence, drug abuse, angry patients, angry parents of patients, complicated sexual histories, etc.
My point was that I thought people here were haters, I'm surprised that even though people criticize me a lot , they haven't started harping on that particular point.
is it really hard if it is a SP, nah
Wow! Those are good. Your school must pay them well.Our SP's are really good, so yes it got harder near the end of 2nd year. One of them was a mom of a terminally-ill kid who was in our face yelling at us and was almost impossible to console. Not many people succeeded with her. Another was a mom with her teenage daughter (the patient) and the mom was adamant about not leaving the room. It took me a solid 5 minutes to convince the mom to leave. I probably could have done something differently, but that's the point of the SP sessions.
Wow! Those are good. Your school must pay them well.
Ok fine, I won't use the word "****" anymore here.
But also I'm surprised nobody here has called me a "sperglord" (slur for someone with Asperger's) yet. Perhaps I was wrong about what this forum thinks of me.
Yes: http://www.autismspeaks.org/dsm-5/faq#aspergerAsperger's is no longer a thing. DSM5 got rid of it. Now you just fall somewhere on the autism spectrum.
Get her drunk and see where things go, I think.
At least that's what I've heard you're supposed to do. Not exactly sure how it works, and it seems sorta sketch to me.
You are expected to have finesse and tact before you come to medical school.
I doubt the SP was a bad actress or a "hater" I have a feeling that there were clues that you missed (asking if she feels safe in her home is a standard question -I get asked by every doc I've ever seen. Also did you have access to her chart? Had she been to the ER multiple times for injuries? Again just asking her relationship status isn't enough, there is a whole line of questions in the social history you are supposed to ask)
Developing a rapist's wit won't get you far.
Lol nah they don't give you anything with a SP, they just throw you in there without any warning. And yeah, we can talk a big game about the exact questions we should ask, but then remember that you woke up early in the morning to go do a history on this SP while your mind is on your upcoming Neuro exam rather than this stuff, and then you'll see why people's histories are less than perfect.
Also, I think you expect borderline social wizardry from med students, but quite a few people here are even more socially awkward than I am rofl.
Lol, I don't plan to rape any peeps.
The only illegal things I've ever done involve torrenting Goljan and various music products.
Although I may consider getting on Testosterone, I heard it's quite helpful.
Helpful for what in your case?Although I may consider getting on Testosterone, I heard it's quite helpful.
Although I may consider getting on Testosterone, I heard it's quite helpful.
Wait, are you going to start roiding?
Helpful for what in your case?