Favorite members who got banned

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you think we should allow a non-vet member to go to the vet forum and berate them in their home forum?

It's the same here. When Vets or Docs drop by just to harass us they get an infraction.
The only reason there was any "berating" going on was because of the completely hostile response to an innocent inquiry. I did NOT go there to troll and did not begin any personal attacks until I myself was attacked. I've not seen anyone on the pharmacy forum jump all over a non pharmacist unless they were obviously trolling. But you are a mod. Justify your arbitrary godlike powers of administering "justice" if it makes you feel good.

I also did not realize that "vets hate us" and apparently pharmacists aren't at all welcome in their little slice of ego stroking. Won't make that mistake again either.

Over time I'm starting to realize what a douchathon SDN really is.....

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
You can discuss errors with the team without saying who did what exactly as everyone would benefit from understanding what happened so it doesn't happen again.

Everyone can see when people are banned. It's no secret. What is there to say other than don't be an asshat who types crap like 'AsIanS aRe ThE MoSt RaCiSt' of 'if you are black you are x times more likely to commit such and such crime than if you were white" (lrn2statistics)
This happens all the time in team huddle pharmacy meetings. Discuss the issue without mentioning names.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
But you are a mod. Justify your arbitrary godlike powers of administering "justice" if it makes you feel good.

My apologies. I thought you wanted a discussion of your infraction. You may vent about the unjustness of your infraction if it makes you feel good. ;)
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 user
Interesting. When one tech makes a med error do you tell all the other techs about it so they can learn from it?

Actually yes. We have a staff meeting every week and if there was an error, they tell everyone what happened without mentioning names. This makes sure everyone learns from it and it usually never happens again for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Actually yes. We have a staff meeting every week and if there was an error, they tell everyone what happened without mentioning names. This makes sure everyone learns from it and it usually never happens again for a long time.

But that’s not what happening here. How can I tell people what got him in trouble without mentioning his username? Lol
 
I don't blame him for believing that. There is just so much evidence about shady things that happened during that event, it's just so undeniable that things were covered up.
It wasn't believing that which got him in trouble, it was telling another poster to F off.

I assume, I don't know for sure but that's what I'd wager.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
But that’s not what happening here. How can I tell people what got him in trouble without mentioning his username? Lol

This is an anonymous forum, you aren't mentioning anything about an actual person. Banning a person doesn't actually do anything since they can just create a new account.

And yes I go over any errors with my staff.

Interestingly, if you search "*****" there are a ton of results. The word ***** can be seen as offensive.

It can't possibly be because of the cursing. Many people including myself have shortened or used symbols to represent curse words
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
It wasn't believing that which got him in trouble, it was telling another poster to F off.

I assume, I don't know for sure but that's what I'd wager.

If it was that obvious then why can't the mods just tell us?
 
I once put up a post up in the veterinary forums asking why so few vets will see exotic patients (in my case specifically reptiles). I've found there to be a real shortage of qualified vets who will treat the non fuzzy animals. Anyway, I went on to tell a story of one of my pets- a bearded dragon that had a disease called "Yellow Fungus" which is considered ultimately fatal and not treatable (it is NOT- I am proof)). I told a story of several vets telling me the only solution was to euthanize the animal. As this was a young, otherwise healthy animal, I didn't want to accept this. To make long story short, I compounded an anti fungal med and successfully treated the animal which has been in complete remission for several years. I shared this story on the vet forums, thinking naively that maybe someone would appreciate the info on HOW I treated the animal. Yes, I am naive.

Rather than commend my passion and efforts for helping the animal, the vets jumped all over me about "practicing veterinary medicine" (when no local vet would help me other than offering to kill my pet) and generalizing that all reptile owners are essentially a bunch of under educated idiots. They also said some terrible things to me that they assumed about me as a pet owner which I took great offence to. It was implied that if a licensed vet told me to euthanize an animal then I should never have questioned that (how dare I!) and simply killed the animal WHEN I KNEW I COULD DO BETTER. What unbridled arrogance. As a result of this, I responded with anger at the idiocy I was experiencing, which got me a warning and a temp ban for calling out the ethics of the *****s who attacked me. They were the majority and I was seen as the offender. Whatever.

My first response was to tell the mods here to shove their inconsequential forums up their respective asses. I don't know about everyone else, but this forum is used by me only for my amusement. If it shut down tomorrow I would not shed a tear. I really was tempted to tell them to simply remove my membership all together. But I took some time off and returned. Not sure why. Morbid curiosity? Perhaps.

Since then, I've just assumed that all mods are douches who will side with the majority of f*cktards just to keep the MAJORITY of forum members happy. Probably a good rule of thumb. Don't harass the idiot pharmacy snowflakes on their forum by giving them a much needed dose of reality. Don't call out the vets on their forum for their greed and lack of ethics. I had a great deal of respect for the veterinary profession till that day. Fortunately, I still know a few good practitioners in the "real world". Fine to the rest. And f*ck you. You know who you are. X

I know exactly what you mean. As a new dog owner a few years ago, I had a question about a particular vaccine and whether it was needed for my dog at her age. Before I knew it, vets jumped all over me and started calling me an antivaxxer and a bunch of other names... I was honestly shocked and confused lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Wow. Yeah so much for tapping into their professional expertise....LOL And I know you're not supposed to solicit medical advice, but my post initially only questioned why there are so few vets who will see "exotics". The answer in a nutshell was "there's not enough money in it and exotic pet owners are typically deadbeats anyway". Nice. Pretty innocuous question, at least to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
If it was that obvious then why can't the mods just tell us?
A few years ago I seem to remember them saying they were going to start being a little more open about that sort of thing. Not sure what happened there, assuming my memory is accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
A few years ago I seem to remember them saying they were going to start being a little more open about that sort of thing. Not sure what happened there, assuming my memory is accurate.

You have a good memory! But it's hard to teach an old dog new tricks and I often defer back to respecting member's privacy, which is how I was trained.

I don't mind letting everyone know when we ban a returned troll or something like that, but in this case it is a post hold and I don't think it would be right of me to violate the member's privacy by telling everyone else what they did. The member is question can do so when his post hold expires if he wants. That's totally up to him.
 
When is his hold over?

If it's because of cursing that is wrong and everyone that curses should be put on hold.

I hope it was something actually bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Just wondering but why does it matter if you get banned from this site? Do you guys do business through here or is this place somehow the only place where professionals can discuss things? I don't mean to be mean or anything but tough ****. You got banned from a website, move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
When is his hold over?

If it's because of cursing that is wrong and everyone that curses should be put on hold.

I hope it was something actually bad.

I guess you can curse; just not at someone.

Acceptable: Today f%#%% sucked!

Unacceptable: You are f%#^% stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I guess you can curse; just not at someone.

Acceptable: Today f%#%% sucked!

Unacceptable: You are f%#^% stupid.

Apparently, telling everyone tough **** is acceptable too.
 
If it was that obvious then why can't the mods just tell us?

Probably this. Listing reasons that black people are inherently criminal was likely a bridge too far.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 users
Probably this. Listing reasons that black people are inherently criminal was likely a bridge too far.

Okay that makes sense. Why can't the mods just say he posted something with racism?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
They're just trying to keep us from flinging too much **** at each other. It's the only thing that sets us apart from the monkey cage at the zoo.....
 
No one mentioned Zpak?

Hmmm, not that you mentioned it, Zpak has disappeared?

And whatever happened to the guy who regretted not being a doctor because he wanted to make a lasting accomplishment for the world, he had a dancing Kung Fu Panda as his avatar?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
They're taking us all....one by one....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
I just now realized that there was a report button... I could not imagine using it...

I have used it a few times for obviously spam.

The only time I used it for a real post, was a disturbing new user post by someone who was clearly having psychological issues. I thought twice about doing that, but I was concerned for the safety of the poster and anyone around them.

But other than, I say let the entertaining catfights and battle royale commence!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Hmmm, not that you mentioned it, Zpak has disappeared?

And whatever happened to the guy who regretted not being a doctor because he wanted to make a lasting accomplishment for the world, he had a dancing Kung Fu Panda as his avatar?

I forgot about him! He was a hoot sometimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
wait... so are we just going to ignore the fact that BMB just got banned?!?!?! What the hell is wrong with all of you mods?!?!?! Let’s just ban everyone and all you mods can finally be happy and just talk amongst yourselves!!!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 6 users
wait... so are we just going to ignore the fact that BMB just got banned?!?!?! What the hell is wrong with all of you mods?!?!?! Let’s just ban everyone and all you mods can finally be happy and just talk amongst yourselves!!!

He is?? Who's gonna argue with wagrxm in the investment thread now??

I must be next!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
wait... so are we just going to ignore the fact that BMB just got banned?!?!?! What the hell is wrong with all of you mods?!?!?! Let’s just ban everyone and all you mods can finally be happy and just talk amongst yourselves!!!

See, I kinda get why the mods don't want to discuss why someone was banned, but usually it is obvious. I can't imagine why BMB was banned?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Without BMB this forum would die. Bring him back ASAP
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Insurance doesn't cover that
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
So long to all you banned people!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
He posted a video of someone dying. Graphic violence is completely unacceptable.

I don’t know what he posted, and I’m in agreement, but...

George Floyd was graphically murdered on camera, a video like that is clearly in the public interest. I hope no one gets banned for posting examples of police brutality within the correct context of discussion.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
If it’s a video of George Floyd then it’s all over the internet. Everyone and their mother have seen it by now. There is nothing wrong about it.
 
BMBiology removed? Wow.
He posted a video of someone dying. Graphic violence is completely unacceptable.


Like another said, zero context provided, and this video is available everywhere on the internet. Why would it be any different to post here?

It sounds like a rash decision. Mods banned a member with like 8000 posts, for that? What is this forum becoming?
 
From my time as moderator (except for someone who succeeded me), it usually was not one thing that gets you banned but a repeated series of edge behavior. Outside of something extraordinarily egregious, it's basically a repeated warning system until the moderators "vote" on the borderline cases. The moderators do have unilateral ban rights but can be overriden later.

What I am saying is that one event is usually not enough, it is a pattern.

And my moderator time came to an end when I got trolled off years ago and just stopped responding by someone who is now banned.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users
Like another said, zero context provided, and this video is available everywhere on the internet. Why would it be any different to post here?

Pornography is all over the internet but no one posts that on here either.

If you would like context, the video was of retired CPT David Dorn who was shot by looters stealing from a pawn shop. The video shows the 77 year old gasping for air while blood drains from his body onto the sidewalk. All the while (despite the language in the background) other viewers are seen escaping and jumping into their vehicles and taking off (minus of course the very guy standing their getting the video of the retired captain slowly gasping until he takes his last breath). To reiterate, the video has been blocked (or attempts I should say) on facebook / youtube / twitter and yet some people still try to circulate the recording.

Now that you have context, you think that type of clip belongs on the SDN forum? I wouldn't be surprised if a few of our users would actually try to subjectively debate as to why this would be appropriate for a site catered to students (I am sure it'll be brought up).

As stated, it takes more than just one event that ultimately leads to being banned. For many, multiple post holds multiple warnings and multiple secondary warnings are just not enough I suppose.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users
Pornography is all over the internet but no one posts that on here either.

If you would like context, the video was of retired CPT David Dorn who was shot by looters stealing from a pawn shop. The video shows the 77 year old gasping for air while blood drains from his body onto the sidewalk. All the while (despite the language in the background) other viewers are seen escaping and jumping into their vehicles and taking off (minus of course the very guy standing their getting the video of the retired captain slowly gasping until he takes his last breath). To reiterate, the video has been blocked (or attempts I should say) on facebook / youtube / twitter and yet some people still try to circulate the recording.

Now that you have context, you think that type of clip belongs on the SDN forum? I wouldn't be surprised if a few of our users would actually try to subjectively debate as to why this would be appropriate for a site catered to students (I am sure it'll be brought up).

As stated, it takes more than just one event that ultimately leads to being banned. For many, multiple post holds multiple warnings and multiple secondary warnings are just not enough I suppose.

multiple warnings? What else has he posted that needed to be warned? I can’t think of any and I check this site pretty often.
And I don’t think you even understood the other posters’ question... they were asking for why he posted that video. What provoked him? Was it posted as a response to another poster? They didn’t ask you to give a detailed graphic description of what the video was about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Pornography is all over the internet but no one posts that on here either.

If you would like context, the video was of retired CPT David Dorn who was shot by looters stealing from a pawn shop. The video shows the 77 year old gasping for air while blood drains from his body onto the sidewalk. All the while (despite the language in the background) other viewers are seen escaping and jumping into their vehicles and taking off (minus of course the very guy standing their getting the video of the retired captain slowly gasping until he takes his last breath). To reiterate, the video has been blocked (or attempts I should say) on facebook / youtube / twitter and yet some people still try to circulate the recording.

Now that you have context, you think that type of clip belongs on the SDN forum? I wouldn't be surprised if a few of our users would actually try to subjectively debate as to why this would be appropriate for a site catered to students (I am sure it'll be brought up).

As stated, it takes more than just one event that ultimately leads to being banned. For many, multiple post holds multiple warnings and multiple secondary warnings are just not enough I suppose.
Agreed. Not everything important or true needs to be posted here in the open forum
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Again, why do people care about this so much?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Perhaps it's the idea that people make mistakes and should get a second chance.

If someone wanted to discuss pharmacies' vulnerability to robbery or a recent spate of pharmacy robberies, it wouldn't be appropriate to post CCTV footage of a pharmacist shooting and killing a robber
 
Perhaps it's the idea that people make mistakes and should get a second chance.

If someone wanted to discuss pharmacies' vulnerability to robbery or a recent spate of pharmacy robberies, it wouldn't be appropriate to post CCTV footage of a pharmacist shooting and killing a robber

Well, it sounds like he was given repeated warnings and 2nd chances.

Someone else what else had he posted that was questionable, since they hadn't seen it. I assume, those questionable posts were quickly removed, like this questionable post was removed.

This is a subject specific forum, I think banning death videos is reasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
RIP Bmbiology

Not really sure who I'm going to reply to anymore.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
He should just make a comeback with a new account.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Again, why do people care about this so much?

This forum is dying. Same topics being discussed forever (death of pharmacy, terrible job market etc.).

So, when one of the more interesting posters gets banned, it directly affects the forum quality which is already down the drain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top