Agree. It’s just hard not to shoot them a judgemental look when we’re talking about healthy diets on rounds....
Is it that hard for you to hide disdain for people, the way their lives have worked out, or their choices? I recommend that this is a skill you should develop preferably before 2nd year of residency, if not earlier.
Are you saying we shouldn’t bring up the weight issues with our patients?
I don't know anyone who says that. I'm technically in the obese range. I bring up weight and diet with every patient at least annually.
Some methods work, and you need to actually expand on
why someone finds calorie counting, exercise, etc. difficult. Their lives vary significantly. If you're working 14 hrs a day at a desk, your chances of having 30-60 min/day for exercise is different than someone working 6 hrs a day. Your advice to each of those people will vary.
Calorie reduction is absolutely the way to handle things, but saying that someone should only eat steamed vegetables and 3 heads of lettuce is ridiculous.
Thanks for clarifying. I agree that shaming people for losing weight is an extreme that is actually contradictory to the underlying message of HAES. Although,
there are some data out there that intentional weight loss can increase mortality... The idea that a high BMI on its own is harmful and having a lower BMI is always better is where things aren't as clear cut. Statistically speaking, yes, higher BMIs are correlated with increased risk of cancer, heart disease, etc. There are well established links there. But when I am looking at an individual patient, their BMI doesn't really tell me how healthy they are. Their cholesterol, BP, glucose, etc. could look amazing (
maybe not likely at a BMI of 45, but not improbable), and unless there are other weight related issues going on (joint pain, sleep apnea, intertrigo, etc.), I don't know if I have enough evidence to say that the high BMI itself is harmful, and that weight loss is going to be beneficial.
Anecdotally, I've seen a couple of people with BMIs of 45+ with perfect cholesterol, BP, CMPs, and A1c's of 5%. They win the genetic lottery. I have pretty impressive alterations in my labs when my diet hits >1400 cal/day or my BMI goes above 32.
Speaking from experience, this is very much the case with the poor in the US. So many poor in the US are obese because unhealthy food is such a cheap source of pleasure.
Its not just the fact that bad food is a cheap source of pleasure. Its the fact that it is
cheap, food is essential for life, and healthy options are both more expensive and very difficult to find in poor communities (i.e. in some cases you'd have to drive 30-45 min to find grocery stores that even offer fresh fruits and vegetables). Its not just the fact that its a source of pleasure.
As for the trolling part, I think most of us have said things we later regretted on the internet in general and likely SDN in particular. I know some of the things I said here in my med school days now make me kind of ashamed. Luckily there was no one around to deny me a future as a doctor because of it.
Absolutely a universal thing.
Later that week another patient, same height and roughly the same weight except this patient's stomach stuck out a good 8-9 inches further than his chest. He did get an exercise and healthy eating discussion.
Honestly, I've seen people that are built like trucks (big arms, big legs, etc.), whose labs are terrible, and once they lose some of that mass they suddenly no longer have elevated LFTs, insulin sensitivity improves, etc. I still talk to those people about their lifestyles and screening labs, because its possible their bodies simply aren't meant to have that amount of mass or they're doing something unhealthy to maintain it.
"The extent of misclassification of weight status that we found, coupled with the strength of the association between weight self-perception and ease of counseling, may help to explain why looking at BMI alone as a predictor of counseling patterns has yielded conflicting results (9–11,13,15,16). Rather than actual BMI, it may be the perception of weight that more influences counseling. Although likely difficult, helping pediatricians overcome personal weight-related obstacles may enable them to become better counselors for achieving healthy weight in their patients."
The statement from the abstract that you must have seen:
"Results. Significant differences were found for patient receptiveness to counseling for treatment of illness (P 0.038) and health advice (P 0.049), with the patients of nonobese physicians indicating greater confidence scores. The difference for weight and fitness counseling did not reach significance (P 0.075)."
That's my only point from that article.
What are you basing that statement on? The fact that they were published in medical journals with significance numbers and conclusions kind of implies that they were indeed meant to draw conclusions.
You haven't really addressed the part where the sample size of that second paper was 5 pediatricians and only 2 characterized themselves as overweight. That's a pretty small sample size. Even if the p < 0.0005, I'd have trouble making any generalizable conclusions from that.