- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 15,455
- Reaction score
- 6,726
Ah, Flynn's notes. Every graduate from Florida to Washington had a copy of that thing.
Ah, Flynn's notes. Every graduate from Florida to Washington had a copy of that thing.
I’m really curious what her civil liability will be. I think scorned test takers are well within their rights to sue.
Good luck collecting, unless she has substantial assets, she’ll be unemployable. She can probably work at Goodwill, at least that’s a non-profit.
Sent from my iPad using SDN
Yep....her name is out there..
Can someone provide us with the link to the story?
You mean as opposed to those license applicants whom she and whoever else was involved ****ed over? I'm sure they all have a story.
The BOP's response is akin to the power company shutting off electricity to prevent wildfires. Oh wait...
No story as in no details of what happened. She will have to defend herself in court. That is when the details will come out.
Can someone provide us with the link to the story?
From Reddit:
“Update - I practice in CA and work with someone who knows this person, and she is actually most likely innocent. Turns out she was writing down some acronyms to jog her memory on her scratch paper during the exam, and the proctor suspected it was cheating, but she didn’t have anything on her and didn’t try to leave with her paper. Her residency program believes she is innocent as well, and she has a lawyer to fight this. Apparently the actual exam breach is a related to a different person or group of people.
Just trying to spread this knowledge so her life isn’t ruined forever!”
From Reddit:
“Update - I practice in CA and work with someone who knows this person, and she is actually most likely innocent. Turns out she was writing down some acronyms to jog her memory on her scratch paper during the exam, and the proctor suspected it was cheating, but she didn’t have anything on her and didn’t try to leave with her paper. Her residency program believes she is innocent as well, and she has a lawyer to fight this. Apparently the actual exam breach is a related to a different person or group of people.
Just trying to spread this knowledge so her life isn’t ruined forever!”
From Reddit:
“Update - I practice in CA and work with someone who knows this person, and she is actually most likely innocent. Turns out she was writing down some acronyms to jog her memory on her scratch paper during the exam, and the proctor suspected it was cheating, but she didn’t have anything on her and didn’t try to leave with her paper. Her residency program believes she is innocent as well, and she has a lawyer to fight this. Apparently the actual exam breach is a related to a different person or group of people.
Just trying to spread this knowledge so her life isn’t ruined forever!”
Do you know if the proceedings are public? I know the actions are, but beyond that I think cases are appealed to an administrative law judge, and not actual open court (like traditional court)
Maybe lord999 can weigh in, or someone else. I always see board actions but never the defense used.
Not sure if I have to request those in writing.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN
From Reddit:
“Update - I practice in CA and work with someone who knows this person, and she is actually most likely innocent. Turns out she was writing down some acronyms to jog her memory on her scratch paper during the exam, and the proctor suspected it was cheating, but she didn’t have anything on her and didn’t try to leave with her paper. Her residency program believes she is innocent as well, and she has a lawyer to fight this. Apparently the actual exam breach is a related to a different person or group of people.
Just trying to spread this knowledge so her life isn’t ruined forever!”
No, executive session in CA (not to protect the rights of the accused, the Board has an egregious tendency to mistrial from the past), and like the last couple of times, the defense will post, although the earlier UCSF case, I think you knew why there was no testimony needed. The order is the only artifact although there are circumstances where it would be public.
Saying something about the Prometric proctor, they are obligated to not let you take out paper or artifacts. But they are not supposed to judge your use of it even if it's suspicious like AABDDE. You were taught in my era (and at present) that if you didn't remember some stuff that you immediately jotted it down before Question 1. Had to do that with SAMPLE in First Aid, the half life order of benzos, the HIV exceptions at the time, and a couple of the PK equations (which ironically I still have all of that memorized today). Either that Reddit poster is a liar who didn't remember procedure or Prometric is going to face massive liability from one or more parties. But it can't be that simple, a Board member or the Executive Director or Inspector is required to immediately adjudicate these irregularities at the exam session before the candidate exits the testing center (yes, that one of the actual functions of the Board and why ATT schedules must be done during their office hours). That's why I should be skeptical, because even the stupidest proctor needs an additional mistake from the CA Board. I can't believe it's just a proctor error.
I heard there is supposedly a strike going down at CSHP Seminar this week. Anyone know about this?
There is always the option to get licensed out of california
All the test takes have two days to take the exam?! Are the testing centers not going to be filled to the brim? Do they even have capacity for that kind of volume?
I guess a two day time frame will make it hard for people to share questions with each other. Although I am willing to bet not many of them will this time around.
14000/month?
thats like 87/hr? 40 hr/week, for 4 weeks.
Doubt majority of pharmacist don't get near that.
Pharmacists at Kaiser in SF are making around that or more$14,000 per month? Where they get those stats?
As of right not, only 11/16 is open to retake. 11/17 lands on a Sunday which are when PSI centers are closed. All the centers in CA are filled and people have to fly out or drive to another state to take the exam. Texas is one of the states that has spots left currently. I don’t know how they except to have spots for 1,400 people for one day.All the test takes have two days to take the exam?! Are the testing centers not going to be filled to the brim? Do they even have capacity for that kind of volume?
I guess a two day time frame will make it hard for people to share questions with each other. Although I am willing to bet not many of them will this time around.
14000/month?
thats like 87/hr? 40 hr/week, for 4 weeks.
Doubt majority of pharmacist don't get near that.
In San Francisco? After adjusting for cost of living, what is that, like, $40k?Pharmacists at Kaiser in SF are making around that or more
Well all of you at the BoP had a good run. No doubt this is heading to be a political matter and since all of you are appointed by the Governor and he most certainly doesn't want to use his political capital for this so I'm sure his advisors are telling him to clean house and distance himself from any controversy.
Meet the new faculty coming to a startup pharmacy near you.
Gregory N. Lippe
Allen Schaad
Ryan Brooks
Lavanza “Kercheryl” Butler
Shirley B. Kim
Valerie Muñoz
Ricardo Sanchez
Maria D. Serpa
Deborah Veale
Albert C. M. Wong
In San Francisco? After adjusting for cost of living, what is that, like, $40k?
In San Francisco? After adjusting for cost of living, what is that, like, $40k?
14000/month?
thats like 87/hr? 40 hr/week, for 4 weeks.
Doubt majority of pharmacist don't get near that.
14000/month?
thats like 87/hr? 40 hr/week, for 4 weeks.
Doubt majority of pharmacist don't get near that.