What can be reasonably gathered from the email is a confirmation that the school was not granted full accreditation this year. He says its confidential, but one has to think if it was good news, he would probably share it with everyone immediately. Additionally, it seems sketchy with everything else thats been going on that the "official" public release date of the decision is 7/24, and the tuition deadline for fall semester just happens to be due 7/23...
I agree that there is a lot of shadiness on the part of the school with all of this. Big thanks to whoever contacted APCE and got them to update the site early. Given the information we have, I think the class of 2016 especially has to take the next couple of weeks to seriously explore other options. With the school not being accredited, it has only one more chance in June 2013. But obviously there is no guarantee, and having failed once already (twice if you count the delay from pre-candidate to candidate), what confidence should we have right now that it will succeed next year.
One thing I am unsure of is regarding graduates who pass the Naplex with the school under candidate status. If what he says is true, then the class of 2016 would be able to sit for the Naplex upon graduation. But as some have stated already, would our licences be any good if the school is unaccredited? And even if they are, would anyone want to hire a pharmacist from an unaccredited school?
Currently I'm leaning towards not going anymore because given what we now know, the risk seems too great. This is extremely disappointing, but at the very least for the class of 2016, we have the opportunity to cut our losses without a significant financial burden but nothing to show for it.