- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,381
- Reaction score
- 4,530
For those new to the saga, APMSA returned what is essentially sponsorship money from the ABPM to the tune of $80,000 and announced it in a letter just last week. That letter contained several factual inaccuracies. A post was made detailing the connection between ABFAS and APMSA, aka the APMSA executive director Marit Sivertson, JD. A quick aside, if anyone doubted that my claims were true, then WHY HAS MARIT SIVERTSON'S INFORMATION AND PICTURE BEEN REMOVED FROM BOTH THE APMSA WEBSITE AND THE MINNESOTA PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION WEBSITE? You are all smart folks, you know exactly why that information has been scrubbed from the internet. It's because it was true and they are trying to hide it. Any ways...
ABFAS released the following letter today:
The APMSA letter was ALL the students idea and they had no input from anyone else. Certainly not their executive director or any ABFAS board members...
About that student letter. It made the following claims:
"Dr. Lee Rodgers, President of ABPM, has posted negative, unprofessional, and misleading commentary on the Student Doctor Network"
@heybrother already outlined this part in a thread that was killed. But we all know this is factually incorrect. To the chagrin of many posters here, he has been the biggest podiatry cheerleader on these boards and led the original charge to get practicing docs to come to these forums and tell prospective students how wonderful the profession is. He's the only "leader" who is actively trying to change the messaging on these forums for prospective students. There are no APMA, ABFAS, CPME, APMSA, COTH, etc. representatives anywhere to be found. It has been literally EVERY OTHER poster on these forums who has said that we are saturated with a lousy job market, and that we should be shutting down nearly half of the residency programs in the country and only graduating around 200 students per year.
"The ABPM has also commenced litigation that has serious ramifications for the profession. It has done so without regard for the autonomy of state associations, and it intends to continue its pursuit of legal action across the country."
Also incorrect. No litigation in the state they are talking about was ever made. Not to mention, there is a 0% chance that a single podiatry student in the entire country has knowledge of state licensure or scope proceedings. Not without being educated by someone who has a stake in the outcome of said licensing rules. For those of you unaware, Oregon required ABFAS RRA cert to perform ankle surgery in the state. The state organization was too chicken to follow through with their request to drop that wording from state licensing rules and so the ABPM made the request to the state Medical Board. The real physicians in the state of Oregon and other members of the Medical Board agreed that the language should be dropped, as no other healthcare provider in the state is required to have any particular board certification in order to obtain a license. In fact, allowing ABFAS to dictate who can do what in the state of Oregon actually takes autonomy away from the state and puts it into the hands of a 3rd party organization that the state has no authority over. Again, the students have no idea what they are talking about but there is one organization with a particularly vested interest in keeping the status quo (hint: its ABFAS).
Another aside, in regards to this particular ruling, here is a quote directly from the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery: "A valid medical license is required to be Board Certified, but certification is not necessary for licensure." Someone should tell ABFAS that the real foot and ankle surgeon's specialty board would disagree with their position in the case of Oregon's Podiatry licensing.
"Finally, there is significant and increasing confusion among students regarding ABPM's Certificate of Added Qualification in Podiatric Surgery. The ABPM has promoted this certificate as an alternative pathway to obtaining surgical privileges at hospitals in the future."
Students have no idea what a CAQ is. It does absolutely nothing to circumvent hospital privileging. This is a chicken little, sky is falling, ABFAS talking point that again was fed to students (and Feli). As much as ABPM may be proud of their CAQs, they don't actually do anything. Other than generate revenue and let some podiatrist put another useless line on their CV. There is nothing to be confused about if you just ignore the meaningless certificate.
I've also never seen an ABPM publication that claims that any CAQ is "an alternative pathway to obtaining surgical privileges at hospitals in the future." I know that either Marit or Nicole are reading this so how about you sign up and post that evidence for me? Oh wait, you didn't help write this, so maybe an APMSA BOT member will do so? They have clearly seen the evidence of this happening since they made the claim all by themselves without input from anyone else
I don't believe these people one bit...
But if we assume their letter is true, then they are telling us that the APMSA came up with all of these factually incorrect positions/beliefs/opinions on their own. And said beliefs led to podiatry students across the country losing out on $80,000 that could have gone to educational opportunities, scholarships, etc. That’s not a great look for APMSA…
Look, I'll be the first one to admit how dumb of a profession we are. But our "leadership" must think we are really really dumb. Nice try ABFAS.
P.S. This post will get "reported" to moderators. Again. There is nothing in this post that violates TOS. Everything posted is public information that anyone in the profession can see on the internet, social media, or has sitting in their inbox right now. I would still save this or quote reply while you can. For prosperity, as it will be heavily edited, deleted, or locked soon.
ABFAS released the following letter today:
The APMSA letter was ALL the students idea and they had no input from anyone else. Certainly not their executive director or any ABFAS board members...
About that student letter. It made the following claims:
"Dr. Lee Rodgers, President of ABPM, has posted negative, unprofessional, and misleading commentary on the Student Doctor Network"
@heybrother already outlined this part in a thread that was killed. But we all know this is factually incorrect. To the chagrin of many posters here, he has been the biggest podiatry cheerleader on these boards and led the original charge to get practicing docs to come to these forums and tell prospective students how wonderful the profession is. He's the only "leader" who is actively trying to change the messaging on these forums for prospective students. There are no APMA, ABFAS, CPME, APMSA, COTH, etc. representatives anywhere to be found. It has been literally EVERY OTHER poster on these forums who has said that we are saturated with a lousy job market, and that we should be shutting down nearly half of the residency programs in the country and only graduating around 200 students per year.
"The ABPM has also commenced litigation that has serious ramifications for the profession. It has done so without regard for the autonomy of state associations, and it intends to continue its pursuit of legal action across the country."
Also incorrect. No litigation in the state they are talking about was ever made. Not to mention, there is a 0% chance that a single podiatry student in the entire country has knowledge of state licensure or scope proceedings. Not without being educated by someone who has a stake in the outcome of said licensing rules. For those of you unaware, Oregon required ABFAS RRA cert to perform ankle surgery in the state. The state organization was too chicken to follow through with their request to drop that wording from state licensing rules and so the ABPM made the request to the state Medical Board. The real physicians in the state of Oregon and other members of the Medical Board agreed that the language should be dropped, as no other healthcare provider in the state is required to have any particular board certification in order to obtain a license. In fact, allowing ABFAS to dictate who can do what in the state of Oregon actually takes autonomy away from the state and puts it into the hands of a 3rd party organization that the state has no authority over. Again, the students have no idea what they are talking about but there is one organization with a particularly vested interest in keeping the status quo (hint: its ABFAS).
Another aside, in regards to this particular ruling, here is a quote directly from the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery: "A valid medical license is required to be Board Certified, but certification is not necessary for licensure." Someone should tell ABFAS that the real foot and ankle surgeon's specialty board would disagree with their position in the case of Oregon's Podiatry licensing.
"Finally, there is significant and increasing confusion among students regarding ABPM's Certificate of Added Qualification in Podiatric Surgery. The ABPM has promoted this certificate as an alternative pathway to obtaining surgical privileges at hospitals in the future."
Students have no idea what a CAQ is. It does absolutely nothing to circumvent hospital privileging. This is a chicken little, sky is falling, ABFAS talking point that again was fed to students (and Feli). As much as ABPM may be proud of their CAQs, they don't actually do anything. Other than generate revenue and let some podiatrist put another useless line on their CV. There is nothing to be confused about if you just ignore the meaningless certificate.
I've also never seen an ABPM publication that claims that any CAQ is "an alternative pathway to obtaining surgical privileges at hospitals in the future." I know that either Marit or Nicole are reading this so how about you sign up and post that evidence for me? Oh wait, you didn't help write this, so maybe an APMSA BOT member will do so? They have clearly seen the evidence of this happening since they made the claim all by themselves without input from anyone else
I don't believe these people one bit...
But if we assume their letter is true, then they are telling us that the APMSA came up with all of these factually incorrect positions/beliefs/opinions on their own. And said beliefs led to podiatry students across the country losing out on $80,000 that could have gone to educational opportunities, scholarships, etc. That’s not a great look for APMSA…
Look, I'll be the first one to admit how dumb of a profession we are. But our "leadership" must think we are really really dumb. Nice try ABFAS.
P.S. This post will get "reported" to moderators. Again. There is nothing in this post that violates TOS. Everything posted is public information that anyone in the profession can see on the internet, social media, or has sitting in their inbox right now. I would still save this or quote reply while you can. For prosperity, as it will be heavily edited, deleted, or locked soon.
Last edited: