Hey all. Thanks for the concise and timely responses. Ah, it's just so hard to choose with all of them but RIC, Spaulding, Baylor, UPMC, and Emory were easier to leave out of my top 3 because my wife does not really have job opportunities there. I guess between the 3 listed, there really isn't a "bad" choice as they are all top programs. I am not sure how high Stanford is but Dr. Kennedy made it sound like they do extremely well with presentations, fellowships, grants, jobs, boards, etc.
I think, I ultimately want to do spine/sport, but I'm undecided with Peds and biomechanical research still lingering in my mind.
I know Mayo and UW would set me up for that, probably Mayo more so? Stanford like your saying does seem to be on the up and coming with their spine/pain with Dr. Kennedy and Dr. Smuck. Dr. Teraoka was awesome with a great personality! I thought I gelled really well with the faculty and residents at all three. I liked that Stanford and UW residents seemed to do more social activities together, I attribute that partially because of nicer weather and ample destinations. I also like you can moonlight all years ag Mayo and Stanford.
I guess, 5 yrs from now when it comes to prospectus jobs, all three would essentially be equal..?
Thanks once again.
It's hard to say how Stanford will compare in 5 years, but certainly Mayo and UW will open up plenty of doors for jobs. If you want to be in the Bay Area, Stanford may help more to establish ties--I got the impression most stayed local. And like I said, Stanford's name is growing and I think will continue to grow. I think it's one of the few programs you hear people say "is going places" that actually is. They've done a great job of recruiting top medical students from UCSF and other programs, and they've brought in new faculty over the past few years, so it seems like there's a sustained effort to improve the program.
I approached my rank list like you--first I figured out what programs am I not willing to go to (really none--I preferred any PM&R program to not matching!! But certainly there were some I didn't think I'd be that happy at), and what programs are in areas my wife doesn't want to go to. She really didn't want to live in the South, which had two programs I thought were good fits for me (including one of my favorites).
That left me with three top choices--a well-rounded one near my family (important if you're married, thinking about having kids) that seemed like an decent fit for me, one of the "Top 5" programs that seemed like an good fit, and a "above average" program that to me was the best/perfect fit of any program, but far from family.
I ended up ranking them in that order-- the "compromise," the "name," and then the "fit." The day after I submitted my rank list I regretted ranking the name program above the better fit. But it was too late to do anything at that point, and I knew I'd still be quite happy at that program.
In the end, I matched to the "fit" program and I'm quite thankful for it. And to be honest, the odds are if you match at any of your top 3 choices you'll be quite happy and feel like it's the place you were meant to be. Everyone's going to have different opinions on how to rank the three programs you list.
Honestly, as long as no program has any major limitations for you (ie, broad exposure, especially to the things that interest you), then I don't think you could go wrong with any of those three. So make sure you go somewhere that leave all those options open. And if that happens to be all three programs, go to the one you'd be happiest at.