The MCAT was my downfall.
My application was great also, but it was my interview-I was so nervous! Boy did I screw that up. On top of that it was at the end of March.
So, 1. apply early and 2. interview well!
...Problem two: 'Poor' interview skills. To clarify, a rational discussion of how you decided to become a doc is not what ADCOMs want to hear. They want you to jump around like a crazy person, because that makes you a better doc. Yeah.
There's a lot of guesswork/voodoo in applications, and who knows - they may have simply not liked your picture!Rx, I think I am ok in an interview, although I cannot claim that I am great. I need more interview invitees to maximize my chance of being accepted. I cannot figure out why I did not get many interview invitees like other candidates of similiar stat's.
Put in grades wrong....aamc reviewed and denied...I decided it was too late to change, wait another 4-6 weeks and meet deadlines... So I wait another year. At least my school tells me they will write a letter explaining that since everything else is good. In the meantime, I make 42K with benefits.
42K? wow that's impressive. May I ask what is your current job and do you have any certificate of any kind or just have BS in the Biological Sciences?
Kevin
I applied late (late July/early August)
I had a low GPA (3.1 cum, ~3.2 science)
My pre-med committee recommendation was bad (it said "recommends with reservations")
I was rejected to every school but 1, where I interviewed and was wait-listed, but was not taken off the wait list.
I will say that, while pre-med committees may make things easier (show you the application process ropes) you do not need them. Many applicants "go bare" and succeed.Are you "bypassing" the committee letter this time around? I used to think that all adcoms preferred committee letters, but some mentors on SDN have directly stated they don't even like them...
I will say that, while pre-med committees may make things easier (show you the application process ropes) you do not need them. Many applicants "go bare" and succeed.
The one argument for these committee letters, that adcoms know which schools have them and they depend on them and also they are "suspicious" when someone bypasses them, etc., sounds like so much BS to me now...if it were me and I knew my pre-med committee had screwed me, I would not go through them a second time...and I think that anyone who has doubts about their pre-med committee should as you say "go bare" and skip them, sign up for Interfolio and never look back...
i've got a 3.94 overall and 35Q, average EC's, and had 3 interviews-so i was on the right track...
i think my biggest problem was "level" of school i had my sights on-most were mid/top tier (I hate writing with "tiers"....)
along with that, there weren't enough of them (I applied to 11 total and only finished 6 of 10 secondaries offered) and some were in december (3 of the 11)
more schools = more money.... but more money by way of more schools is also yields greater odds...
on a side note, since i can't remember the words she used specifically take this with some caution.... i spoke with my undergrad U's med school admissions director specifically about my application and she mentioned the work/experiences and personal statement being very business-like. while appropriate, she said it was too much events and not enough personal meaning; ie. Job application vs. personal portrait...
I dunno-i'm inclined to listen because where did the last approach get me?
You started off with too few applications and had too high of an attrition rate - you got interview offers on half of the applications you completed. In your place, I would have had 15 interview offers....along with that, there weren't enough of them (I applied to 11 total and only finished 6 of 10 secondaries offered) and some were in december (3 of the 11)...