I must admit that I feel pretty horrible being told how people are ashamed of going to UCLA and how it is "sad" that I got into to Touro. I didn't think that I would be put down like this just for expressing an opinion. I guess I'll attempt to refute your arguments one at a time.
For whitedc5:
To me, your logic makes no sense because you are basically basing a pharmacist's skills off of his undergraduate studies rather than his professional studies.
Since the majority of pharmacy school applicants don't have doctorates of any kind yet, the only thing that pharmacy schools use to assess your future performance is from your performance of undergrad studies. Thus, your undergrad studies is a good indication of how well you can perform in professional school. I'm quite sure pharmacy schools take account of what undergrad school you went to (competitiveness, etc.) when they look at your GPA. Sure, it's fair game when you start matriculating in pharmacy school and everyone has a chance to show how good they are, but for someone who went to a more competitive school, they are more prone to try harder and be more challenged. You can choose to challenge this belief also, but I think its harder to get A's in more competitive schools. Thus, a more competitive atmosphere trains you to become a better pharmacist, at least from an academic point of view. Does this mean all UC Davis students are crappier than UCLA/USC students? No, it doesn't. But is it easier to get a 3.4 at UC Davis versus a 3.4 at USC/UCLA/UC Berkeley (with the same major of course)? I would have to say yes. If you disagree, I would like to know why.
For FutureFarmDee:
the only way u can be a crappy pharmacist is if u take your education for granted and dont take advantage of opportunities. yes, all schools can produce equally good pharmacists. why doesn't it happen? because each student uses their education differently. sbomb you are from ucla, does that make you better than all students from uc davis, ucsb, uc riverside, uc irvine, and all the other schools ranked below ucla? are we crappier undergraduates? my dad went to community college and thats it...is he a crappier person than i am?
Academically, if I had the same major as someone from the other schools you mentioned and the same GPA, I would say yes, I would be stronger academically. If this opinion offends you, then you'd have to enlighten me on what is wrong about it. Does that make me a better person? No, it doesn't. But what does that have to do with being a pharmacist?
again, pharmD is a pharmD and if you pass your exam you can be a pharmacist. usc, ucsf are the best schools with best reputations. but if you go there and just study and pass the exam but have no social interaction skills, then yes you can be a crappy pharmacist and employers will see that. when it comes to graduate schools, rankings don't play a big role. i think i made my argument 5 different ways now from all my posts on this thread.
Right...so you agree that USC and UCSF are among the best schools in the nation. But you just don't like my reason of why they are the best. I have no doubt that there are people from USC and UCSF who will make crappy pharmacists because they have no social interaction skills. But for every one person who lacks social skills at USC/USCF, there is another one at the other California schools that I "bashed". Social interaction skills are tested during interviews for all skills. I know UCSF has a really tough interview. And you have to sell yourself for the USC interview. And same for Touro. I think every student who gets into pharmacy school has good communication (both writing and verbal) skills. That being said, your argument about the small instances where students from USC/USCF are bad at communication are not relevant to my argument. Because I'm talking about averages. On average, I'm going to say everyone who goes to a pharmacy skill can communicate well. The only other determinator is grades, what school you went to, and your extracurriculars (which I assume everyone has).
For panbabylon:
no, the funny (sad) thing is that sbomb got in and is holding the place of our friends who are still waitlisted and really want and deserve this.
So because I think USC is a more competitive/better pharm school than Touro makes me not deserve to go? Your comment was completely inappropriate. So if I don't get into any other schools even though Touro isn't my first choice, then I don't get to go to pharmacy school? I have every right to apply to as many pharmacy schools as I want and select the one I want just like any other applicant.
For madchemist2006:
Wow, it is comment like this that make you a crappy pharmacist and no way can the USC education helps you. I wanted to leave this one alone but it is comment like this that make a fellow bruin feel all crappy. A better GPA does not make a better pharmacist and if you feel that way, I'm guessing that you are either full of it or a hypocrite in order to get pass the application process.
I don't see how my opinion would make me a crappy pharmacist. If a better GPA isn't a good indication of the potential of a future pharmacist, then why is GPA so important in the application process. Sure, it's not everything, but it definitely plays a huge role in admissions. I don't see how my opinion makes me a "hypocrite" or being "full of it". That simply doesn't make any sense.
To everyone in general:
I think many of your comments are beyond argumentative to the point of inappropriateness. Not once did I make personal attacks on people on this forum and not once did I express resentment or anger. Those of you who think I don't deserve to have a spot at Touro, that is totally crossing the line. I've worked just as hard as you have to get here. Calling me a "hypocrite" and "full of it" is plain wrong.
If you want to debate me on this further, then I'm up for it. I want to go to the best pharmacy school and be around the most competitive students so I can maximize my own potential as a pharmacist. Since there is a lot of group work involved in pharmacy school, being around the best and brightest doesn't hurt. I merely threw out an opinion which may be right or wrong and to get some cool-headed feedback. But apparently, I have upset many people and I apologize if my opinion wasn't more tactfully phrased. But I certainly do not deserve these personal attacks.