D
deleted898085
"If we make all the loans funded directly to the institutions and do away with refunds, we can take care of that problem. "There are always ways around that. It's not that hard to come up with deterrents to abusing the system. If we make all the loans funded directly to the institutions and do away with refunds, we can take care of that problem. It is true that the government's involvement in student loans is inherently creating inflated college costs. So why can't we come up with something like say, no institutions being eligible to participate in the federal loan program if their tuition costs are rising faster than the rate of inflation.
I'm sure there are several ideas to brainstorm and come up with fixing the issue. But I agree that an interest rate approach is much better than all out forgiveness, since it still preserves some form of responsibility for the loan. Borrowers will benefit tremendously from a little to no interest rate loan program and greatly reduce the length of time people are saddled with debt.
This is what they're doing right now, isn't it?
My school sends us a budget every year: $60k for tuition, $38k for living cost.
I've received $38k each year, deposited to my checking from school.
I can live with just 20k/year but since the interest rate is low, I take all 38K.
And bc they can't find a job as a pharmacist, they're gonna start all over again with nursing school...
It's better than working minimum wage, $8/h or 16k/yr imo
Last edited by a moderator: