...Most things we do were developed using evidence-based medicine, thus proven to be both safe and efficacious...
While "research" has gone on for generations, I am not sure we can say your statement is accurate. I suspect the all encompassing catch phrase of "evidence based" is a fairly new and common quotation. However, "we" have been doing extensive things without any evidence other then "my attending showed me this once...". I hope the future is about mostly evidence based practice. However, it is not the case at this time for numerous reasons, not the least of which being numerous things can not ethically be "randomized controlled". Another matter is capabalilities....
Just for a rhetorical point, do you know good literature to show/base practice of 5 day/7 day/10 day antibiotics courses? I can say we are doing more research onthat matter. However, originally the course was fairly arbitrary and seemed like a good idea based on anectdotal experience. I suspect the champions of evidence based medicine and practice would cringe at the idea that anectdotal experience equates evidence base....
How about choice of wound dressings? dilute betadine packing, iodoform packing gauze? NS wet to dry? or as posed/asked by a fairly famous surgery program director , "would you use Holy water?".
How much irrigation do you use to irrigate a contaminated abdomen...until it's clear? I know of a paper out there that suggested 29 liters! When was the last time you saw someone do that volume of irrigation? What about antibiotic irrigation.... is that evidence based? Poured irrigation as opposed to pulsatile irrigation....?
How about laparoscopic verse open repair of bilateral inguinal hernias? I have generally seen that the trained laparoscopist does it MIS while the hernia guy that does not practice laparoscopy does it open.... are the patients really getting the best operation based on "evidence"? It is a very common procedure....
Thus, the opinions and claims in this thread have NOT been "evidence based" (consistent with our long medical tradition). I would suggest those that claim
"most things we do were developed using evidence-based medicine, thus proven to be both safe and efficacious..." have not actually seen the evidence... because in many respects
it is very scarce and we practice largely on a oral tradition of anectdotal experience. Step beyond believing what you were taught and actually look it up...
I hope the future is about mostly "evidence based practice". However, it is not the case at this time for numerous reasons...
LS