More confusion for patients.
Could be at a national meeting.According to google, one of the three definitions for associate is: "A person with limited or subordinate membership of an organization." I think what we should do is call all PAs/NPs health care providers and then call physicians, physicians.
I think as physicians we should actually highlight this to make a point about how PAs care more about what they're called than the work they do. This person is acting like someone's life was actually bettered by this.
Also what is a house of delegates? Seems like something on the state level.
Its a clear move to distance themselves from physicians so they can chase that independent practice dream that the NPs get to have.
Exactly. In my experience, their titles are often associates.How do Assistant Physicians and unmatched IMGs working in clinical jobs while trying to match react?
I'm just thinking what's stopping us from replacing midlevels with unmatched IMGs. Because i think a lot of countries have this model from earlier discussionsExactly. In my experience, their titles are often associates.
Let's do it. The problem is going to be with licensing them as physicians because currently most need 2 years of residency experience in the US prior to that.I'm just thinking what's stopping us from replacing midlevels with unmatched IMGs. Because i think a lot of countries have this model from earlier discussions
It would open the floodgates for every doctor from Cairo to Manila to come scrambling over here and price both us and the midlevels out, that's what.I'm just thinking what's stopping us from replacing midlevels with unmatched IMGs. Because i think a lot of countries have this model from earlier discussions
Licensing laws are still in place though so hospitals don't have flexibility to replace licensed board certified physiciansIt would open the floodgates for every doctor from Cairo to Manila to come scrambling over here and price both us and the midlevels out, that's what.
It would open the floodgates for every doctor from Cairo to Manila to come scrambling over here and price both us and the midlevels out, that's what.
I think what we should do is call all PAs/NPs health care providers and then call physicians, physicians.
We have nurses with online degrees and no medical knowledge getting free practice authority. Pretty sure actual doctors willing to work for much less than US docs wouldn’t have problems once this became a thing.They wouldn't be able to be board certified, but merely licensed. It's a huge difference. The pay should be between 100-120K based on experience. This would effectively end midlevels.
The supply though! True that at many places the continuity would be difficult to turn down.There is one problem though. Midlevels are useful because they stay longer as opposed to transient nature of unmatched IMGs who will be reapplying in the match
They spent millions of $$$ to come up with "Medical Care Practitioner." Only to go with the name they came up with before spending the money.
A race to the bottom, here we come!
It's rhetorical.They wouldn't be able to be board certified, but merely licensed. It's a huge difference. The pay should be between 100-120K based on experience. This would effectively end midlevels.
That pretty sharply demarcates the Asian continent. I've seen a lot of subtle comments on SDN about non-Western IMGs being inferior in training to UK or Australian medical students. If anyone actually thinks this, can ya'll outline why because I think the notion is absurd.
More confusion for patients.
Another would be specialized care that is lower acuity. Our PAs see warts and acne...they are specialized in that regard and probably know more than I do regarding certain things (which meds and treatments are covered, etc). They actually will periodically bring up the fact that more complex patients are incorrectly being put on their schedule by the schedulers and that it's not supposed to be happening.Like so many things, it is a noisy minority of "Advocates" who push for any changes. I don't believe a significant majority of CRNAs want independent practice as most are smart enough to recognize their limitations. My daughter in law is a PA, and very smart. I asked her to be one of my med students on several occasions and she declined stating she was happy just where she was. I also think we use mid levels incorrectly. I think the Dr should see patients first and the midlevel utilized for follow up. My sister in law had a navicular fracture missed by the PA. Plain films normal, but the Orthopedist would have a higher index of suspicion with continued pain and ordered a ct sooner
As a NZ student in the UK I imagine this would basically start to force a slow transformation of what is favourable criteria for residency selection/matching; basically I would expect the US system to eventually mimic the system in NZ/AUS/UK (idk how many years this would take but it'd be an interesting discussion). I've discussed the 'residency process' in these countries a lot on reddit but basically you can perpetually be stuck in PGYX because of the way our system works in that residencies are competitive within themselves, so not only is getting in competitive but so is advancing to PGYX.They wouldn't be able to be board certified, but merely licensed. It's a huge difference. The pay should be between 100-120K based on experience. This would effectively end midlevels.
That pretty sharply demarcates the Asian continent. I've seen a lot of subtle comments on SDN about non-Western IMGs being inferior in training to UK or Australian medical students. If anyone actually thinks this, can ya'll outline why because I think the notion is absurd.
You can barely see the associate. I had to squint real hard. Seems like the title change was a huge win for them lol. It's quite obvious that the intention of the title change was to be seen as somewhat equal to a physicians, especially to patients who don't know better. The title change is them gearing up for independent practice.Love how PHYSICIAN is huge and in bold. These people’s fragile egos know no bounds. I will still call them physician’s assistants.
You can barely see the associate. I had to squint real hard. Seems like the title change was a huge win for them lol. It's quite obvious that the intention of the title change was to be seen as somewhat equal to a physicians, especially to patients who don't know better. The title change is them gearing up for independent practice.
They literally spent over a million dollars deciding on “medical care practitioner” and then still went with physician associate. It’s so transparent. I don’t know how people fall for this ****. Sometimes I feel like the inmates are running the asylum.
I agree. Even a PA stepped into the comment section and said that it would cause confusion to patients and be a nightmare for HR. Seems like not all PAs are hurt by the term "assistant"
I work at a good-sized teaching hospital. I work with all sorts of “providers” but make it a point to say that I am a physician.
Soon it'll turn out that that C in the "PA-C" stands for "can..."
I'm just thinking what's stopping us from replacing midlevels with unmatched IMGs. Because i think a lot of countries have this model from earlier discussions
I know you mentioned Asia, but if you consider ex-Soviet Bloc countries "non-Western," then the training can be quite different, even in the past decade or so. For example, at the Harvard Medical School of the Czech Republic (Charles University First Faculty), 10-30 medical students are assigned to ONE patient for rotations. During rounds, the attending crams dozens of med students around the patient's bed as the teaching case for the day. That clinical experience is vastly different from the US and objectively inferior.non-Western IMGs being inferior in training to UK or Australian medical students. If anyone actually thinks this, can ya'll outline why because I think the notion is absurd.
The normal ones do say PA. The ones who are fighting for it are probably walking around saying "Physician associate"It makes no sense that physician is in the title anymore. It did when they were the physician ASSISTANT. Couldn't we argue that NPs, MAs, scribes, are also physician associates? lol
Nevertheless, I dont think it really matters... they all use PA like it doesnt stand for anything anyway and patients will either not know it changed, not care, or thought they were physician associates in the first place
@Matthew9Thirtyfive "I went to two years of medical school, you bet your a** that physician title is staying!" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Seems like rocky is saying that his education earned him the right to the title "Physician" and Sara feels she practically went to med school. Oh well
The scary part is that I once asked one of our instructors about differences in course curriculum between our program and the PA program, and the answer I got was almost like they have more respect for PA students and care more about them. The logic was superficially ok - “they’ll be out and practicing right after they’re done. You guys have years to learn that stuff.”
Why is that sellout teaching in med school and contributing to the rot of med education?The scary part is that I once asked one of our instructors about differences in course curriculum between our program and the PA program, and the answer I got was almost like they have more respect for PA students and care more about them. The logic was superficially ok - “they’ll be out and practicing right after they’re done. You guys have years to learn that stuff.”
Why is that sellout teaching in med school and contributing to the rot of med education?
Oh wait i forgot.
Admins. It's always those useless malignant admins, who get full support from several simping med students
Why are they teaching med students and residents? Why not remove them from teaching service? Are med schools really that short staffed that they can't find capable attendings without relying on useless sellouts?It’s not just admins. Plenty of academic physicians love midlevels because they do all the stuff they don’t want to do so they can sit in their offices and collect a paycheck while their army of midlevels mismanage their patients.
Why are they teaching med students and residents? Why not remove them from teaching service? Are med schools really that short staffed that they can't find capable attendings without relying on useless sellouts?
Why is your school so awesomeI have yet to experience any of it at my school’s sites, but I know friends at other schools who have plenty of attendings who are clearly there for the prestige of academics and/or the research opportunities.