Docmike2006 said:
Severe medicare reimbursement cuts are going into effect - and this is only one factor.
Reimbursement cuts -- and an increasing workload, as well as turf wars. Radiology is no longer a cake walk.
Sure there are reimbursement cuts, but which specialty has not experienced this? It happened to pathology 15-20 years ago, it has also happened to the surgeons. Furthermore everyone in trying to get into the imaging game will also take a hit (Neuros, orthos, cardiologists).
Increasing workload - that means you'll continue to be in demand in the forseeable future.
Turf wars - there always have been turfwars, always will be. There is plenty of cardiac disease to go around when CTA of the coronaries goes prime time. As far as IR turf wars go, the newer procedures (which tend to come to IR first) tend to reimburse better than older procedures like vascular stenting (which has already seen a pay cut).
It's still the best field out there IMVBO (In my very biased opinion). Newest tech, diverse pathology, having a pivotal role in diagnosis, and having a role in treatment (with IR). No other field offers the flexibility in locale (you can do telerads from anywhere in the world).
Think about the pertinent negatives: much less paperwork BS, no social work BS, no clinic (unless you do IR). I can't think of any other field I would rather do!