D
deleted947887
Can we guess how many programs went unmatched this year and see who guesses right for a prize?
I'm gonna say 8 programs and 16 spots.
I'm gonna say 8 programs and 16 spots.
Can we guess how many programs went unmatched this year and see who guesses right for a prize?
I'm gonna say 8 programs and 16 spots.
Looks like 26 spots [no guess needed].
Wowza. If this isn't fake news, hopefully it wakes up somebody in leadership.
More like great work SDN?
This is exactly what you guys wanted.
students are listening - good
Can't handle the red pill?More like great work SDN?
This is exactly what you guys wanted.
More like great work SDN?
This is exactly what you guys wanted.
No worries, there will still be spots available in the scramble (or whatever it is called now) for folks who were not competitive enough to match in FM, pathology, or nuclear medicine.
I haven't looked at the spreadsheet because I don't have ready access to the link but I have it from multiple sources that's 26 spots across 19 programs most of which are johnny-come-latelies and by that I mean this year or 2-3 years in existence. Arguably only one or two of any significance among all 19. For those that just opened up shop, they should probably just do the right thing and shut-er-down.
From what perspective is that the right thing? This is a business. Whoever doesn't understand that, is fooling themselves. No chair will pass up the opportunity for free labor-integrity be damned!
Basically @domestique does not know wtf they are talking about.
So is this the canary in the coal mine that Zeitman predicted? It came way sooner than I think anyone would have expected.
Vs the underhype from pretty much everywhere elseoverhyped job concerns (largely from this message board)
I really hope the majority of these programs wise up and DON'T participate in SOAP or else it will be filled by DOs, Foreign and Caribbean graduates
Depends on the scenario... But some of them are weak, clinically and otherwise. Not all, but some and that creates a stigma around them.Whats wrong with that?
Depends on the scenario... But some of them are weak, clinically and otherwise. Not all, but some and that creates a stigma around them.
Why else do people go the DO or IMG route coming from undergrad in the states?
I have confirmed with more senior SDN staff. Public discussion of exactly which programs are on the SOAP list is not permitted on SDN due to NRMP legality issues. Please refrain from naming programs specifically on SDN.
Does that also apply to the spreadsheet?
I'm glad students are listening and seeing the signs. Maybe now the so called leaders in this field will as well...but I doubt it. The reasons for this are 1. Less applicants (smart students who know what's going on), 2. Too many programs (not so smart PDs and Chairman), and 3. Programs that are not top-10 thinking they are top-10 and interviewing top applicants. I really hope the majority of these programs wise up and DON'T participate in SOAP or else it will be filled by DOs, Foreign and Caribbean graduates
We had a couple of medical students at our institution who were strong clinically and with great board scores. They were engaged in research with us but voiced job market concerns and the direction that the field is taking as the main factor that made them decide to pursue IR as an alternative.
We had a couple of medical students at our institution who were strong clinically and with great board scores. They were engaged in research with us but voiced job market concerns and the direction that the field is taking as the main factor that made them decide to pursue IR as an alternative.
What do you call 15% of rad onc not filling?
A good start.
Greedy academic chairs ruined this specialty.
Get the specialty back down to 100 residency grads per year for a few years and let's see where we are.
I have been looking for a new job for almost a year now, willing to move almost anywhere in the country for a good position. Zero interviews. Meanwhile, med oncs are having a party all over my state. They are being hired at double to triple the going rate for rad oncs and being heavily recruited out of fellowship.
Since >10% of all slots went unfilled, can we all finally agree to halt residency expansion? Does it make sense to expand when there are more positions available than US applicants?
No, it will get worse next year. Never try to catch a falling knife is a good piece of advice for medstudents and stock pickers.... and yet the sun still rose this morning. Everyone needs to take a deep breath
No nice discussion on Twitter about RO can happen without bashing SDN... Seems to have occurred a few times on the repliesARRO started a nice discussion on Twitter .
It would be great if this could happen, but again the issue is greed, and residencies will just fill with FMG/DOs. You dont have to be that smart to be a good radiation oncologist (my IQ<100 based on wonderlic) . With all the instituitional policies and protocols, a warm body will suffice, especially in a setting like MDACC where there is a rule for everything.ARRO started a nice discussion on Twitter in which many of our shining leaders are talking about getting folks from ASTRO, ABR, ACGME, SCAROP, and ARRO to do... something. Perhaps, I don’t know, maybe we need fewer residency spots? Where have I heard this before?
It’s really something else to see this discussion take place when many of us have been begging for answers for years, only to be met with “medical students will decide” or “the market will correct itself.” Now that medics students have voted (by choosing other jobs), many of these same people are somehow surprised.
Fascinating.
ARRO started a nice discussion on Twitter in which many of our shining leaders are talking about getting folks from ASTRO, ABR, ACGME, SCAROP, and ARRO to do... something. Perhaps, I don’t know, maybe we need fewer residency spots? Where have I heard this before?
It’s really something else to see this discussion take place when many of us have been begging for answers for years, only to be met with “medical students will decide” or “the market will correct itself.” Now that medics students have voted (by choosing other jobs), many of these same people are somehow surprised.
Fascinating.
What do you call 15% of rad onc not filling?
Get the specialty back down to 100 residency grads per year for a few years and let's see where we are.