- Joined
- Dec 19, 2003
- Messages
- 301
- Reaction score
- 0
I stand corrected!
You're not working at the same hospitals where I am, are you?
Actually this was in a community (nonteaching) hospital, about 50-60 miles from Atlanta....of course, "Atlanta" covers a lot of territory, these days. I worked there for about 7 years.
I no longer work there. I am a traveler in hemo/onco, mostly leukemia and BMT units and the occasional high dose IL2/biologics dedicated unit. Some assignments include Johns Hopkins, Beth Israel Deaconess, HUPenn, Thomas Jefferson, NYP - Cornell, the NIH plus a whole lot of heinous comm hospital med onco units in FL (have to help out Mom for at 13 weeks each year and she lives there). So you might say I see the best and the worst practices.
The bad part is many M/S units will take tele these days, but the staff neither have the experience or education to really handle it adequately. You can pass off the staff on basic tele skills, but that doesn't mean that they know what to do with all of the arrhythmias, and depending on the accuracy of the equipment, really read the tele. What is in the books and what you see on the monitor varies greatly with your dementia patient writhing all over the bed and your DTer ripping off the leads on a regular basis.
Prior to being passed off on tele, I worked a (again, a FL community hospital) that had recently started taking tele patients and had the staff "inserviced" in tele. As a traveler, I did not take teles, but an LPN on another section did. His 78 year old CHFer starting complaining of severe chest pain. She and the covering charge are trying to figure out "the official" rhythm, to notify the MD, as the MD will ask it on the phone. I (who knew very limited tele) look immediately at the admitting strips, and note that as the CP is worsening, that the QRS is widening and flatting, and that the tell tale "rabbit ears" are present on the newer strips. Now there is that point where "common sense" should take over, and someone should stop worrying about the "official reading" and just call and stat the pt to a cardiac unit.
But many admission departments and many MDs will see the indication that a certain M/S floor takes tele, and automatically place Cardiac patients there, without regard to the actual skill level of the personnel nor the ratios involved. There is more to taking care of primary cardiac patients than being able to pass a basic tele test. Though as an onco/hemo nurse, I like to have tele (too many patients on ambisome that need faster lyte replacements than permitted off tele), I also dread as it means that we will invariably get cardiac patients that DO NOT belong on a noncardiac floor.