Decided! Thanks everyone for the perspective.
Last edited:
Thanks for the perspective! I do have long-term goals of working in academics, so some non-profit employers might qualify me for PSLF. I do think the more personal factors all point towards Penn over HMS and Hopkins at this point. My only concern was if there was any real tangible difference in the doors opened by HMS or Hopkins over Penn? I highly doubt this (e.g., look at how well UCSF students do in the match since UCSF is a juggernaut, though UCSF has a bigger name on the west coast and arguably less of a "brand" than Harvard). But people keep mentioning it to me, and I wanted some additional perspective on this.Congrats! Fwiw, I'm in a similar position of choosing between HMS with about 300k more in loans vs a Penn peer school with a full-ride (WashU) that's a bit closer to home. The biggest chunk of advice I've gotten has been to take the money and run, unless you absolutely hate the location. The fact that Penn is also in your preferred location and right next to your support system makes the choice clear, imo. I'm also very big into health policy and a piece of advice I've gotten is that you can just take a research year and get your MPP/MPH/MS at Kennedy or Bloomberg.
Also just from personal observation (so take it with a grain of salt), but the bulk of people I've met who turned down full-rides from Washu/Penn for HMS at full loans either have a ton of family monetary support, or goals in academic medicine where PSLF would make more sense.
0 difference. Penn is also a juggernaut in medicine. You will be in the exact same position at Hopkins, Harvard, or Penn. Even if you pursue a purely academic career there will be the exact same doors open no matter which of those schools you go to. Definitely take Penn and start a career off debt free.Thanks for the perspective! I do have long-term goals of working in academics, so some non-profit employers might qualify me for PSLF. I do think the more personal factors all point towards Penn over HMS and Hopkins at this point. My only concern was if there was any real tangible difference in the doors opened by HMS or Hopkins over Penn? I highly doubt this (e.g., look at how well UCSF students do in the match since UCSF is a juggernaut, though UCSF has a bigger name on the west coast and arguably less of a "brand" than Harvard). But people keep mentioning it to me, and I wanted some additional perspective on this.
Tbh parsing apart any differences in academic medicine outcomes at this level is a bit outside my area of expertise because I want to stay as far away from research/academic med long-term as possible lmao. But my impression is that any marginal differences between these schools will come down to your own ability to do research, obtain grants, etc, and not the school itself.
If your long-term dream is to do residency/fellowship/attending at an HMS affiliate specifically, as opposed to any other peer institution in the country, then you may get a slight boost coming from HMS due to home program bias. However, that's really splitting hairs and, at least for me, definitely not worth any difference in debt.
Also, if you're ok with sharing and just to help my own decision lol, but what were the other schools on your list that you narrowed down?
Thanks for the perspective! I do have long-term goals of working in academics, so some non-profit employers might qualify me for PSLF. I do think the more personal factors all point towards Penn over HMS and Hopkins at this point. My only concern was if there was any real tangible difference in the doors opened by HMS or Hopkins over Penn? I highly doubt this (e.g., look at how well UCSF students do in the match since UCSF is a juggernaut, though UCSF has a bigger name on the west coast and arguably less of a "brand" than Harvard). But people keep mentioning it to me, and I wanted some additional perspective on this.