Hi! Thanks for answering questions for us!
1. What do you think about the new MSPE changes/format?
2. It would seem to me that most everyone would sound like rockstars on the MSPE, as a school wants students to match and in some instances, may edit out negative comments. How often do you come across evaluations that are lukewarm/downright awful? Do you feel like you have to "read between the lines" often?
3. How do you handle students at a true P/F school with no internal rankings?
4. How have you/your program changed the way you evaluate applicants over the years and do you feel like the change was generally beneficial?
5. Does the resident selection committee generally tend to agree as to who is ranked 1,2, 3rd, etc etc? How do you deal with disagreements?
6. What's a general "day in the life" of a PD during interview season?
Eh, I'll take a crack. Again not a program coordinator but was a recruitment chief last year.
1&2) To be completely honest, MSPEs tend to be very, very generic and you are very right in that they typically edit out the negative and focus on the positive. We look through them very briefly (you'd be surprised at how long they are, usually > 10 pages including all the graphs and what not - that's hard to review with > 1000 applicants), but honestly the rest of the application (scores, letters, grades) are more important and individualized. If they've changed it, good.
3) Thankfully true P/F is very rare (for now). We haven't run into it much at my program, but many have P/F for years 1,2 and 4. We typically gloss over years 1 and 2 anyways, 3 is where the meat is. But, hypothetically, if it was all really P/F (and no high pass or high honors) then USMLEs and letters take higher importance.
4) We've changed a lot over the past couple of years, we have a new PD who brought some new ideas in. We have much more resident and new/young faculty participation now. The best thing they've done, in my opinion, is "blind" those interviewing (both residents and faculty) to scores and statistics of applicants - the only thing we see are basic information about the individual, their personal statement and LORs. It really helps us concentrate on the applicant rather than numbers.
5) We interview over 200 people for our residency over many different interview days so we don't all sit down and do the final ranking. For our program, we sit down at the end of each day and assign scores to each applicant and give our feedback. Sometimes there is lots of agreement and sometimes total opposite impressions. *Caveat: NEVER tell an interviewer you are applying to X program as a backup in case you don't match in Y specialty or Z city, an applicant told me that (and no one else) once which landed them off the rank list*
- In our programs the PD with the assistant PDs sit down and make the rank list, which takes about 3-4 hours.
6) I'm not a PD, but applicants need to remember that PDs have full clinical obligations to deal with. Many are division chiefs, vice-chairs or hold other leadership roles within the department that require attention. All (by definition) are active clinicians and do not have all day and night to sit and brood over applications. Oh, don't forget that most have family and home lives as well.
- So basically, they might get a half day a week off from clinical responsibilities to interact with applicants and say hello, maybe reduced schedule during peak interview season (but possibly not!).
Hope this helps.