Not sure what the case has to do with the anesthesia outcomes. This was not a 70 year old diabetic coming for TKA that would benefit from cardiac workup. This was, by all accounts, a perfectly healthy 3 year old that died because anesthesia couldn’t manage the airway. Sure there is always a “risk with general anesthesia “. That is primarily because there are a lot of shady providers out there, not some inherent risk. The answer to these problems is not to do less cases (and turn away business) it is to be competent.
“Competent” providers don’t agree to work at “dental mills”, doing (often unnecessary) cases with unsecured airways, lack of proper equipment, and (likely) lack of staff (PACU/etc).
Maximizing profits and cutting costs= bad outcomes.
Guess I’ll just leave at this:
I don’t feel the “risk” of dead children, injured children, and the billions in $$$ of cost to taxpayers and parents, is often worth it, so a kid can have nice baby teeth or to line some pedi dentist’s pocket.
The kids that DO need care (1/2-2/3, in my opinion), should be done in a safe environment by providers looking to provide safe care, NOT merely assist in “cutting anesthesia expenditures”.
Our job is to provide safe care. Sometimes the “safe” thing, as a profession, is NOT to simply provide a “service” for every provider that asks for it, without question.
It’s easy to say “I’d never lose an airway!”. We have a LOT more help/equipment in a surgery center/hospital, than this guy had. Not defending him. HE agreed to take a bad job, in a bad facility, and likely made bad clinical decisions.
LOTS of bad decisions, here, with a failure to “secure the airway”, being the last (but not only).
Take care.