This!This is what happens when in anticipation of provider status the schools decided to teach digital recital exam/prostate exam instead of pharmacology and therapeutics.
Wow… thank you for posting.
Either the new grads suck or the test has gotten Hella harder…
Because CAPhA under Johnson and CSHP under Strom Jr., two of the very few actual advocacy organizations for pharmacy though local in scope, have always opposed low standards due to pharmacy's trust and visibility (with the side effect of a restraint of trade). There was an argument at the NABP level to raise standards in the late 90s, we know how that went.I am rather surprised that the schools have not gotten together and demand that the BOP make the CPJE easier like how they got the BOP to get rid of 1,500 intern hours because “it was causing their students unnecessary stress due lack of intern sites”. Obviously the record number of pharmacy schools wasn’t a factor.
This one would argue the technicality that the "best of the best" is dependent on the academic gene pool. This one would put forward that No Child Left Behind found its way into professional education. When confronted with the possibility of using the absolute crap pharmacy AI available today, this one prefers treatment by algorithm over these "humans"(?). This one believes that bleach would help improve that gene pool.This!
Schools are teaching DVT ultrasound doppler, otoscope, and a host of other crap outside out domain. Yeah we could get provider status and do some of these things but this is out on the fringe.
Back to the OP, does anybody really believe applicants/students have a better background than at least 15 years ago? I don't and the numbers prove it all across the nation not just CA. That's why I love debating the academic elite and clinical preceptor that they are educating the best of the best.
I guess 66k annually in tuition and fees at USC (and likely another 20-30k annually for cost of living) can only guarantee a 71% pass rate.
I can not agree with you more on this…This is what happens when in anticipation of provider status the schools decided to teach digital recital exam/prostate exam instead of pharmacology and therapeutics.
Jesus you can buy a house for that much. Why would anyone this much for pharmacy school?
At that point, the tuition is irrelevant. The essential question becomes, “Would you accept a voluntary extra 10% tax on your income x 20 years in exchange for a PharmD and a job that pays $175k-$225k/yr?”
If I’m a college grad making $50k/yr at some entry level bio tech job with a realistic income cap of maybe $75-$80k, that answer is a no-brainer.
I can’t think of many in SoCal, maybe some Kaiser folks with OT, truly minority. More exception than the rule…How many new grads can get 175-225k?
Where are new grads getting 175k-225k? LolAt that point, the tuition is irrelevant. The essential question becomes, “Would you accept a voluntary extra 10% tax on your income x 20 years in exchange for a PharmD and a job that pays $175k-$225k/yr?”
If I’m a college grad making $50k/yr at some entry level bio tech job with a realistic income cap of maybe $75-$80k, that answer is a no-brainer.
0 lol. They’re lucky to get 80-90k.How many new grads can get 175-225k?
There's only so many of those unicorn type positions available. I'm sure many USC grads end up at CVS with insane debt.
I am rather surprised that the schools have not gotten together and demand that the BOP make the CPJE easier like how they got the BOP to get rid of 1,500 intern hours because “it was causing their students unnecessary stress due lack of intern sites”. Obviously the record number of pharmacy schools wasn’t a factor.
Yep. Goodman and Gilman has been replaced by RxPrep and HighYieldMy gut says these sub-50% schools are going to spend like crazy on test prep and dedicate an inordinate amount of time teaching to the test…also useless.
My gut says these sub-50% schools are going to spend like crazy on test prep and dedicate an inordinate amount of time teaching to the test…also useless.
Nah they don't care what happens to the students after they graduate. They have an endless amount of tuition coming in every year.
This is University of California wide, not specific to UCSF: Undergraduate degrees prepare you for grad school and graduate/professional school prepares you for post grad residency/fellowship/research.Interestingly enough, despite UCSF being often mentioned as one of the top schools in the nation, they never produce high passing rates. I wonder why, if anyone has perspective on that, please share….
I would hope that the low scores would discourage students from attending some of these schools. Also, discourage pharmacists from agreeing to precept these underprepared students…But that’s wishful thinking.
Interestingly enough, despite UCSF being often mentioned as one of the top schools in the nation, they never produce high passing rates. I wonder why, if anyone has perspective on that, please share….
Again, I want to point out how awful Chapman did.
Nah they don't care what happens to the students after they graduate. They have an endless amount of tuition coming in every year.
Interestingly enough, despite UCSF being often mentioned as one of the top schools in the nation, they never produce high passing rates. I wonder why, if anyone has perspective on that, please share….
It’s just straight embarrassing.
80k-120k is a more realistic pay band for new pharmDs with limited room for income growth. I've made essentially the same amount since 2010 in real dollars and noticeably less with inflation.At that point, the tuition is irrelevant. The essential question becomes, “Would you accept a voluntary extra 10% tax on your income x 20 years in exchange for a PharmD and a job that pays $175k-$225k/yr?”
If I’m a college grad making $50k/yr at some entry level bio tech job with a realistic income cap of maybe $75-$80k, that answer is a no-brainer.
My gut says these sub-50% schools are going to spend like crazy on test prep and dedicate an inordinate amount of time teaching to the test…also useless.
80k-120k is a more realistic pay band for new pharmDs with limited room for income growth. I've made essentially the same amount since 2010 in real dollars and noticeably less with inflation.
Someone with the entry level bio tech job can earn an MBA or another degree on the company's dime and can eventually reach that 175k-225k figure as well
I've had 4th years reference RxPrep on their presentations...
You're the exception here. My initial salary was ~$84k (based on 30 hours/week though) and the highest paid tech that I know of was at ~$22/hr with most being ~$18 or under. From what I'm told, hospital techs do make significantly more.Region and practice area?
$80k is less than what my seasoned techs make.
Is employer paid MBA for a lowly bioprocess tech still a thing?
You're the exception here. My initial salary was ~$84k (based on 30 hours/week though) and the highest paid tech that I know of was at ~$22/hr with most being ~$18 or under. From what I'm told, hospital techs do make significantly more.
You're the exception here. My initial salary was ~$84k (based on 30 hours/week though) and the highest paid tech that I know of was at ~$22/hr with most being ~$18 or under. From what I'm told, hospital techs do make significantly more.
That’s about spot on, i’d say even above 100 is a stretch for new grads (assuming they can get jobs). It’s the new typical salary if you look at some of the extensive salary spreadsheets (45-50/hr along with 28 to 32 hours and decreasing in some places). It equates to about 75-80k. If you account for different markets it would be the same due to COL. Some new grad was bragging about 55/hr in NY, which is realiatically like 40 anywhere else.Region and practice area?
$80k is less than what my seasoned techs make.
Is employer paid MBA for a lowly bioprocess tech still a thing?
That’s about spot on, i’d say even above 100 is a stretch for new grads (assuming they can get jobs). It’s the new typical salary if you look at some of the extensive salary spreadsheets (45-50/hr along with 28 to 32 hours and decreasing in some places). It equates to about 75-80k. If you account for different markets it would be the same due to COL. Some new grad was bragging about 55/hr in NY, which is realiatically like 40 anywhere else.
Damn and they are charging graduates for something that they should have learned in the first place.Prospective Marshall B Ketchum student- this is how confident your school is after you graduate: Pharmacy Licensure Exam Requalification Program | Marshall B. Ketchum University
Relatively inexpensive city in NYS but like others have said, that's more or less the going rate across most of the country.Region?
$17/hr is minimum wage here (municipal, the state is still $15/hr before anyone else goes keyboard warrior on me). $22/hr was my resident pay like, 10 years ago, for comparison.
The highest paid tech that I personally know of is like at $48/hr, not at my facility, though.
symptoms of hypertension? are not that common and kinda non-descript.I still remember a fourth-year student from one of these newer schools who couldn't tell me what the symptoms of hypertension were. Needless to say, maybe 50% of their students would fail our APPEs and the school conveniently didn't renew our site contract...
signs/symptoms, sequela... couldn't list classes of anti-hypertensives.symptoms of hypertension? are not that common and kinda non-descript.
people seem to have short memories but before covid, a lot of retail rphs were having a tough time making the full 40 hours/weekRegion and practice area?
$80k is less than what my seasoned techs make.
Is employer paid MBA for a lowly bioprocess tech still a thing?