Writing sample on emcat site

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

vsl5

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
91
Reaction score
13
Consider this statement:
Education comes not from books but from practical experience.

Write a unified essay in which you perform the following tasks. Explain what you think the above statement means. Describe a specific situation in which books might educate students better than practical experience. Discuss what you think determines when practical experience provides a better education than books do.


Wtf. is it me or did the example they give for the best essay (6 points) not mention the criteria for determining when practical experience provides a better education than books. The 2 and 4 point essays both address all the tasks given, but the 6 point one does not discuss how to decide which is better in which situations and yet it is the "best essay".

Members don't see this ad.
 
Can you give a link? I can't find it the essay.
Its on emcat, wont let me link it, but I will copy and paste it.

Essay #3: Education/Practical Experience
There is a basic philosophical tension between theory and practice, basic and applied science, learning and doing, head and hand. Not surprisingly, professors hold books in high esteem. But students are often frustrated by the abstract, seemingly impractical nature of traditional instruction through textbooks and assigned readings. Students hunger for real experiences that teach practical skills and demonstrate clear links between classroom work and practical application.

Tomorrow's leaders and professionals need to work with the tools of their trades, to develop the crucial personal qualities-interpersonal skills, moral judgment, decision making under pressure-that are required for success in real world situations. In fields as diverse as construction and medicine, one thing is certain: experience counts. No matter how many blueprints or books on architecture an aspiring carpenter reads, there is no substitute for working on a construction crew. The same is true for the aspiring physician. An effective bedside manner is learned next to the patient's bed, not in a study carrel. Doctors must read case histories and study theories of treatment, but doctors also need to see patients, listen to them explain their symptoms, and see the outcome of various therapies. Doctors can't just read about how to perform surgery; they need to practice their artistry with a scalpel in hand.

Despite the immense value of practical experience, it must also be acknowledged that books provide the basics. Certain fundamentals are required in any course of study, and books are an appropriate starting point. For instance, in preparation for a medical career, one must be familiar and comfortable with many facts of science. Without a thorough understanding of biochemistry and anatomy, one can hardly be expected to learn much through practical experience. In this case, the professors are right to stress the importance of books. Mastering the content of a subject is a vital first step.

Beyond content, books also educate by teaching students how to think, not just what to know. Often books are the stimulus for creative processes, and they are also a medium for reflection on past experiences. Ethical and moral dilemmas are explored in literature, for example, and the perceptive student who ponders these questions will be better prepared to face them in practical situations. Furthermore, medical students, as well as trained physicians, will find it valuable to read of new discoveries, theories, and the outcome of various studies in the hundreds of books published each year in the medical field.

Reading and doing, head and hand, these seemingly polar opposite approaches to learning, are actually complementary. What we learn from books prepares us for applying that knowledge in real life situations. Similarly, our experiences "on the job" may send us back to books for deeper study or thoughtful contemplation.


SCORE POINT: 6

ANNOTATIONS:

This paper skillfully combines an abstract idea ("There is a basic philosophical tension between theory and practice") with concrete examples (the practice of medicine and the study of science) to create a thoughtful discussion about the nature of learning and its application to various fields. The essay is unified, focused, and substantially developed. The writer demonstrates a facility with language; the diction and syntax are extremely effective in conveying the writer's ideas.

The writer continually advances the argument, building each new paragraph on the ideas and examples of the previous paragraph. The next-to-last paragraph advances a new idea (that "books also educate by teaching students how to think") but connects that notion logically to the preceding argument and the writer's final thoughts (how the "seemingly polar opposite approaches to learning are actually complementary").
 
Members don't see this ad :)
The entire 2nd paragraph. You might've missed it since they answered the 2nd and 3rd criteria in reverse order.
 
The entire 2nd paragraph. You might've missed it since they answered the 2nd and 3rd criteria in reverse order.
Correct me if im wrong but the second paragraph simply states what a construction worker must do and what it provides, but does not explicitly state what parameters should be considered for when practical experience prevails over books. They simply give examples like experience is better when learning bedside manner.
 
Tomorrow's leaders and professionals need to work with the tools of their trades, to develop the crucial personal qualities-interpersonal skills, moral judgment, decision making under pressure-that are required for success in real world situations. In fields as diverse as construction and medicine, one thing is certain: experience counts. No matter how many blueprints or books on architecture an aspiring carpenter reads, there is no substitute for working on a construction crew. The same is true for the aspiring physician. An effective bedside manner is learned next to the patient's bed, not in a study carrel. Doctors must read case histories and study theories of treatment, but doctors also need to see patients, listen to them explain their symptoms, and see the outcome of various therapies. Doctors can't just read about how to perform surgery; they need to practice their artistry with a scalpel in hand.

Correct me if im wrong but the second paragraph simply states what a construction worker must do and what it provides, but does not explicitly state what parameters should be considered for when practical experience prevails over books. They simply give examples like experience is better when learning bedside manner.

The "parameters" are implied in the examples they give of careers in construction and medicine.
 
thanks. So on the writing section, wouldn't it be better to explicitly state that books are better when you need a large knowledge base for the task (eg. surgery)?
 
Top