- Joined
- Mar 17, 2005
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 0
I was previously very interested in the more "lifestyle" surgical fields, but have become enamored with general surgery lately. However, I worked my tail off through med school to be competitive for those fields, and am finding it hard to turn to a "lesser" field -- I put that in quotes because that's what the general perception is and that's why I'm posting here. Every time I told someone I'm interested in surgery, the reaction is "ew, why?! what kind?" Then when I responded "urology, plastics, or ortho" (back when I thought plastics was a lifestyle field), people always said "oh, ortho, that's a good one."
After my surgery rotation, however, it seemed like the general surgeons were still the bad-ass gunslingers in the hospital. Sure the ortho and uro guys were living nice cush lives and always relaxed, but when the feces hit the fan, you send in the marines (or the samurai?).
I'm sure this forum's a little biased toward GS as it is ... but I'm curious what your most honest perspective on this is. Why does GS get such a bad rap? The general surgeons seem to be the best trained -- they have to deal with both medical and surgical issues, and typically issues that could cause significant bodily harm or death. They seem to spend the most time with patients, of all the surgeons (and some of the IM guys). They seem to do the biggest variety of procedures (at least as residents, when you do a little of everything -- pedi, vascular, plastics, etc).
Lastly, it seems that ortho doesn't have the best lifestyle either. Unless you're doing just joints, in which case it's a easy life with great money, you're probably doing a good deal of trauma.
What do you forsee in the future of GS? Will GS get fewer and fewer interesting cases, as they get edged out by specialists? What are the procedures that we will likely hold onto?
Thanks,
b
After my surgery rotation, however, it seemed like the general surgeons were still the bad-ass gunslingers in the hospital. Sure the ortho and uro guys were living nice cush lives and always relaxed, but when the feces hit the fan, you send in the marines (or the samurai?).
I'm sure this forum's a little biased toward GS as it is ... but I'm curious what your most honest perspective on this is. Why does GS get such a bad rap? The general surgeons seem to be the best trained -- they have to deal with both medical and surgical issues, and typically issues that could cause significant bodily harm or death. They seem to spend the most time with patients, of all the surgeons (and some of the IM guys). They seem to do the biggest variety of procedures (at least as residents, when you do a little of everything -- pedi, vascular, plastics, etc).
Lastly, it seems that ortho doesn't have the best lifestyle either. Unless you're doing just joints, in which case it's a easy life with great money, you're probably doing a good deal of trauma.
What do you forsee in the future of GS? Will GS get fewer and fewer interesting cases, as they get edged out by specialists? What are the procedures that we will likely hold onto?
Thanks,
b