- Joined
- Dec 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
and how did you explain it??? Mine is a C- in biochem - blahhahhhhhhhhh!!!
How are the +/- determined?
I've never been clear on how the numerical GPA (2.5, 2.7, 3.0, etc) compares to a letter grade.
Is there an official system?
C+ is Physics II; prof knew there was cheating going on and chose to turn a blind eye, so the grades were (35 being the highest on a test): 35,34,35... then the natural break was a 19. but you know there are no excuses, so Physics just isn't my strong point
It has always bothered me that there is no A+ at my school. I don't think it's fair that somebody with a 93% gets the same gpa as some with a 100%+ (for example in some of my psychology classes where above a 100% is actually feasible). If there is an A-, I think there should be an A+. But that's just my opinion...
The other issue is it just fosters more competitiveness and in many places to a unhealthy level. Its very doable for those individuals who strive to be the top of their class to obtain a 93, but to be shooting for a 98 is on a whole other level.
I'm not sure about "official" but at my school it goes like this:
A = 4.0
A- = 3.67
B+ = 3.33
B = 3.0
B- = 2.67
C+ = 2.33
etc.
It has always bothered me that there is no A+ at my school. I don't think it's fair that somebody with a 93% gets the same gpa as some with a 100%+ (for example in some of my psychology classes where above a 100% is actually feasible). If there is an A-, I think there should be an A+. But that's just my opinion...
IMHO, the competitiveness is already at an unhealthy level. As a student in the largest and most competitive university in my state -- it's a little scary to see how intense people get here.
For example, in my chemistry, biology and biochem classes, people are just plain mean. Ask someone for help, they'll barely answer you, tell you to look it up yourself -- or sometimes they'll tell you the wrong answer on purpose. Not everyone is like that, but I've seen it several times.
Very few people help eachother out, though there are some study groups here and there. But even in study groups, I've heard of people withholding resources from their study buddies.
I find it really depressing - we end up hoping that others do poorly so we can excel - instead of learning together. I know it selects for the academic best of the best, but I have my doubts that it makes for happy, healthy, and well rounded people.
D- in second semester Physical Chemistry. Woo! Honk if you passed P-Chem!
IMHO, the competitiveness is already at an unhealthy level. As a student in the largest and most competitive university in my state -- it's a little scary to see how intense people get here.
For example, in my chemistry, biology and biochem classes, people are just plain mean. Ask someone for help, they'll barely answer you, tell you to look it up yourself -- or sometimes they'll tell you the wrong answer on purpose. Not everyone is like that, but I've seen it several times.
Very few people help eachother out, though there are some study groups here and there. But even in study groups, I've heard of people withholding resources from their study buddies.
I find it really depressing - we end up hoping that others do poorly so we can excel - instead of learning together. I know it selects for the academic best of the best, but I have my doubts that it makes for happy, healthy, and well rounded people.
D- in second semester Physical Chemistry. Woo! Honk if you passed P-Chem!.
<honking> Got a C in that one
i got a C in freshman english.
as long as clients don't ask for a 5-7 page paper on my findings and diagnoses i should be ok
I thought my B- in BioChem would be my lowest until the C+ in Organometallic Chemistry... I didn't even need the damn class, I just needed A 400+ Chem class and that's the only one that fit into my schedule. I am still angry that I didn't think ahead regarding scheduling one in a semester or two earlier.
I would just like to respond by saying... whhhyyy? The advanced chem electives at my school are "synthetic organic chemistry" or "spectroscopy" or "proteins in 3d", all of which I would happily take before organometallic chemistry!
C- in chemical engineering control systems bleccccch
is that like process control??? if so, I loved that class (but we had an awesome teacher for that one). and I found it pretty useful in physiology!
ok back to OP, my lowest grade was a C in Organic Chemistry I. I followed that with an A in Organic Chemistry II though and it was never brought up.
B.
Ya'll that have the + and - system are lucky. My college does A, B, C, D, F. (4.0 - 0.0 respectively). So an 89.4 is the same thing as an 80.
I got an 89.3 in Microbiology, which translates into a B. Soooo close to making an A, and it was a five hour class.
I'm applying this coming application cycle, c/o 2013 hopefully!
That makes me feel old!
And every class where you got an 89.5 and they rounded up became and A instead of an A- and the same with your 79.5's being B's instead of B-'s....
Yup, and both the classes I got C's in were 79.4999's that the professors just didn't round up because they were evil evil men. Or maybe they were 69.5's that got rounded up. A lack of grade modifiers can both help or hurt but at the end of the day it pretty much averages it out.
Think of it this way, if you got a 91 in all your classes you would have straight A's and a 4.0 GPA. If you had grade modifiers then you would have straight A-'s and a 3.7 GPA.
i'm so sorry.We have grade modifiers at my school and I am one of those people that it has hurt. I have gotten one B (a flat B, not a B+), no B+'s but a ton of A-'s. All that to say that if we didn't have modifiers, my GPA would be about a 3.95 instead of a 3.8.