What factors determine whether to treat with a prophylaxis or SRP in patients with gingival recession?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Apexica

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2023
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I've seen patients that have normal probing depths but they also have gingival recession. Here's an example where the probing depth is normal (3 mm) but there is 3 mm of recession. That corresponds to 6 mm of clinical attachment loss.

CAL-with-normal-probing.png


Referring to this table:

Periodontitis-Stages.jpg

That example would be a Stage 3 if going by clinical attachment loss (6 mm) but a Stage 1 if going by probing depth (3 mm). With our office's software, entering the Stage number automatically determines the treatment plan. A Stage 1 treatment would be prophylaxis and a Stage 3 would be SRP. So how should this situation be classified? Would you go by probing depth or by clinical attachment loss? Can this still be considered a Stage 3 and treatment planned with SRP even if you don't observe much calculus?

Members don't see this ad.
 
No. For there to be periodontitis present there must be at least two non adjacent sites with probing depths of >3. What you are explaining is gingival recession or periodontal health on a reduced periodontium. That patient gets a prophy (or perio maintenance if they have previously had srp)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
No. For there to be periodontitis present there must be at least two non adjacent sites with probing depths of >3. What you are explaining is gingival recession or periodontal health on a reduced periodontium. That patient gets a prophy (or perio maintenance if they have previously had srp)
I agree on the treatment. For the sake of classification, in that case above are you saying it's not considered periodontitis? Even with the 6 mm of attachment loss and bone loss extending to about halfway down the root? You would still consider that a Stage 1?
 
This is from the 2017 classification:

CAL ≥ 3mm with pocketing ≥ 3mm is
detectable at ≥ 2 teeth but the observed CAL cannot be ascribed
to non-periodontitis related causes such as:

1. Gingival recession of traumatic origin
2. Dental caries extending in the cervical area of the tooth
3. Presence of CAL on the distal aspect of a second molar and
associated with malposition or extraction of a third molar
4. An endodontic lesion draining through the marginal
periodontium
5. The occurrence of a vertical root fracture
 
Top