You certainly could, but you would unintentionally prove my point instead. My point is that anyone with a little knowledge of the literature can find some BS studies to support his/her bias....and then selectively ignore literature that argues against that bias.
In my chosen field, we say that a surgeon uses a the literature much like a drunk uses a lamp post: more for support than illumination.
I believe that discrimination is very prevalent in medicine. However, I don't think that Asian-Americans are getting the worst of it. There is discrimination against foreign doctors with English as a second language, there is discrimination against DOs and IMGs, and there is discrimination against women. Most of us whities are afraid to be openly discriminatory against Asians because we assume you all know karate.
As for grades, I believe that strong students of all races and backgrounds consistently get good evaluations and good grades. My AOA class certainly wasn't full of quarterbacks and homecoming queens.
I've already mentioned in my previous post how I think students cope with disappointment, and I think this coping mechanism is more prevalent than racism and unfair grading.
Anyway, I'm getting too old and boring to get into big SDN arguments. Five or six years ago I would have loved it, but now it seems exhausting. Please don't have hard feelings about me using you to illustrate my points. It's okay to be upset about the subjectivity of third-year grading....but I don't think anyone has suggested a better method so far, and I certainly don't think grades should be based entirely on a multiple-choice test.