RFA of the Superior Cluneal Nerve--Hope for Hordes of New Afflicted

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,576
Reaction score
6,981
#Gamechanger

Pain Ther.

2022 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00385-x. Online ahead of print.

Radiofrequency Ablation of the Superior Cluneal Nerve: A Novel Minimally Invasive Approach Adopting Recent Anatomic and Neurosurgical Data

O Visnjevac 1 2 3, M Pastrak 4, F Ma 2, T Visnjevac 2, A Abd-Elsayed 5

Affiliations expand
PMID: 35430676 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00385-x

Abstract
Objectives/introduction: Superior cluneal neuralgia (SCN) is a distinct cause of lower back and/or leg pain related to pathology of the superior cluneal nerve (SCn). SCN has been termed pseudo-sciatica and is an overlooked differential diagnosis when patients are otherwise presenting with low back and/or radicular pain. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used for denervation of the medial branches of the dorsal root for facet joint syndrome for sacroiliac joint; however, RFA has not been described to ablate the SCn for SCN. Herein, we present a novel interventional minimally invasive approach using RFA of the SCn for SCN in a series of 46 patients.

Methods: Institutional review board approved retrospective chart review was used to collect data for all SCn RFA cases from January 1, 2018, to February 8, 2021. Fluoroscopically guided SCn ablations were performed for patients with a positive "iliac crest point sign," reproductive of their back and leg pain during physical examination. Sensory stimulation was utilized to confirm RF cannula-probe placement adjacent to the SCn, and motor testing was used to confirm no distal motor response prior to monopolar RF ablation with a Halyard RF Generator (100 mm curved 22G 10 mm active tip RF cannulae). Charts were reviewed for time of analgesia follow-up, duration and degree of analgesia, improvements in patients' functional capacity, and changes in medication.

Results: Data were reviewed for 51 patients who underwent Scn RFA, 5 of which were lost to follow-up. The remaining 46 patients consisted of 29 women and 17 men with a mean age of 59.4 years; 78.3% (n = 36) had ongoing relief at a mean of 92.1 days follow-up, ranging from 13 to 308 days, with a mean of 92.3% analgesia (SD 15.0%). At a mean of 111.2 days of follow-up, ranging from 42-201 days, 21.7% (n = 10) of patients reported that their pain had returned and had 95% analgesia during that time period (SD 6.7%); 41.3% (n = 19) reported improved activity/gait, 17.4% reported improved mood (n = 8), and 8.7% reported decreased medication use (n = 4). Five patients had minor complications including bruising (1), 2-3 days of soreness on site (2), myofascial pain (1), and quadratus lumborus muscle spasm relieved with trigger point injection (1).

Conclusions: This is the first report of both technique and outcomes for radiofrequency ablation of superior cluneal neuralgia. This series suggests that RFA of the SCn is a suitable intervention for the treatment of SCN; 21.7% of patients reported a mean of 95% analgesia for a mean duration of 111.2 days, and the remaining 78.3% of patients reported ongoing relief with a mean of 92.3% analgesia at last follow-up (mean 92.1 days). There were no serious adverse events.

Keywords: Low back pain; Radiofrequency ablation; Superior cluneal nerve.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
🤦🏽‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
What about the remaining 5% or those who build tolerance to RFA? Should we stim them?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
#Gamechanger

Pain Ther.

2022 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00385-x. Online ahead of print.

Radiofrequency Ablation of the Superior Cluneal Nerve: A Novel Minimally Invasive Approach Adopting Recent Anatomic and Neurosurgical Data

O Visnjevac 1 2 3, M Pastrak 4, F Ma 2, T Visnjevac 2, A Abd-Elsayed 5

Affiliations expand
PMID: 35430676 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00385-x

Abstract
Objectives/introduction: Superior cluneal neuralgia (SCN) is a distinct cause of lower back and/or leg pain related to pathology of the superior cluneal nerve (SCn). SCN has been termed pseudo-sciatica and is an overlooked differential diagnosis when patients are otherwise presenting with low back and/or radicular pain. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used for denervation of the medial branches of the dorsal root for facet joint syndrome for sacroiliac joint; however, RFA has not been described to ablate the SCn for SCN. Herein, we present a novel interventional minimally invasive approach using RFA of the SCn for SCN in a series of 46 patients.

Methods: Institutional review board approved retrospective chart review was used to collect data for all SCn RFA cases from January 1, 2018, to February 8, 2021. Fluoroscopically guided SCn ablations were performed for patients with a positive "iliac crest point sign," reproductive of their back and leg pain during physical examination. Sensory stimulation was utilized to confirm RF cannula-probe placement adjacent to the SCn, and motor testing was used to confirm no distal motor response prior to monopolar RF ablation with a Halyard RF Generator (100 mm curved 22G 10 mm active tip RF cannulae). Charts were reviewed for time of analgesia follow-up, duration and degree of analgesia, improvements in patients' functional capacity, and changes in medication.

Results: Data were reviewed for 51 patients who underwent Scn RFA, 5 of which were lost to follow-up. The remaining 46 patients consisted of 29 women and 17 men with a mean age of 59.4 years; 78.3% (n = 36) had ongoing relief at a mean of 92.1 days follow-up, ranging from 13 to 308 days, with a mean of 92.3% analgesia (SD 15.0%). At a mean of 111.2 days of follow-up, ranging from 42-201 days, 21.7% (n = 10) of patients reported that their pain had returned and had 95% analgesia during that time period (SD 6.7%); 41.3% (n = 19) reported improved activity/gait, 17.4% reported improved mood (n = 8), and 8.7% reported decreased medication use (n = 4). Five patients had minor complications including bruising (1), 2-3 days of soreness on site (2), myofascial pain (1), and quadratus lumborus muscle spasm relieved with trigger point injection (1).

Conclusions: This is the first report of both technique and outcomes for radiofrequency ablation of superior cluneal neuralgia. This series suggests that RFA of the SCn is a suitable intervention for the treatment of SCN; 21.7% of patients reported a mean of 95% analgesia for a mean duration of 111.2 days, and the remaining 78.3% of patients reported ongoing relief with a mean of 92.3% analgesia at last follow-up (mean 92.1 days). There were no serious adverse events.

Keywords: Low back pain; Radiofrequency ablation; Superior cluneal nerve.

© 2022. The Author(s).
I've always been a little nervous to use high-temp RF to that nerve. I'll do cryoablation though.
 
  • Hmm
Reactions: 1 users
Guess I am just not smart enough or looking hard enough to find this dx. Can’t see it occurring except after bone harvest for fusions. They don’t seem to do that anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Guess I am just not smart enough or looking hard enough to find this dx. Can’t see it occurring except after bone harvest for fusions. They don’t seem to do that anymore.


Aggressive spanking
Traction neuralgia from thoracodorsal disruption during back surgery
Bad posture
Obesity
Chiropractic complication/iatrogenesis

1650423194859.png



1650423127874.png


1650423296167.png



1650423488943.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Is this every SIJ that didn’t respond to iniection?


I’ve got a procedure looking for a nerve to treat. Gonna PNS every Baxter nerve for people with flat feet and planter fasciitis
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
We're experiencing an epidemic of cluneal neuralgia..in hospital patients treated by hospital employed docs
Fixed it for you.. seriously though, how are people getting this auth’d paid for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Retrospective single site.

hopefully someone will produce a blinded randomized study that shows benefit.


yeah, I’m not optimistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Are people really going this nuts over a single 64640?
I doubt anyone is going nuts over an ablation. I'd wager it is the next three potential steps after the RFA they're looking forward to doing.

Like some form of stimulator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
“osseoaponeurotic orafice"

Is this REALLY the anatomic name for the insertion point of the iliolumbar ligament onto the iliac crest?

Seriously, I've always wondered what the name of this point is.

What makes it an orafice?

I do not think they are ablating the cluneal nerve here...they are ablating the iliolumbar ligament insertion point. Which is often tender and painful...
 
  • Hmm
Reactions: 1 user
I’ve made the iliolumbar ligament sprain diagnosis several times. These people have had a spur there though. Hopefully people aren’t getting PNS for that.
 
Top