I can understand the idea behind the business, and the founder probably (and I say again PROBABLY) believes in what she's doing, but in practicality it's ridiculous. She said that it wasn't a fad or status symbol, but if people were really into it for the pet, why don't they volunteer at a shelter? She says in the article how these pets are better off than being in shelters... now this is more than likely true, but shouldn't we be trying to reinforce the idea of responsible pet ownership and population control? If people took care of their animals and got them spayed (or neutered), then there wouldn't be so many shelter animals in the first place.
My friend resuced a kitten from the storm drain two nights ago. It is one of the sweetest kittens I've seen. She was able to find a good home for it, but she called the shelter in her town and they said they had a 24 hr policy. My mouth dropped when I heard that (there is no non-euthanizing shelters over there). Sorry, I digress...
As for the article, I agree with others. This is sending the wrong message to people. Children will be next on the list... This service doesn't teach people about responsibility. It teaches them that they can have their cake and eat it too. When it gets too hard or inconviences them, they can just drop the dog off. She expects me to pay $850 and I don't even get to see the dog? If I wanted the dog for every Saturday for a year I have to pay $2080? I understand she has to board, feed, train, and care for the dogs, but I just gave her almost $3000 in one year! It doesn't cost THAT much for maintenance of dog (unless they get pretty sick).
Ok, sorry, I need to get back to my wonderful review article I'm writing on the evolution of life-history traits in snakes...
Laters...
-Snakegal