- Joined
- Jun 27, 2012
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 1
Just got in to UIC's MPH program in epi! My stats are here if anyone is interested.
I apologize if my response came off as demeaning to the school, and shortly after posting that comment (and before you posted yours), I edited out some of the more disparaging language in an effort to tone the post down after realizing that it might be taken the wrong way by BU students and applicants. I also originally had the disclaimer "at the risk of sounding like a pompous ass," because I was aware that my comment might be taken badly. It is not my intent to demean the dream schools of others. I should have made that clear in the first post, and I apologize for that. I am further editing the comment ensure it is polite.
As someone who went to a completely unranked liberal arts college for undergrad, I am extremely well aware that reputation is a terribly flawed way of looking at a school. I firmly believe that my college provided me with an education on par or better than that at many Ivy League colleges, even if it did not have the same resources. I have personally been insulted in public and in private because my school is unranked, and I know how that feels. Trust me when I say that if I insulted a school, I had no intention of doing so. Sometimes my emotions get the better of me, and it is a flaw I constantly attempt to overcome.
I don't think the quality of education is any worse at BU. Hell, it might even be better than that of the Ivies. I wouldn't have applied to BU if I had thought otherwise. But in my specific department, HPM, after research of the faculty, common practicums, and student interviews, I determined that the program was more locally focused and lacking some of the resources and employment connections of other programs at schools such as Columbia and Harvard. With other programs similar in scope to BU in these areas, I was offered more generous financial aid, and that is why I was confused and frustrated when I was wait listed (not rejected as you asserted). I would have strongly considered attending there if I had received a scholarship. After all, Boston is a hotspot for health care consulting and a great city in general.
I also made a comment regarding 'fit' because this is a professional degree program, not a traditional research degree. That means that fit doesn't matter nearly as much, as students follow a standardized track without a lot of research on the side. Professor connections are by no means necessary to complete the program either. That is why I'm confused as to how someone who wrote in his personal statement the he wanted to 'expand insurance enrollment for the underserved and to help reform health care systems to make them more efficient while preserving high quality of care' would not be a good fit at any health policy program. These are very general goals common amongst 90% of applicants. I had more specific goals alongside these, but I wrote that I am flexible as I am a young applicant.
I hope that this post explained the logic behind my previous one. While I fully admit that I was confused and frustrated by the decision, there was still a lot of legitimate reasoning mixed behind my post. I apologize again for my emotions getting the better for me.
what987-
You're previous post about BU came off a little rude in my opinion. The program is great and I wouldn't disparage it or their admissions in any way. With a lot of these schools, it really comes down to fit. BU has terrific programs in some departments, and others that may not be as strong, but maybe they just felt you were not a fit for your field, not necessarily that you were "overqualified."
I'm sure you were frustrated by the rejection, and the admittedly very very short response time (only giving a few days after snailmail!). I think we all in this thread need to remember that one students safety is another students dream school, and we all have different tastes and flavors for what we want. We are lucky to be in this position to even consider graduate education, let's not allow our comments to indirectly belittle the achievements of others.
Anyone else receive a financial aid package and want to jump off a cliff? What Columbia offered me was ALL loans and still 11,000 short of tuition (30,000+ short of cost of attendance).
Wow. Wasn't expecting that at all, especially because I don't make very much and my parents barely live above the poverty line. Columbia is absolutely not an option for me. Feeling pretty down about the whole cost situation in general. I am hoping BU and/or Yale give me SOMETHING that I could work with.
Anyone else receive a financial aid package and want to jump off a cliff? What Columbia offered me was ALL loans and still 11,000 short of tuition (30,000+ short of cost of attendance).
Wow. Wasn't expecting that at all, especially because I don't make very much and my parents barely live above the poverty line. Columbia is absolutely not an option for me. Feeling pretty down about the whole cost situation in general. I am hoping BU and/or Yale give me SOMETHING that I could work with.
I also came across your original comment (I see it's since been heavily redacted) and couldn't help wondering why you felt it was OK to react like an entitled, whiny brat. It's understandable that you were upset, but there was no need to disparage a program that any of us would be lucky to go to just because you didn't get the acceptance and royal treatment you apparently deserved. Letting your emotions get the better of you is a weak excuse and will never cut it in a real-world setting (i.e., not an anonymous forum). Every applicant here and elsewhere is facing the same (and worse) stressors you are, but seem to be doing so with better attitudes and more maturity. I'm glad someone had to courage to call you out on your behavior -- it appears to have caused you to reflect on what a major faux pas that was. Hopefully you've learned your lesson the easy way.
For the record, I was admitted to BU and will not be attending ($$).
Anyone else receive a financial aid package and want to jump off a cliff? What Columbia offered me was ALL loans and still 11,000 short of tuition (30,000+ short of cost of attendance).
Wow. Wasn't expecting that at all, especially because I don't make very much and my parents barely live above the poverty line. Columbia is absolutely not an option for me. Feeling pretty down about the whole cost situation in general. I am hoping BU and/or Yale give me SOMETHING that I could work with.
I can completely relate! The loans are terrifying..I only have one acceptance so far, with no funding (to MN), but i'm dreading even thinking about the loans and financing. I wish more programs would give need based scholarships. Does anyone know when MN sends out their financial aid packages? Let's cross our fingers and hope we get some surprise funding!
I'm very sorry, gumby. I haven't received my FA package from them yet but I have received similar and understand the frustration (my parents are poverty-level as well). Fingers crossed that something will pull through
I agree with what 987. They edited, and took back what they said...goodness! I think it's time to lay off a bit. These forums are packed with pompous, obnoxious comments, and it's refreshing when someone pulls back, realizes they were out of line, admits, apologizes, and fixes it. We are all stressed, so can we give each other a break? Attacking the OP doesn't make you any better of a person. I choose not to take people's frustrations and attitudes to heart. Anyone who chooses to be so strongly offended by someone on an anonymous message board....well, how open are they leaving them self to being hurt in real life? Anyways, I'm not here to pick on anyone, to each their own. All I'm saying is, can we not act like we're holier than thou and can we cut what987 some slack?
Here is the final roll call. I have already made my decision. Good luck to Everyone!!!
Initial submission to SOPHAS: 10/30/2012. Verified: 11/9/2012
***My academic/professional profile is on the 1st page of the R.A.W. Data Fall 2013 thread.***
UCLA (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Certificate):
10/30, submitted to SOPHAS
11/14, mailed by SOPHAS
11/30, submitted GradApp (online)
12/14, confirmation email/app sent to dept
2/14, admitted (via e-mail/Word Doc attachment)
2/26, offer letter from Graduate Division (via email/web link)
Status: Accepted Offer!
BERKELEY (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Specialty Area):
10/30, submitted to SOPHAS
11/14, mailed by SOPHAS
11/16, submitted Grad App (online)
Status: App Withdrawn
HARVARD (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Interdisciplinary Leadership):
11/17, submitted to SOPHAS
11/21, mailed by SOPHAS
12/4, confirmation email/app sent to dept
3/8, admitted (via email)
Status: Declined Offer
BOSTON U (MPH, Human Rights Focus):
11/30, submitted to SOPHAS
12/5, mailed by SOPHAS
12/11, confirmation email/app sent to dept
1/14, admitted (via email)
3/1, offer letter (via email/PDF) ***There were issues with mailing the offer letter. I finally had to ask for a PDF copy.***
3/4, offer letter (via post mail)
Status: Declined Offer
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL MED/KING'S COLLEGE LONDON (MSc, Global Mental Health):
11/5, submitted online myApp
12/17, admitted (via e-mail)
1/15, offer letter (via email/PDF)
1/22, offer letter (via post mail)
Status: Declined Offer
COLUMBIA (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Certificate):
12/14, submitted to SOPHAS
12/19, mailed by SOPHAS
3/6, admitted (via e-mail/PDF)
Status: Declined Offer
WHY I CHOSE UCLA: At the end of the day, it is about "goodness of fit." No one program is perfect, and UCLA is no exception. However, at UCLA most of the pieces of the puzzle fit my short-term and long-term interests and goals, both professionally and personally. Health policy training is top-notched at Fielding, and more specifically, it is at the forefront of mental health policy analysis and advocacy. (The clinical psychology PhD program at UCLA is also consistently ranked #1.) With my background in clinical psychology, I hope to integrate mental health into a public health degree that is rich in in-depth knowledge and applicable skills. The Center for Health Policy Research contributed a great deal to the Mental Health Services Act in California, which is a model for mental health reform at the federal level. The BRITE Center highlights the ongoing and needed work to address health disparities across demographics. There are 2 or 3 specific faculty with whom I would like to collaborate during graduate studies, as well.
Harvard is an excellent place for health policy training, but it is poor in mental health related policy curriculum. Columbia excels in mental health related policy training, though in my view not as strong as UCLA. Also, as a former graduate student of Columbia, I can attest to the excessive tuition and high cost of living in New York. (I also did my undergrad in NYC. In addition, a close friend is completing her doctoral fellowship at Mailman. She has pointed out that some MPH students "don't look happy.") The ratio of the value of the degree relative to the overall cost of attendance is significantly uneven. Also, Boston U is an excellent school and will offer plentiful networking, as the city is at the forefront of healthcare reform. Whatever the administrative complaints others have noted on these threads (reasonable or otherwise), they do not reflect the strong course offerings and practice-focused curriculum of the program. However, like Columbia the ratio of the overall value of the degree and the overall cost of the program seems uneven. (More personally, I have lived in Boston for two years. I have had enough of the snow and freezing temperatures.) The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/KCL's joint program is a rare opportunity, not least of which is to be part of one of the most prestigious public health school worldwide. (And you know, being in London ain't so bad either!) However, more research into the curriculum, including speaking to current students, highlighted the limited health policy training. As someone completing a postdoctoral psychology fellowship, I am not interested in learning material I have been learning and applying for the better part of the last six years. I want to learn health policy, not mental health. Lastly, I chose UCLA over Berkeley because Berkeley is not UCLA. You cannot go wrong with Berkeley, and my personal choices are more salient in this regard. My family is in Southern California, and I have not been in the area for the better part of the last six years (because of graduate school). I want to be closer to family, I want sun and warm weather (!!!), I want to be in the most diverse county in the U.S., I miss Asian food (REAL Asian food!), I miss family. The choice is clear. (This is simply my opinion, "goodness of fit" as it applies to me. Of course, many will disagree - and should.)
UCLA, LET'S DO THIS. I cannot wait to wear shorts to class!
GOOD LUCK, EVERYONE!
***Like most folks here, I do not expect to stick around these threads once the application cycle is over. However, feel free to private message. I am happy to answer questions and offer not-so-sage advise.***
Here is the final roll call. I have already made my decision. Good luck to Everyone!!!
Initial submission to SOPHAS: 10/30/2012. Verified: 11/9/2012
***My academic/professional profile is on the 1st page of the R.A.W. Data Fall 2013 thread.***
UCLA (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Certificate):
10/30, submitted to SOPHAS
11/14, mailed by SOPHAS
11/30, submitted GradApp (online)
12/14, confirmation email/app sent to dept
2/14, admitted (via e-mail/Word Doc attachment)
2/26, offer letter from Graduate Division (via email/web link)
Status: Accepted Offer!
BERKELEY (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Specialty Area):
10/30, submitted to SOPHAS
11/14, mailed by SOPHAS
11/16, submitted Grad App (online)
Status: App Withdrawn
HARVARD (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Interdisciplinary Leadership):
11/17, submitted to SOPHAS
11/21, mailed by SOPHAS
12/4, confirmation email/app sent to dept
3/8, admitted (via email)
Status: Declined Offer
BOSTON U (MPH, Human Rights Focus):
11/30, submitted to SOPHAS
12/5, mailed by SOPHAS
12/11, confirmation email/app sent to dept
1/14, admitted (via email)
3/1, offer letter (via email/PDF) ***There were issues with mailing the offer letter. I finally had to ask for a PDF copy.***
3/4, offer letter (via post mail)
Status: Declined Offer
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL MED/KING'S COLLEGE LONDON (MSc, Global Mental Health):
11/5, submitted online myApp
12/17, admitted (via e-mail)
1/15, offer letter (via email/PDF)
1/22, offer letter (via post mail)
Status: Declined Offer
COLUMBIA (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Certificate):
12/14, submitted to SOPHAS
12/19, mailed by SOPHAS
3/6, admitted (via e-mail/PDF)
Status: Declined Offer
WHY I CHOSE UCLA: At the end of the day, it is about "goodness of fit." No one program is perfect, and UCLA is no exception. However, at UCLA most of the pieces of the puzzle fit my short-term and long-term interests and goals, both professionally and personally. Health policy training is top-notched at Fielding, and more specifically, it is at the forefront of mental health policy analysis and advocacy. (The clinical psychology PhD program at UCLA is also consistently ranked #1.) With my background in clinical psychology, I hope to integrate mental health into a public health degree that is rich in in-depth knowledge and applicable skills. The Center for Health Policy Research contributed a great deal to the Mental Health Services Act in California, which is a model for mental health reform at the federal level. The BRITE Center highlights the ongoing and needed work to address health disparities across demographics. There are 2 or 3 specific faculty with whom I would like to collaborate during graduate studies, as well.
Harvard is an excellent place for health policy training, but it is poor in mental health related policy curriculum. Columbia excels in mental health related policy training, though in my view not as strong as UCLA. Also, as a former graduate student of Columbia, I can attest to the excessive tuition and high cost of living in New York. (I also did my undergrad in NYC. In addition, a close friend is completing her doctoral fellowship at Mailman. She has pointed out that some MPH students "don't look happy.") The ratio of the value of the degree relative to the overall cost of attendance is significantly uneven. Also, Boston U is an excellent school and will offer plentiful networking, as the city is at the forefront of healthcare reform. Whatever the administrative complaints others have noted on these threads (reasonable or otherwise), they do not reflect the strong course offerings and practice-focused curriculum of the program. However, like Columbia the ratio of the overall value of the degree and the overall cost of the program seems uneven. (More personally, I have lived in Boston for two years. I have had enough of the snow and freezing temperatures.) The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/KCL's joint program is a rare opportunity, not least of which is to be part of one of the most prestigious public health school worldwide. (And you know, being in London ain't so bad either!) However, more research into the curriculum, including speaking to current students, highlighted the limited health policy training. As someone completing a postdoctoral psychology fellowship, I am not interested in learning material I have been learning and applying for the better part of the last six years. I want to learn health policy, not mental health. Lastly, I chose UCLA over Berkeley because Berkeley is not UCLA. You cannot go wrong with Berkeley, and my personal choices are more salient in this regard. My family is in Southern California, and I have not been in the area for the better part of the last six years (because of graduate school). I want to be closer to family, I want sun and warm weather (!!!), I want to be in the most diverse county in the U.S., I miss Asian food (REAL Asian food!), I miss family. The choice is clear. (This is simply my opinion, "goodness of fit" as it applies to me. Of course, many will disagree - and should.)
UCLA, LET'S DO THIS. I cannot wait to wear shorts to class!
GOOD LUCK, EVERYONE!
***Like most folks here, I do not expect to stick around these threads once the application cycle is over. However, feel free to private message. I am happy to answer questions and offer not-so-sage advise.***
Here is the final roll call. I have already made my decision. Good luck to Everyone!!!
Initial submission to SOPHAS: 10/30/2012. Verified: 11/9/2012
***My academic/professional profile is on the 1st page of the R.A.W. Data Fall 2013 thread.***
UCLA (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Certificate):
10/30, submitted to SOPHAS
11/14, mailed by SOPHAS
11/30, submitted GradApp (online)
12/14, confirmation email/app sent to dept
2/14, admitted (via e-mail/Word Doc attachment)
2/26, offer letter from Graduate Division (via email/web link)
Status: Accepted Offer!
BERKELEY (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Specialty Area):
10/30, submitted to SOPHAS
11/14, mailed by SOPHAS
11/16, submitted Grad App (online)
Status: App Withdrawn
HARVARD (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Interdisciplinary Leadership):
11/17, submitted to SOPHAS
11/21, mailed by SOPHAS
12/4, confirmation email/app sent to dept
3/8, admitted (via email)
Status: Declined Offer
BOSTON U (MPH, Human Rights Focus):
11/30, submitted to SOPHAS
12/5, mailed by SOPHAS
12/11, confirmation email/app sent to dept
1/14, admitted (via email)
3/1, offer letter (via email/PDF) ***There were issues with mailing the offer letter. I finally had to ask for a PDF copy.***
3/4, offer letter (via post mail)
Status: Declined Offer
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL MED/KING'S COLLEGE LONDON (MSc, Global Mental Health):
11/5, submitted online myApp
12/17, admitted (via e-mail)
1/15, offer letter (via email/PDF)
1/22, offer letter (via post mail)
Status: Declined Offer
COLUMBIA (MPH, Health Policy Focus & Global Health Certificate):
12/14, submitted to SOPHAS
12/19, mailed by SOPHAS
3/6, admitted (via e-mail/PDF)
Status: Declined Offer
WHY I CHOSE UCLA: At the end of the day, it is about "goodness of fit." No one program is perfect, and UCLA is no exception. However, at UCLA most of the pieces of the puzzle fit my short-term and long-term interests and goals, both professionally and personally. Health policy training is top-notched at Fielding, and more specifically, it is at the forefront of mental health policy analysis and advocacy. (The clinical psychology PhD program at UCLA is also consistently ranked #1.) With my background in clinical psychology, I hope to integrate mental health into a public health degree that is rich in in-depth knowledge and applicable skills. The Center for Health Policy Research contributed a great deal to the Mental Health Services Act in California, which is a model for mental health reform at the federal level. The BRITE Center highlights the ongoing and needed work to address health disparities across demographics. There are 2 or 3 specific faculty with whom I would like to collaborate during graduate studies, as well.
Harvard is an excellent place for health policy training, but it is poor in mental health related policy curriculum. Columbia excels in mental health related policy training, though in my view not as strong as UCLA. Also, as a former graduate student of Columbia, I can attest to the excessive tuition and high cost of living in New York. (I also did my undergrad in NYC. In addition, a close friend is completing her doctoral fellowship at Mailman. She has pointed out that some MPH students "don't look happy.") The ratio of the value of the degree relative to the overall cost of attendance is significantly uneven. Also, Boston U is an excellent school and will offer plentiful networking, as the city is at the forefront of healthcare reform. Whatever the administrative complaints others have noted on these threads (reasonable or otherwise), they do not reflect the strong course offerings and practice-focused curriculum of the program. However, like Columbia the ratio of the overall value of the degree and the overall cost of the program seems uneven. (More personally, I have lived in Boston for two years. I have had enough of the snow and freezing temperatures.) The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/KCL's joint program is a rare opportunity, not least of which is to be part of one of the most prestigious public health school worldwide. (And you know, being in London ain't so bad either!) However, more research into the curriculum, including speaking to current students, highlighted the limited health policy training. As someone completing a postdoctoral psychology fellowship, I am not interested in learning material I have been learning and applying for the better part of the last six years. I want to learn health policy, not mental health. Lastly, I chose UCLA over Berkeley because Berkeley is not UCLA. You cannot go wrong with Berkeley, and my personal choices are more salient in this regard. My family is in Southern California, and I have not been in the area for the better part of the last six years (because of graduate school). I want to be closer to family, I want sun and warm weather (!!!), I want to be in the most diverse county in the U.S., I miss Asian food (REAL Asian food!), I miss family. The choice is clear. (This is simply my opinion, "goodness of fit" as it applies to me. Of course, many will disagree - and should.)
UCLA, LET'S DO THIS. I cannot wait to wear shorts to class!
GOOD LUCK, EVERYONE!
***Like most folks here, I do not expect to stick around these threads once the application cycle is over. However, feel free to private message. I am happy to answer questions and offer not-so-sage advise.***
it must've been quite a hard decision for you. personally if i were in your position i would've screamed and jumped for Harvard. i would suck it up on the bad food and bad weather and the solitary life for the year haha. but again, everyone has their own need. perhaps i'm putting too much emphasis on the prestigious name. and not about the program.. though i hope i can learn health policy from the best people there is
thank you so much for being so helpful in these threads and to me personally. you have given me much help in shaping my application, and you have also given me much knowledge that i would never have learned since i am an international student
in the end, i wish you good luck in your journey. hope you get what you're searching for ^_^
regards
chris
(will be attending HSPH MPH in Healthcare policy and management)
@porkbrunsrule You'll love UCLA. I mean, LA is great, the school is amazing, as are the people there... glad you found a place you like! And yes, the asian foooooooooooooooooooood
I was rejected by Cal via e-mail today. Again, completely expected since I didn't have the work experience, so I'm not even slightly fazed or upset by it.
ADMISSIONS SEASON IS OVER (for me)
Final roll call here:
UGPA: 3.7
Major/Minor: Political Science (3.95), Psychology (4.0)
GRE: 163V, 156Q, 4.5 AWA
No work experience in the specific field of public health. Only experience in socioeconomic development. I'm fresh out of college. This is probably automatically disqualifying me from Berkeley and Harvard, but we'll see.
Applied: Health Policy/Management MPH at the following: Emory, BU, Harvard (80-hour MSC), Columbia, UPitt, Minnesota, UMich, Berkeley, GWU
Interviews: UMich (1/14), UPitt (12/15)
Accepted: UPitt (12/18), GWU (12/21), Emory (1/11), UMinn (1/17), Columbia (2/23)
Rejected: UMich (2/1), Harvard (3/8), Berkeley (3/11)
Waitlisted: BU (3/7, application withdrawn on 3/8 due to better offers from other schools)
It'll be a while before I make a decision, but my decision process so far is as follows:
UPitt - Declining because it is expensive, there's no aid, and the HPM faculty is more limited in connections.
UMinn - Declining because after thinking a lot about it, I can't live in Twin Cities. I hate the ultra-cold and I have no friends or family up there. It's a great and cheap program/city for HPM otherwise.
GWU - The program isn't well ranked, but the school has incredible policy resources and good Beltway connections. Still deciding, since living in DC is expensive when you don't have a DC-paying job.
Emory - Good school reputation, good faculty, good price (due to a special housing arrangement), friends nearby. Still deciding.
Columbia - Ivy reputation, excellent faculty that is extremely well connected on the policy side. Unfortunately, it costs about $10,000 more than the others in tuition and probably doubles my cost of living over the next two years, so I'd be looking at an extra $30,000 :0 for those benefits. I also have no plans on staying in the City afterwards, even though I might stay in the tri-state. Still deciding here.
Anyone still waiting on BU? I'm 90% sure I'm going to Michigan but I'd still like to know all my options.
Which Michigan program did you apply to?
And if you don't mind sharing, when did you do that?
Rejected from Columbia & Yale, but I knew that was a reach.
Anyone else waiting for BU or Drexel? I feel like they're taking forever...
I got my acceptance from Yale HPM on 3/1 by email. I submitted on SOPHAS 1/15, application was mailed on 2/21.Has anyone heard from Yale HPM? I had in my mind that we were supposed to have heard by March 15, but I just checked their website and they said final notifications will be made by May 31. To call or not to call...