- Joined
- Feb 2, 2004
- Messages
- 493
- Reaction score
- 18
Unless your prescribing physician also chairs your state's licensing disciplinary panel, I would do what the board told you to do - under the guidance of an attorney.
I think the issue is not so much overdiagnosing primary care doctors (who I think on the whole are much more likley to underdiagnose and undertreat). And psychiatrists do see people with situational depression as well. The real problem is the DSM itself which as Blade pointed - it's really not that hard to meet the criteria for an episode of major depression. Actually I think a lot of primary care doctors are less likely to code for a mental illness rather than physical symptoms because of the lack of reimbursement of "mental illnesses" They won't get paid for the visit with a psychiatric code but will if they code some physical symptoms.
That's another reason it always pays to talk to your treating physician.
We recently had a grand rounds (in psychiatry) about this. The state licensing boards are accountable to no one, and there's no higher authority to appeal to. The Texas board has been known to require physicians with no more than a diagnosis of MDD (without psychosis or substance abuse) to pee in a cup on a regular basis. Psychiatrists treating other physicians have been brought before the board for not reporting. And if you do disclose and they have a question about your ability to perform, they can require that you submit to an exam by an independent forensic psychiatrist, paid for by you, which runs about $4k. It's a shame the APA isn't pressuring the board to stop this, but the local APA is made up of people who have to get their license renewed every 2 years, and don't want to rock the boat.
Anyway, if I were the OP, I'd consult with a lawyer who has experience dealing with the board in your state, and see what they say.
Hey Buckley, this sounds like a great read. Are either of these books the one you are referring to?
http://www.amazon.com/Wounded-Heale...bs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1198910891&sr=8-2
http://www.amazon.com/Wounded-Heale...=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1198910891&sr=8-4
sorry for being rather technically challenged here, but let me know if you can view the pic. If not, PM me and I'll send it by email. Or maybe somebody can let me in on the secret on how to paste pics here. *shame*
The state I really wanted a prematch in (but they showed me no luvin'), asked only if I had been treated or diagnosed with pedophilia, voyeurism or necrophilia.
Guess they were only worried about the real sickos, eh?!
But the good news is... beastiality is still okay. Honey... can I buy a lama?
I have no idea how to post the pic I took in the right way (and I know the above doesn't work---sorry! I tried).
I've got few javalinas and coyotes running around the yard you can have for free!
Hi there. I hate to resurrect an ancient thread (and don't know if it's uncouth to do so, so apologies in advance), but I have a question pertaining to this and I have looked far and wide for an answer online and can't find one.
Is anyone familiar with a doctor who has dissociative identity disorder (DID)? I have a student who suffers from it and while med school is still a long ways off (at least six years), it would be best if we could figure out how this would be manageable because her greatest desire is to become a doctor.
She is bright and academically functional, but sometimes the DID kicks in and there are memory gaps here and there, especially in social situations. What I worry most about is that it gets worse under stress and we all know how stressful med school is. She is very reluctant towards formal therapy at the moment, and I fear that her reluctance will be a hindrance towards recovery and later on her affliction will become a liability re: licensing/practicing.
Thanks for any help you can give. If I don't find any responses at all because I messed up/should've posted in a new thread, I'll do so because this is a very important issue with her and we need some insight/answers.
I'm pretty certain DID would be a deal breaker at both the med school and residency level. Not only does it sound unsafe as a pt care issue but HR would have to be idiots to approve hiring someone that by definition will lack accountability for their actions but may be able to mount a vigorous ADA case.
FlameCane can correct me if I'm wrong here, but it sounds like the student might not have a formal diagnosis, since she hasn't sought formal treatment and FlameCane said it could be DDNOS rather than DID (which is a super controversial diagnosis anyway). It sounds like the aspirations to medical school might be what is keeping her from getting help.
I would just second that she needs a good psychiatrist and a good therapist. Getting her to a state of wellness is the most important thing, while career aspirations are secondary. I would impress on her the importance of being well so that she is good at whatever she eventually ends up doing, rather than talking specifically about the feasibility of medical school. I don't think a distant history of depersonalization episodes would automatically keep her out of medical school. Kurt Vonnegut's son, Mark Vonnegut, suffered from a manic episode and was kept hospitalized for weeks in the 70s, and he still got into Harvard Medical school. I would only hope our views of mental illness are more enlightened now (though some might argue otherwise).
I think at this point my greatest fear is that she just won't disclose anything to anyone and end up in med school/hiding everything and then either getting through it with great difficulty suppressing everything (or taking it out on me, since I'll probably be there) .
But she just cannot bring herself to tell anyone at all besides me about what happened (that brought on the PTSD/dissociation) or how she truly feels.
At times I'm at a loss as to how to talk to her because the dissociation (and possible/probable borderline-- her mother is borderline, and she still lives with her mother) renders her ability to communicate even with me nearly impossible as it rapidly escalates to her yelling at me/out of control/anger (even though as her academic mentor I keep my cool); and then within minutes it descends to near-muteness and tears.
I suppose I came here for my own benefit as well, if only for some mental support, as dealing with complex PTSD & DID/DDNOS is a harrowing experience in any case.
Please look after yourself. Keep appropriate professional boundaries with this young woman, don't fall into the trap of thinking that you are the only person who can help her and that you have to solve all her problems, and please don't think that if she fails in life it is because you failed her. If there is any way in which you can appropriately bring in other professional support for this young woman, please do so.
You say that she is talented in music and fine arts. These are traditionally areas which are more forgiving of different behaviours and less linear career paths, so might suit this young woman better than medicine. Also, many physicians enter the profession after gaining other work/life experience, rather than following the high school/undergrad/medical college/doctor at 26 route. It might be advantageous for this young woman to be one of those people who takes her time and gains a more rounded experience of life before putting herself onto the tramlines of a medical education.
Having been very close to her and knowing all of this--I broke off contact with her a little while ago.
Well, if her being able to manipulate others like she did to me (that's the sociopathy part) is any indication, she's flying under the radar pretty well since she's been able to get herself into a H.S. senior collegiate program. My biggest concern is for the people involved re: DID/practicing medicine.
I have extensive experience with DID patients. They normally don't fare well, but none of them were particularly 1) charismatic and 2) set on practising medicine.
So I'm confused here....
All that matters is what the plaintiff's lawyer digs up..I disagree.
Just because someone has sought appropriate psychiatric care doesn't make them "high risk"
The only thing the board questions separate is those who have sought appropriate care and those who haven't.
Those who haven't are allowed to continue practicing unstigmatized (who may actually represent a greater risk) and those who have are stigmatized.
That makes no sense whatsoever.
If diagnosed with depression by a physician - I would think that both legally and ethically one should mark yes. Obviously if never formally diagnosed or if one has never sought treatment - there's no way for the board to discover the "lie."
But I don't think boards should be asking about treatment for mental illness at all. I think they should just ask about whether an illness that IMPACTS ones ability to practice.
That way doctors can be free to seek the most competant care without being unfairly stigmatized or forced to reveal private details that have no impact on their ability to practice.
As I said one way to reduce stigma is to recognized that mental illnesses are very common. They should not be treated differently from physical ones form a medical board perspective. Significant physical illness can also clearly impair ones ability to practice. Boards should focus on impairment not the presence or absence of a diagnosis.
I always wondered, because I've been put in this position before. Are they're any pre-med or med students who have refused to seek treatment for mental illness for fear of being diagnosed, and further on not being accepted to med school or matched because of it?